Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > Mac mini

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 13, 2012, 10:41 AM   #26
johnmarshall4
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
I can confirm that the 2012 can also drive 2560x1440 through the HDMI. I had to use SwitchResX. The Pixel clock is still limited to 162Mhz. In SwitchResX I was able to drive my Dell U2711 at 40hz when I used CVT-RB as the custom settings method. 40hz isn't ideal of course but is plenty as I am using this as a secondary monitor, the primary is a 30". I have been able to drive the U2711 using HDMI or the HDMI to single link DVI dongle. For some reason the colors look washed out using the HDMI so I'm going to stick with DVI.
johnmarshall4 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2012, 04:09 AM   #27
playak
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnmarshall4 View Post
I can confirm that the 2012 can also drive 2560x1440 through the HDMI. I had to use SwitchResX. The Pixel clock is still limited to 162Mhz. In SwitchResX I was able to drive my Dell U2711 at 40hz when I used CVT-RB as the custom settings method. 40hz isn't ideal of course but is plenty as I am using this as a secondary monitor, the primary is a 30". I have been able to drive the U2711 using HDMI or the HDMI to single link DVI dongle. For some reason the colors look washed out using the HDMI so I'm going to stick with DVI.
I used the same settings as you to connect my 27" Eizo over HDMI. Works fine, but I'm wondering if there may be any side effects from using 40Hz. This is just the screen refresh rate, right? Shouldn't affect the color calibration etc?

thanks for any knowledge that someone here may be able to share.
playak is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2012, 04:27 PM   #28
nontroppo
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by terraphantm View Post
But what he's saying is that Apple seems to limit the VGA and HDMI outputs on these computers. Both should be capable of 2560 and beyond. And under Windows they are. So something about the OSX driver prevents it.
Your input to this thread has been excellent, thanks terraphantm!!!

Wonder if anyone has sent feedback to Apple about limiting the hardware through their software? As this doesn't affect their Thunderbolt display, I imagine if this is not deliberate on Apple's part, they don't have much incentive to fix it. If HDMI worked, I could use a £380 2560x1440 27" IPS Asus and still leave my TB port free without restricting me to pass-through only accessories...
nontroppo is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > Mac mini

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:35 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Privacy / DMCA contact / Affiliate and FTC Disclosure
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC