Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > Mac mini

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Dec 21, 2012, 09:13 AM   #1
gdourado
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
DIY Fusion drive: Performance difference between 7200 and 5400 rpm?

Hello,

Like the topic says, if I put a 128gb or 256gb SSD as a second drive in a 2012 i7 mini with the standard 1tb 5400 rpm drive, will performance be noticiable different if I replace the standard 1tb drive with let's say a western digital black 750gb 7200 rpm hdd?

Basically, is a DIY fusion with SSD and 7200 rpm drive faster than a DIY fusion with SSD and 5400 rpm hdd?

Cheers!
gdourado is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2012, 09:30 AM   #2
philipma1957
macrumors 603
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
good question I do not think anyone has tested it out yet. I have played around with apples fusion it is really fast.


if I was to diy one I would go for the biggest ssd (at least a 256gb) and use apples 1tb . but that is just me.


my thinking is as the fusion drive fills it will get slower since more is on the hdd . so a bigger ssd and a bigger hdd may work faster with the most info.

256gb ssd plus 1tb hdd filled with 628gb vs

256gb ssd plus 750gb hdd filled with 628gb

the first is 50% the second is 62.4 %



the fusion program will make decisions where to put info/programs based on ?

one of the ? has to be disk size vs disk space occupied .

so my guess is the bigger the better.
philipma1957 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2012, 09:51 AM   #3
KrisLord
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northumberland, UK
Whilst size of drives would be relevant, I don't see the speed of the slower drive being too important. Writes hit the SSD first and only when idle does it shuffle data to the mechanical drive. So there is no urgency on this part of the process.
KrisLord is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2012, 10:05 AM   #4
philipma1957
macrumors 603
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by KrisLord View Post
Whilst size of drives would be relevant, I don't see the speed of the slower drive being too important. Writes hit the SSD first and only when idle does it shuffle data to the mechanical drive. So there is no urgency on this part of the process.
thats is my thinking..


When I get the time.. I will do some testing with 800gb on an apple fusion of 128gb ssd + 1tb hdd.

my priority is low for this as I have the promise pegasus r6 and a few lacie lbds all thunderbolt. this kind of makes fusion worthless to me. although for the right user it does seem nice.
philipma1957 is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > Mac mini

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:09 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC