Cruel is in the eye of the beholder.
Frankly, she got off easy. They should have put her at a school cross walk for a week and taken her license. Driving is a privilege and not a right, abuse it and lose it.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
After Driving on sidewalk to Avoid School Bus, Woman must wear "Idiot" sign
- Thread starter bradl
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Cruel is in the eye of the beholder.
Frankly, she got off easy. They should have put her at a school cross walk for a week and taken her license. Driving is a privilege and not a right, abuse it and lose it.
No, actually. In this context 'cruel' is in the eye of the US Supreme Court Justices. I wonder how they will rule on this when one of these gung-ho locally elected judges finally has their vengeful sentence appealed up to the Supreme Court.
I don't argue that she should have been punished, and punished severely. My quibble is with the sign.
Personally, I would have sent her back to traffic school. More time needed than standing on the corner. Might actually do some good.
Um, no...
You find the punishment 'cruel' so it is cruel in your eye. The court decided this was a justifiable sentence in this particular case, they said nothing about it being 'cruel'.
I don't find it cruel, but think these kinds of punishments could be more effect than only a fine.
You are right - it is my opinion. I must have been a bit confused because a moment ago this discussion was in fact talking about the US 8th amendment, which is ultimately interpreted by the Supreme Court.
But, if we are going to ignore the 8th amendment, then yes...it is only my opinion. It is also my opinion that someone should appeal one of these sentences up to the Supreme Court as soon as possible. In the mean time, I will rest assured that while the US is still basing it's system of justice on a precept that dates back to the middle ages, I live in a country that has moved on. Along with the rest of the industrialized world. Ridiculing people didn't work 500 years ago, and it doesn't work now.
I can't for the life of me figure out why you are taking this "punishment" as too extreme.
The worst that can happen is that she might get a paper cut from the sign, or a cold from standing outside.
Hell, she had everything on but a full burka anyway.
I can't for the life of me figure out why you are taking this "punishment" as too extreme.
The worst that can happen is that she might get a paper cut from the sign, or a cold from standing outside.
Hell, she had everything on but a full burka anyway.
It's the principle. The State (as in the Government, not Ohio specifically) is not supposed to use the justice system for vengence, or for our entertainment, or to make us feel better. This isn't justice, it's ridicule. What's next, putting people on a horse backwards with a sign? I suppose so - since that was also popular 500 years ago in the dark ages.
Idiocy at it's finest, glad she was finally stopped
Now to hear her reasoning behind her stupidity... that should be entertaining.
Now to hear her reasoning behind her stupidity... that should be entertaining.
I think you missing my point.... the State should not be in the ridicule business at all. It is supposed to treat all citizens with dignity. What people do to each other is one thing, but the State is supposed to be above that.
When in reality the state treats all citizens with a total lack of dignity. I'm surprised this doesn't happen more.
This isn't really news. No one should care. There are stupid people doing stupid stuff all the time. What it is, is humorous.
That does not answer the question. What is wrong with the punishment in this case. She was not burned at the stake, imprisoned (which she certainly could have been for reckless driving), hung, or drawn and quartered.
She was made to stand in the spot where she repeatedly drove very recklessly and hold up a sign saying only an idiot would do that.
----------
The supreme court would only hear the case to overturn an over-zealous appellate court. Unless some appellate court took the bizarre step of overturning the judges ruling. There is nothing in this punishment that is cruel or unusual. It is a community service.
----------
Thank goodness this sentence does not do any of those things. She easily could have been imprisoned. She was instead given a second chance. Driving around a stopped school bus and driving on the sidewalk are both reckless driving. Together they are easily enough to get you locked up for a bit.
----------
So then we need to take the orange jumpsuits off of prisoners picking up trash on the side of the highway. In fact, we need to get all those prisoners off the side of the highway. Wearing an ankle bracelet is public ridicule. Having to wait in line outside of your parole officers office is public ridicule. Those are just a couple of examples of people actually convicted of a crime.
By your standards, no one can be sentenced to anything but a fine or prison. We will also need to keep all trials completely secret.
The states attorney spends a significant amount of it's time and resources ridiculing people. People who have not even been convicted of anything. I am not sure what fantasy land you live in.
HUh?
Standing on a corner with a sign doesn't fit any of those.
Being embarrassed isn't cruel, unless you're a little kid.
Standing on a corner with a sign doesn't fit any of those.
Being embarrassed isn't cruel, unless you're a little kid.
It was designed to humiliate her. To put her on display for public ridicule. To assault her dignity by making her a piece of entertainment. My examples were not meant to equate her punishment with those, just that her punishment dates back to when those were also popular. A closer example would be a Scarlet Letter, I believe.
I am aware that a case rarely goes straight to the Supreme Court, which is why I used "... up to ..." which I meant to mean through the system, up to - finally - the Supreme Court. I don't know if anyone has made a serious attempt to appeal this up to (meaning through the system, up the levels, until it finally reaches) the Supreme Court. Not that care, since it's a foreign affairs issue for me.
She could have been sent back to driving school. Involves more hours of "punishment" - doesn't put her out for public ridicule and humiliation. Might actually improve her driving.
Why? It's a safety issue in that case. Highway workers wear high visibility uniforms as well. Plus the suits have nothing to do with their specific crime, while the sign holding aspect of her crime was tailored just for to humiliate her - specifically.
Then, I would suggest that you are missing the full implications of this type of punishment. Do you want to live in a society where judges attempt to find a personalized way to personally humiliate each and every petty criminal who comes before them. Because if this kind of punishment is left unchallenged, it could easily be adopted more widely.
I suppose I do live in a fantasy world. In theory we treat people with equal amounts of respect. We respect their rights to live their lives as they see fit. We support them when they are sick and down. Oh well. Back to the pirate ship, I suppose.
Ah, but it's the one thing that money can't buy your way out of.
And perhaps that's the problem he is having with this 'punishment'.
We need to clone this judge, STAT!!!!