Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Photography

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jun 13, 2013, 02:03 PM   #1
MarcMG
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Aperture Migration

My use of Aperture has grown organically and I now find myself in a bit of a pickle. I started using Aperture on my iMac desktop, where I now have a 100GB library on the internal hard drive. I then purchased a MacBook Pro and installed Aperture there. I have a separate library of about 300GB there.

It is silly to have separate Aperture libraries. I believe that I have the means to merge these libraries: http://support.apple.com/kb/VI159 However, this does not solve all of my problems.

Neither my MacBook nor my MBP possesses enough head room to contain the merged library. Okay, I've got plenty of external harddrives that can serve that purpose. Is the following procedure correct, assuming I wish to consolidate the libraries on a hard drive near my desk top?
  1. Connect hard drive with sufficient space to iMac.
  2. Relocate iMac's Aperture Library to hard drive.
  3. With MBP on the network, merge its library into the "master" library on the hard drive.
If I understand this correctly, the Aperture library on my MBP will be emptied into the master library (or could thereafter be deleted). I could move projects back to the MBP if I needed to carry them with me.

What leaves me a bit confused is that the Apple documentation suggests that only masters are merged. What about versions as well? I wouldn't want to lose all of the changes I made to the masters.

Once I clean up the MPB internal storage to below 256 GB, then I can consider getting one of the newfangled rMBP with 256 GB flash. Perhaps all of this isn't as complicated as it seems, but I've not been down this road and there's much at risk with all of my images.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Marc
MarcMG is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 13, 2013, 05:16 PM   #2
ChrisA
macrumors G4
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redondo Beach, California
You gave the right idea. It will work.

In perture a project is a self contained object that has all the images and the edits and meta data. If the same image is now in two projects on two computers, then after to move them you will have two images in two projects on one computer.
ChrisA is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 14, 2013, 06:23 AM   #3
MCAsan
macrumors 68020
 
MCAsan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Atlanta
We went maxed out rMBP so we have plenty of SSD space in the field to collect photos on 2 week trips. When back home the photos are culled/editted and moved to external RAID 1 storage.

Fpr us 256 SSD would leave little room after OS, apps and email. Suggest you get 512 or 768.

The 2,7/16/768 rMBP is $2700 at MacMall and is $1000 less that when it launched a year ago.

http://appleinsider.com/mac_price_guide/#
__________________
Retina MBP 11,3 2.6GHz | 16GB | 1TB
Thunderbolt Display
iPhone 5s | Silver | 64GB | AT&T
iPad Air | Silver | 128GB | WiFi only
MCAsan is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 14, 2013, 03:20 PM   #4
Woodenboat
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: North Carolina
Editing is the key to your future happiness.

I recommend that you delete 50% of your photos. I am confident that a 300 gigabyte library is riddled with duplicates, redundant and reject photos.
Everything on your computer, hardrive and Aperture get easier if you keep only your best and most sentimental photos.
Its hard work but worth it.
Woodenboat is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 14, 2013, 07:14 PM   #5
ChrisA
macrumors G4
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redondo Beach, California
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodenboat View Post
I recommend that you delete 50% of your photos. I am confident that a 300 gigabyte library is riddled with duplicates, redundant and reject photos.
Everything on your computer, hardrive and Aperture get easier if you keep only your best and most sentimental photos.
Its hard work but worth it.
You are right. Culling will improve the average quality of the library. It is easy to look at 8 images and find the worst two and trash those. Do this periodically.
ChrisA is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Photography

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Aperture: Phil Shiller leaks Aperture 4 on stage! ipedro Digital Photography 41 Jul 23, 2014 02:41 PM
Aperture Migration Import woes a4est42 Digital Photography 2 Feb 22, 2014 05:05 PM
Downgrade Aperture 3 Library to work with Aperture 2.0? macnerd93 PowerPC Macs 2 Feb 4, 2013 02:44 PM
Aperture library to iPhoto, No longer own Aperture. utahusker Mac Applications and Mac App Store 2 Oct 2, 2012 06:22 PM
Aperture 3 > Lightroom 4 Migration File Format? Mac In School Digital Photography 7 Jun 18, 2012 07:22 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC