If you rip an image, you can always burn a copy of it.AND BluRay includes instantaneous replacement if I ever lose the original, right?
And what was the resale value of your digital library again?
If you rip an image, you can always burn a copy of it.AND BluRay includes instantaneous replacement if I ever lose the original, right?
Well all you need there is a £40 bluray player per TV, instead of a £99 Apple TV per TV.
I picked up a free HD TV show from iTunes during a Christmas giveaway event but it won't play on my iPod Classic (2008). Whereas all my films on physical media play on my 2006 PS3 .
And if you don't want to lose them you can always do a backup. DVDs are very simple and I think there's a convertor for blurays too. Just incase you want digital download levels of backup security.
you can buy a blu ray with a digital copy and redeem it in itunes
otherwise DVD's from 15 years ago play in all blu ray players. and they will play in the upcoming 4K players as well. that's decades of compatibility right there
who knows what is going to happen with digital copies in 20 years? itunes is a growing business and in these cases its always customer oriented. once revenue/profits stop growing every company starts finding ways to charge customers more money
What's the legality of pirating content again?If you rip an image, you can always burn a copy of it.
And what was the resale value of your digital library again?
What's the legality of pirating content again?
That's not pirating. Unless he sells his original copies while still using his backed up copy..
Image
I'm no expert, and I'm not saying your wrong either, but a few keywords do stand out:
"The unauthorized reproduction or...." and "infringement without monetary gain"
Perhaps someone more knowledgeable on the issue can chime in.
Image
I'm no expert, and I'm not saying your wrong either, but a few keywords do stand out:
"The unauthorized reproduction or...." and "infringement without monetary gain"
Perhaps someone more knowledgeable on the issue can chime in.
I too got all excited on the $9.99 offer, just to be let down when it errored and modified to $59.99.
Regarding buying movies, I think the store would be very wise to allow a rented movie to be converted to a purchase within the 24 hour time period of its rental. I rented Oblivion last weekend and really liked it; I could see myself watching it again and would have gladly converted that $5 rental into a $15 purchase. But since it would have cost me the $15 ON TOP of the rental, I decided that for $20 I'd just order the blu-ray on Amazon and rip it to add to my digital collection. For the same amount I get the physical disc and offline viewing options. I'm sure Apple is doing just fine on movie rentals and purchases, but it does seem like they could really boost their revenue (and their influence) by exploring this "convert your choice" option.
Digital movies should NEVER be more than physical copies. Ever. $10-$15 is, IMO, a reasonable price for a digital movie purchase, and the sweet spot where I can justify an impulse buy. Anything more and I have to think too hard about it, which means I either don't buy, or I buy the physical copy. (Even then, I won't pay more than $20 for a BR.)
I'm curious, when you buy one of these "bundles" from iTunes, do the movies show up independently in your library, or do they appear as one movie that you click on to open and show the individual films - like TV series do with individual episodes now? In other words, if I were to buy the Harry Potter bundle, would the image in my library be the cover for the bundle or would all eight individual movies be there?
Clearly the $9.99 price was an error.
The thing is, it is legal to back up your own collection and as long as you can prove ownership of the original disc. I do this and am fine with it and still have all of my DVDs in a giant case.
The reproduction for personal use as a backup does not constitute infringement since that portion of the statement applies when copies of movies are made and given to others without monetary gain.
One thing should be obvious to the studios from this. If you sale your wares at a reasonable price people will beat down your doors to buy. As a side benefit most likely piracy would decrease as well.
I just got off of a chat with apple support, and this may have already been brought up, but the studios set the price for the movies. I've been trying to buy the Harry Potter collection for $10, and it has been flipping to $60. And I guess this isn't really an apple or itunes issue.
I've never understood this argument. If the studios set the price for Apple (poor, helpless, Apple, only the most valuable company on the planet by market cap), how come they don't set the price for Amazon, where it's usually cheaper to buy an actual Blu-Ray? Personally I've always thought this was just Apple's way of ensuring they get their healthy 40% cut.
Somehow I think that if there was some competition for buying movies to download that Apple would suddenly and magically find they could drop their prices.