|
|
#1 |
|
More powerful iPad 2 or iPad mini?
Are they basically the same specs with a different screen? What are their exact differences?
Also, are there any apps that will not run on a 2? I know there are quite a few that you need at least a 2 (no 1st gen), but are there any that you need at least a 3 for?
__________________
iPhone 4s
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 |
|
They are the same processor-wise.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#3 |
|
iPad mini has:
- updated/faster lightning connector - much better front and rear cameras - SIRI - longer battery life - screen has higher ppi (but same resolution) - stereo speakers - A5 chip is thinner for more efficiency - updated design and much lighter - faster updated WiFi - runs every app in app store - $70 less expensive (about 20% less) Last edited by flavr; Feb 8, 2013 at 11:02 PM. |
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
#4 |
|
I think the iPad mini is one of the best Apple products over the past 10 years. Superb size and weight. When the retina display comes, it could very well be the greatest selling tablet of all time.
I got the LTE 32 gig and think it's incredible. Having a wifi only iPad meant i never took it anywhere. It was too big and drained my phones battery when tethered. Plus, LTE is awesome. Just need a really good stylus as Evernote and penultimate are exactly what this device is for. (that and the kindle app). I had been concerned about the resolution of the mini but find reading really not that difficult at all on it. When you increase the font size a bit, there are no issues with it. Get one.
__________________
Canon 5D MK III, Canon 7d, Canon 70-200L f2.8 IS MKII, Canon TC X2 MKIII, Canon 24-105L f4, Tokina 11-16 f2.8, Canon 50 f1.8, Canon 430EX II http://www.flickr.com/photos/picsbykev/ |
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#5 |
|
You say this as if it's inherently a positive. It has a higher PPI because it has a smaller screen. Text is no sharper than on the ipad 2 because the rendering algorithims are essentially the same. Some would rather more physical real estate over an increased PPI @ the same number of effective pixels.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Quote:
do you own an iPad mini? |
||
|
|
2
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Quote:
OP, neither is more powerful than the other. The benefits of the mini have been explained well here, but in terms of power they're identical. My advice: unless screen size is important to you (remember that the actual resolution, the number of pixels, is no different), get the mini. It has plenty of benefits over the iPad 2 that aren't related to power.
__________________
13" 2009 MBP, 2.26 GHz C2D, 8 GB RAM, 320 GB HDD; 2.2 GHz C2D MB, 6 GB RAM, 160 GB HDD; 32 GB iPod Touch 3G -FWIW, my handle is iThink_ergo_iMac. There seems to be some confusion on this issue.- |
||
|
|
3
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Quote:
Anyway, thanks for the input everyone.
__________________
iPhone 4s
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
2
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
No.
Quote:
Graphics and UI elements yes. Text no. Because 1) PPI has increased but resolution remains the same. 2) The smaller screen means that the normal viewing distance has changed 3) Same OS with the same rendering engine (the only way to make it sharper ath the same resolution would be to render fonts larger, which would allow more anti-aliasing). When you combine all 3 of these it negates any benefit to text from a higher PPI. This is probably the 100th I've explained this on this forum, yet the same misinformed crap is stated here as facts. I don't think I'm going to bother anymore. There will always be a certian % of people on any forum that spread misinformation and are not willing to be corrected no matter what. Last edited by syd430; Feb 9, 2013 at 02:34 AM. |
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Yeah I see what he's saying. Looking at my ipad 1 and mini, text looks basically the same. Everything's just smaller.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#13 |
|
The screen is a lot nicer. Despite being the same resolution, the smaller size makes it difficult to notice its not retina. Also they removed a layer from the glass, so it looks more lifelike. My partner upgraded from the iPad 1 and can't get over how much better the screen is. I have an iPad 3 and I can tell the difference, but it's not much.
__________________
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#14 | |||
|
If the UI elements get sharper because of the increased PPI, then so does the text.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Amusingly, only half my post was about text sharpness, yet you said almost every sentence was objectively incorrect. Do you also disagree with my statements about the mini being better in a lot of ways to the iPad 2 that aren't related to power?
__________________
13" 2009 MBP, 2.26 GHz C2D, 8 GB RAM, 320 GB HDD; 2.2 GHz C2D MB, 6 GB RAM, 160 GB HDD; 32 GB iPod Touch 3G -FWIW, my handle is iThink_ergo_iMac. There seems to be some confusion on this issue.- |
||||
|
|
2
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Quote:
Lightning connector is nothing more than a buzz word, it runs NO FASTER than the original 30 pin adapter. Not sure about the speakers and you're right about the cameras. That being said, both the iPad 2 and iPad Mini are just as "powerful" as one another because they are running the same chip. However, the iPad Mini is a better deal because of the updated cameras and price. Really surprised that the iPad 2 is even for sale anymore, seems kind of silly. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#16 |
|
I completely agree with you! And for me (and many other who writes a lot) it seems that the soon to come Logitech Ultrathin BT Keyboard for the iPad Mini will be a kind of crown on this great Apple product, and IMO contribute to make it the greatest selling tablet of all time, and also the most practical and portable useful one! I can't wait for that keyboard - that will, for me, make the completion of a perfect combo! And, of course: I really hope that we don't have to wait too long for the retina display, and I further must stress that such a display (with all that it needs of resources), must NOT change the iPad Mini footprint or weight.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#17 | ||
|
Quote:
Ignore the a5 reference tho. If you brought new today from apple the a5 chips would be identical. It was the original iPad 2 that had the older a5 chip ---------- Quote:
|
|||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#18 |
|
This is kind of true. The devices that use Lightning do sync faster than their 30-pin brethren, but that's quite possibly due to the fact that those devices are faster themselves. Also, from what I understand, Lightning has the ability to sync at USB 3 speeds, but Apple hasn't unlocked that aspect. I don't really have good sources for that, though, it's just what I've heard.
__________________
13" 2009 MBP, 2.26 GHz C2D, 8 GB RAM, 320 GB HDD; 2.2 GHz C2D MB, 6 GB RAM, 160 GB HDD; 32 GB iPod Touch 3G -FWIW, my handle is iThink_ergo_iMac. There seems to be some confusion on this issue.- |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#19 |
|
|
1
|
|
|
#20 |
|
What a factual argument! I'm willing to be convinced, but my understanding of how screens work and my own experience with the mini show me that the text is sharper on the mini. If you can illustrate reasons to me beyond "the rendering algorithm is the same", I might be convinced.
__________________
13" 2009 MBP, 2.26 GHz C2D, 8 GB RAM, 320 GB HDD; 2.2 GHz C2D MB, 6 GB RAM, 160 GB HDD; 32 GB iPod Touch 3G -FWIW, my handle is iThink_ergo_iMac. There seems to be some confusion on this issue.- |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#22 |
|
About iPad mini text.
Most people increase font size in iPad mini, to match the "real world" size of text on an iPad. When the text size is matched, iPad mini's sharpness increase is noticeable, tho less text is displayed. So yeah, iPad vs iPad mini size-matched text sharpness is better on the mini, if hold at the same viewing distance.
__________________
MacBook Pro 13" 2.3Ghz, 8GB RAM ; 16GB iPhone 5 ; 32GB iPad mini
|
|
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:55 PM.




iPhone 4s 


Linear Mode
