Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Aug 14, 2010, 02:52 AM   #51
ThisIsNotMe
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
VirnetX has a market cap of ~250 million.

Seems like Apple could take care of this very easily.
ThisIsNotMe is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 14, 2010, 04:10 AM   #52
Master Chief
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulpinemac View Post
Unlike the Patent Trolls, Apple at least tries to do something with the ideas they patent. The Trolls simply sit on them until somebody else builds it, then either demands licensing or sues for cash.
Anyone is free to fight the system, but it is usually wasted time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LagunaSol View Post
True. I don't recall Apple ever suing anyone for a patent they owned but didn't have implemented in an existing product on the market.
So why is that? Is that because the patents are not great ideas after all, or that most companies actually check the patent database before stepping in? Unlike Apple who, sitting on a large sum of money, usually takes the lets-wait-and-see approach; had to cough up late license fees, time after time already. Some people just don't like the Apple way of handling things.
Master Chief is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 14, 2010, 02:07 PM   #53
ranReloaded
macrumors 6502a
 
ranReloaded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Tokyo
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmatthewware View Post
Patent reform?

I get it when Nokia sues Apple, or visa versa. Those are active companies actively producing things. I hate it when patent holding companies sue people. So, you patent something, have no intention of doing anything with it, then wait for someone not only to use it, but make money on it. Then you sue. You don't sue when it first happens, you wait until the pot is sweet enough. These people are vultures in the worst way, and it shouldn't be allowed to go on like this.
+1
ranReloaded is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2012, 11:08 PM   #54
FakeWozniak
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Holy Hell

$360+ Million for VPN...

They're going to whack Cisco, Apple, Avaya, then move on to anyone else. This troll has teeth :-(

http://9to5mac.com/2012/11/06/apple-...-court-ruling/
FakeWozniak is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apple Hit With $625 Million Judgment in Patent Suit Over Cover Flow, Spotlight, Time Machine MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 348 Dec 8, 2010 05:42 AM
Apple 'Lawyering Up' as Patent Suits Grow MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 78 Dec 3, 2010 10:19 AM
Adobe Has 'Moved On' in Dispute With Apple Over Flash on iOS Devices MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 326 Oct 2, 2010 11:22 AM
Apple Facing New Patent Lawsuit Over iPhone MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 121 May 11, 2010 01:56 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:45 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC