|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#176 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#177 | |
|
Quote:
If you steal my phone, then I just go to Apple's website and unregister the device using my old password and either another registered device (another phone, iPad or Mac) or my super secret password. |
||
|
|
2
|
|
|
#178 |
|
How do you change to the two-step system? And does it work for Macs or just iOS devices?
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#179 |
|
There would be no issue if you could just remove your damn credit card but Apple does not allow that.
![]() It's a website where they let you create accounts with fake data and corporations are willing to throw money and free products at you just for sharing their ads with other fakes.
__________________
Free Palestine | Fight against the occupiers of Palestine Last edited by emulator; Mar 24, 2013 at 10:13 AM. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#180 | |
|
Quote:
Umm, you might be surprised. I've looked at a bunch of my friends' Gmail accounts and found similar issues. Try this little experiment (assuming you're not already using two-factor): Log into Gmail, then scroll to the bottom of the page. On the lower-right, where it says last account activity, click the details button. Look long and hard at the places from where your account has been accessed. I can guarantee that almost anyone using Gmail without two factor authentication will likely be signing up after looking at that.
__________________
Desktop, Desktop, Laptop, Phone, Tablet |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#181 | |
|
Quote:
I'm also pretty diligent about logging out all sessions except the one I'm using. That feature though isn't the end-all/be-all. I have found that it can give me wonky info based on if I'm logging in via cell vs ATT hotspot vs work vs home, etc. My work has a few IP addresses and also depends on if I'm going through vpn or not. But as a practice - it's good that Google can show you what sessions are active. I'm not sure yahoo or other mail services have that |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#182 |
|
Everyone knew these things would happen one day. Apple is pretty unprepared for the increasing security threats to their systems. They rode the "obscurity" protection too long and didn't do enough to prepare for what everyone else saw coming as Apple got popular. Expect more like this.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#183 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Desktop, Desktop, Laptop, Phone, Tablet |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#184 | |||
|
Quote:
How does anybody know your password? How do they get into your account without knowing it? ---------- Quote:
---------- Quote:
2. Don't use a service like Google for anything that is sensitive. if you want to trade secrets via email, use a real email program with POP3 access. If all your mail (or anything else) is sitting on some third party server, it is not secure. "The Cloud' is NOT secure or private. Keep your stuff locally. |
||||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#185 | |
|
Ugh.
Lets see, lets use a user ID we freely give out to friends and all manner of online websites. It's probably on our business cards. Next will authenticate with data that is available through public records for all citizens. Bravo. ![]() ---------- Quote:
We should have seen a HUGE increase in the amount of Mac malware due to the growth and acceptance of OSX but we are not seeing that. They did prepare, they built the OS with security in mind. That is why we haven't seen the amount of malware and viruses that you see in the Windows world. Most of what you see right now is malware that is installed by users by clicking OK to install requests. It's not easy to secure a system against user installed apps.
__________________
That's "Geniuses," not Genii, genius. To err, is PC. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#186 | |
|
Quote:
Even locally held is not secure or private as there is a risk of intercept during sending and/or receiving.
__________________
rMBP Mid '12 2.6 GHz, 8GB, 512GB, OSX 10.8.3; iPhone 4 S 16GB 27" iMac Late '09 C2D 3.06 GHz, 4GB, 1TB, OSX 10.8.3 MacBook Early '09 2.0 GHz, 2GB, 250GB, OSX 10.8.3 |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#187 | |
|
Quote:
I was talking about stuff like personal details of your life. Low level secrets. For real secrets, you use asymmetrical encryption, with a public and private key. Sending a key to your recipient, as you suggest, is inherently unsafe, and if you can do it with reliable security, you may as well just transmit the original message that way. Google public key cryptography for more info. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#188 | |
|
Quote:
Second, POP email is just as insecure as IMAP. The mails still go through carrier's servers. And in many cases downloaded POP mails stays on servers even after being downloaded to the local machine. I'm glad your gmail account hasn't been hacked. Yet. But anyone using the internet at all who is serious about protecting their data in this day and age needs to be taking advantage of two-factor authentication whenever possible. As far as "trading secrets" is concerned, almost every email I send or receive has the potential of "trading secrets." I don't want my personal conversations in anyone else's hands, and I definitely don't want communications between my financial institutions and myself to be viewed by anyone else, no matter how innocuous those communications may seem. Also keep in mind that someone doesn't have to be looking for you specifically to find you. Your name, email address or other personal information could be in the records of another entity that could have been hacked. Also, while on my soapbox I will make this recommendation to anyone who has a strong internet presence, and takes their security and privacy seriously. Purchase a good identity theft monitoring package. I personally use a package from one of the three big credit reporting agencies, and it only costs me $18 a month. Comes with unlimited credit reports from all three bureaus, and a credit score check whenever I want. Also notifies me of any activity on my files, and is completely customizable. $18 a month is a bargain for that peace of mind.
__________________
Desktop, Desktop, Laptop, Phone, Tablet |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#189 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#190 |
|
I've thought about it, and I concede that you and the other poster (who said largely the same things) are each correct.
I think I was talking more about my discomfort with leaving sensitive email on Google's servers than I was thinking about the inherent insecurity of POP email. Yes - POP is equally insecure. But at least they're not authorized to scan it for keywords, unlike Gmail, where your correspondence generates directed advertising. Gmail kind of horrifies me. So what do you do to keep your email confidential? Do you use Tor for browsing? |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#191 | |
|
Quote:
They most surely rode the "obscurity protection" wave. Just look at the "I'm a Mac vs PC" commercials. And they're still obscure when it comes to computers which explains why there still isn't much malware out there on Macs. |
||
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:44 PM.














Linear Mode
