Please reread this thread. Did I make any reference to Cook's predecessor? You went on about what I forgot or never knew. Condescending, sarcastic. What do you get from that?
The thread is about the CFO selling shares as soon as he could. My investments are my own. Yours are to manage as you see fit. Why did you have a need to get on me?
Please read the thread again. If I made a reference to Cook's predecessor other than this post I would like you to call it to my attention.
Thanks you very much.
Okay, we'll close our eyes for a moment and try to imagine that Tim Cook did not have a predecessor. Sorry, it doesn't work for me. YMMV.
The point of discussing the person who preceded Cook is to make the point that Cook was the named and de facto CEO of Apple for several years before that other person died, and seems to have done so with some measure of success. Do you not agree? If not, why?
I also made the point that Oppenheimer's stock sale isn't a significant event, for stated reasons.
Did you respond to this point or any of the others in any way, shape or form? Did you tell us why Cook makes you "uncomfortable" or attempt to substantiate any other of your vague criticisms of his leadership or record? Ample opportunity provided.
I did not ask you about your investments. You volunteered that. I don't care about your investments. I didn't mention mine, either, as I assumed you would be equally disinterested in my investments.
I took the trouble to make a detailed point. When you bothered to respond at all, your response was vague and dismissive. This by my definition is condescending and sarcastic. But again, YMMV.