Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > iMac

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Feb 10, 2013, 02:14 PM   #1
cap2013
Guest
 
Cool iMac Core i7 or Core i5 for Gamers?

Which CPU do you suggest to buy, if you want to use the iMac as a Game machine as well ?

Core I7 or Core I5 for the new iMAc ?

Of course the necessary upgrade is the GeForce 680 MX - but interesting question is the CPU.

Is the Core I7 with Hyperthreading worth the upgrade for Gamers ?
  0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2013, 03:34 PM   #2
MacAlien
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Not really as I'm *almost* positive no game on the market has or would use more than the i5.
__________________
---
Old: 21" 2.4 Intel Core 2 Duo, 3GB RAM, ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro 256 MB, 275GB HD.
Current: 27" 3.2 i5, 32GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX 2GB GDDR5, 1TB HD.
MacAlien is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2013, 03:35 PM   #3
Mac32
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
At present the difference is not noticable. I do see some dx11 demos now where hyperthreading with quad cores makes a bigger difference (unigine), but by the time quad core-hyperthreading *might* make a noticable difference in games, 680MX will most likely struggle anyway. If you look at i3 CPUs (dual core), hyperthreading makes a big difference.
I got the i7, mostly because I ordered the SSD option, and the machine was already very expensive. The i7 is definately not necessary for gaming.
There's a new Playstation (and Xbox?) on the horizon btw, and they could promt more use of hyperthreading. But at present 4 cores (i5) is plenty for the most demanding games out there.
Mac32 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2013, 03:52 PM   #4
cap2013
Guest
 
So the i7 is only recommandable for faster Video transcoding; right ?

E.g. Handbrake or EyeTV...
  0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2013, 04:36 PM   #5
azure247
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
CPU's are never fully utilized in games. GPU is 100% utilized. It makes no sense to get an i7 unless u enjoy wasting extra dollars. All u need is the 680MX.
azure247 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2013, 04:49 PM   #6
jmpage2
macrumors 68030
 
jmpage2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by cap2013 View Post
So the i7 is only recommandable for faster Video transcoding; right ?

E.g. Handbrake or EyeTV...
Well, there are quite a few apps where the hyperthreading comes into play, but in many cases the difference is not as pronounced as it is in things like video encoding.

The i7 is a little more "future proof" so, as time goes on and hyperthreading works its way into more and more apps (and games) then you might get a little more longevity from the i7 vs the i5.

For the software out there right now, if gaming is your priority it is very hard to recommend the i7 over the i5.
jmpage2 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2013, 07:30 PM   #7
iSayuSay
macrumors 68030
 
iSayuSay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
i7 option on iMac is a silly way to spend $200 if you're looking it as a gaming machine.

Yet again, 680MX is not that great for the money you're gonna spend for an iMac.
Yep, same old story, custom build gaming box gets you more for the same $$. You don't need to get a high end 27" model to build a machine with desktop GTX 680 or even 690
iSayuSay is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2013, 10:22 PM   #8
azure247
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Yeah, macs are only great for basic gaming, nothing graphics intensive and its really a waste of money to get a high-end to only perform okay compared to a PC.

Imo, get a PC for hardcore gaming. I dont play MMORPGs anymore which demands high specs to perform and look beautiful so an imac is great for me. I like the space it saves and the screen is a beaut.
azure247 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 11, 2013, 10:22 PM   #9
jmpage2
macrumors 68030
 
jmpage2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by iSayuSay View Post
i7 option on iMac is a silly way to spend $200 if you're looking it as a gaming machine.

Yet again, 680MX is not that great for the money you're gonna spend for an iMac.
Yep, same old story, custom build gaming box gets you more for the same $$. You don't need to get a high end 27" model to build a machine with desktop GTX 680 or even 690
Well the desktop 680 is about $450 and only 35% faster than the 680MX. The MX is a helluva card in the iMac for a measly $200.
jmpage2 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 11, 2013, 10:30 PM   #10
Aluminum213
macrumors 65816
 
Aluminum213's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Don't buy a mac for gaming, not only do a small fraction of games even come out for it, the ones that do run worse on Mac. I have a fully speced out late 2012 iMac, but that's just for audio/video editing


my gaming is done on PS3/360/WiiU, and PS4 later this year
__________________
2012 iMac 27" | i7 | 3.4Ghz | Fusion | 32GB RAM | 680MX
iPhone 5 | Black | 32GB
TV (3rd Gen)
Aluminum213 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 11, 2013, 11:56 PM   #11
iSayuSay
macrumors 68030
 
iSayuSay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmpage2 View Post
Well the desktop 680 is about $450 and only 35% faster than the 680MX. The MX is a helluva card in the iMac for a measly $200.
680MX chip alone does not cost $200. I don't know how you pull the number but I assume you might talked about $150 extra for GPU option?

Bear in mind that it's an upgrade cost from the base 675MX, not for the chip itself. You still paid $2000 for the stock machine and another $150 to have the 680MX.

While $450 gets you a full retail desktop GTX 680, right from nothing. Not a fair comparison, I might say.
iSayuSay is offline   1 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > iMac

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Real world difference between dual-core 13" rMBP and my quad-core iMac PatriotInvasion MacBook Pro 8 Apr 1, 2013 02:00 PM
Mid 2007 iMac CPU upgrade: Core 2 Duo to Core 2 Extreme or Core 2 Quad Hexley iMac 2 Dec 9, 2012 09:56 AM
Refurbished iMac 27-inch 3.4GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i7 carl0sian Buying Tips and Advice 18 Nov 4, 2012 07:17 PM
Upgrade Late 2006 17in iMac core 2 duo 2.0 to core 2 quad q6600? drjaymez iMac 6 Oct 21, 2012 05:42 PM
Performance difference between Dual core i7 in 2012 MBP 13 v/s Quad Core 2011 iMac i5 mjoshi123 MacBook Pro 3 Sep 14, 2012 02:11 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC