|
|
#1 |
|
Math Halp!
So, after being out of traditional classroom math for over two years now, I'm starting to struggle with basic word problems. I'm taking an online practice exam for my upcoming math class, and I cannot figure out the answer to this question.
"A rectangular box with volume 360 cubic feet is built with a square base and top. The cost is $1.50 per square foot for the top and the bottom and $2.00 per square foot for the sides. Let x represent the length of a side of the base. Express the cost the box as a function of x." Thanks for any help...
__________________
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 |
|
(1.5x^2)(2y)=360 is a good start for you.
__________________
After the Army: no one can stay forever |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#3 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#4 |
|
In situations like this drawing a picture might help.
You know that you've got the top and bottom of your box and these are squares of area x times x or x^2. They in total have area 2x^2 and so the cost of the top and bottom is that times $1.5 I.e. 1.5(2x^2) or 3x^2 The sides are each of area x times the vertical, which I'll call y, and there are four of them, 4(xy), cost 2 a sq ft so 8xy. The total cost is $360 which = 3x^2 + 8xy At this point I'm puzzled as this differs from what was suggested first above... Still, I've shown my working so am confident(!) I suspect r.j.s. was thinking about volumes in a muddled sort of way? |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#5 |
|
O RLY?
![]() HINT: the volume of the box is a function of x and y which allows you to express y as a function of x. Stick that back in the formula for the cost of the box. EDIT: HINT 2: It helps to also write the units down. This way you don't try to equate $ and cubic feet. B
__________________
MBA (13" 1.7 GHz 128GB), UMBP (15" SD 2.8 GHz), UMB (13" 2.4 GHz), iMac (17" Yonah), 32GB iPad 3 WiFi+LTE, 64 GB iPad WiFi, 32 GB iPhone 5, Airport Extreme |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#6 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Quote:
I shouldn't do maths on morphine.
__________________
After the Army: no one can stay forever |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Quote:
Anyway, it is actually possible now with balamw's insight. The formula I derived above is for cost, but we need to get rid of y. As the formula for the volume of the box which we know(!) is x.x.y then x^2y = 360 Rearranging we get a formula for y which we can substitute back in. Last edited by leighonigar; Dec 11, 2012 at 07:17 PM. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#9 |
|
I have 'people' for that type of thing.
__________________
Never argue with idiots.
They'll drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#10 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#11 |
|
ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS draw a picture. Start there, then brute logic your way through it.
|
|
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30 AM.










Linear Mode
