Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Digital Audio

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Dec 10, 2012, 05:03 PM   #1
50548
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Currently in Switzerland
Is Amarra worth it with 44,100Hz sampled songs???

I am considering buying an Amarra HiFi license (the cheapest) to complement and enhance my iTunes library (most of encoded in Apple Lossless format) - having just used their trial version, I tend to hear the difference but am still not sure about the real benefits.

My question revolves around the fact that most if not all of my library is 44,100Hz sampled, therefore kind of defeating Amarra's purpose...or am I wrong?

Any expert advice is highly appreciated..!
50548 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 11, 2012, 03:02 PM   #2
bwhli
macrumors Demi-God
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Boston, MA
I don't think it's worth it. It won't necessarily sound better, maybe just different. You'd essentially be processing processed audio.
__________________
@bwhli
bwhli is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 11, 2012, 05:05 PM   #3
50548
Thread Starter
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Currently in Switzerland
Quote:
Originally Posted by bwhli View Post
I don't think it's worth it. It won't necessarily sound better, maybe just different. You'd essentially be processing processed audio.
So in which situations an app like Amarra would make sense? What about other alternatives?

By the way, is my Creative X-Fi USB interface already a DAC?
50548 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 11, 2012, 06:15 PM   #4
bwhli
macrumors Demi-God
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Boston, MA
Quote:
Originally Posted by BRLawyer View Post
So in which situations an app like Amarra would make sense? What about other alternatives?

By the way, is my Creative X-Fi USB interface already a DAC?
I think products like Amarra and SRS take advantage of the whole concept of "good sound quality". They don't make anything sound better (better is subjective). They just boost certain frequencies for a different perceived sound, and some people might find that better.

Yes, your USB interface is a DAC. If I were you, I'd save up and get this instead. The sound quality is REALLY good for the money.
__________________
@bwhli
bwhli is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 11, 2012, 06:32 PM   #5
50548
Thread Starter
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Currently in Switzerland
Quote:
Originally Posted by bwhli View Post
I think products like Amarra and SRS take advantage of the whole concept of "good sound quality". They don't make anything sound better (better is subjective). They just boost certain frequencies for a different perceived sound, and some people might find that better.

Yes, your USB interface is a DAC. If I were you, I'd save up and get this instead. The sound quality is REALLY good for the money.
Looks good, thanks...but which one should I get? The Icon 2 or the Icon HDP? I want to use my digital audio port on the iMac, by the way...
50548 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 11, 2012, 11:59 PM   #6
bwhli
macrumors Demi-God
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Boston, MA
Quote:
Originally Posted by BRLawyer View Post
Looks good, thanks...but which one should I get? The Icon 2 or the Icon HDP? I want to use my digital audio port on the iMac, by the way...
If you want to use digital out from your Mac, only the HDP supports S/PDIF. I've only had experience with u-DAC2. Since the HDP is a few hundred dollars more expensive, I expect it will perform even better than the u-DAC2.
__________________
@bwhli
bwhli is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 12, 2012, 12:20 AM   #7
Destroysall
macrumors 65816
 
Destroysall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: United States
Don't make the assumption that songs in 16-Bit/44.1kHz resolution (CD format) are not worth the investment in terms of quality playback. Not every form of music is available in high resolutions yet the audiophile world is still growing large. Perhaps 85% of my music library is in the standard "Red book" (CD format) resolution.

Amarra is considered among the best, if not the best, OS X players available. If you find the investment worth it, give it a go. Here's an article on OS X Audio Players:
http://www.headfonia.com/os-x-audio-...nd-bitperfect/

As far as DACs are concerned, I've owned both the both HDP and the u-DAC2 from NuForce, and personally I find the FiiO E10 much more appealing. It's been the most favorable DAC of the year for those on a tight budget. I use at current as I am aiming for a Schiit Audio Bifrost.

destroysall.
Destroysall is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Digital Audio

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GarageBand software vs sampled instruments inscrewtable Digital Audio 0 Dec 23, 2013 04:27 AM
How to make iTunes stop looking for songs on nas and locate songs on mac instead? Scorpia Mac Applications and Mac App Store 0 Sep 27, 2013 11:39 AM
How to put songs into itunes library without losing checked songs etc Scorpia Mac Applications and Mac App Store 0 Sep 27, 2013 09:31 AM
iTunes Match songs vs. downloaded songs zoezoezoe iCloud and Apple Services 1 Sep 21, 2013 01:48 PM
Itunes- copying songs and recognition of songs Kristina85 Mac Applications and Mac App Store 3 May 23, 2013 02:06 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:12 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC