Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Digital Audio

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Dec 29, 2012, 07:50 PM   #1
Norcal.
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
B&W P5 Vs Bose QC15

So i'm in the market for some headphones and want to hear everyones suggestions on what headphones would be best for the $300 range. I primarily listen to classic rock, hard rock, alternative, and trance.

I'm looking for quality and comfort over anything.

I've heard alot of good things about the Bose QC15's, as well as the B&W P5's. I'm looking for unbiased answers based on personal experiences, especially if you've used both of the headphones in question.

Anyways, the question is: Which are better/higher quality for music? Bose QC15 or B&W P5?
Norcal. is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 29, 2012, 09:06 PM   #2
50548
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Currently in Switzerland
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norcal. View Post
So i'm in the market for some headphones and want to hear everyones suggestions on what headphones would be best for the $300 range. I primarily listen to classic rock, hard rock, alternative, and trance.

I'm looking for quality and comfort over anything.

I've heard alot of good things about the Bose QC15's, as well as the B&W P5's. I'm looking for unbiased answers based on personal experiences, especially if you've used both of the headphones in question.

Anyways, the question is: Which are better/higher quality for music? Bose QC15 or B&W P5?
As far as noise cancellation goes, I can only say good things about the QC15 - they are probably the most important thing to carry with me in long-haul flights. Music quality is also great (I am mainly into heavy rock, alternative and some classical), although perception is obviously subjective.

I also have no issues wearing them for a long time, even though I would prefer slightly bigger cups. Battery life is OK, enough for at least one 12-hour flight...

Just be careful with generic statements that "Bose is bad" around here...I have had my QC15s for a good while now and they continue to deliver a very solid experience; not to mention that they were probably one of the first mainstream companies to release good noise-cancelling headphones.

No idea about the B&Ws, though.
50548 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 29, 2012, 09:28 PM   #3
Norcal.
Thread Starter
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by BRLawyer View Post
Just be careful with generic statements that "Bose is bad" around here..
That's something i've noticed. I've seen so many anti-bose posts that i'm unsure if they're really that bad or if this is some sort of anti-bose bandwagon trend (Kind of like how some PC people are anti-apple). It's sort of frustrating.

But anyways, I suppose i'm more concerned with quality/comfort than noise cancellation.
Norcal. is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 29, 2012, 10:11 PM   #4
ChrisA
macrumors G4
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redondo Beach, California
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norcal. View Post
That's something i've noticed. I've seen so many anti-bose posts that i'm unsure if they're really that bad or if this is some sort of anti-bose bandwagon trend (Kind of like how some PC people are anti-apple). It's sort of frustrating.

But anyways, I suppose i'm more concerned with quality/comfort than noise cancellation.
Bose has good noise cancelation technology but if you have a quiet enviroment you can get MUCH better quality sound for 1/2 the price with something like the AGK K240 Studio. These are an recoding industry standard and sell for $99 but don't cancel noise at all.

What gave Bose the bad name are their speakers. Those are not only over priced but poor. Their headphones are simply over priced (unless you ned the active noise canceling.)
ChrisA is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 29, 2012, 10:45 PM   #5
peapody
macrumors 68040
 
peapody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: baltimore, md
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norcal. View Post
So i'm in the market for some headphones and want to hear everyones suggestions on what headphones would be best for the $300 range. I primarily listen to classic rock, hard rock, alternative, and trance.

I'm looking for quality and comfort over anything.

I've heard alot of good things about the Bose QC15's, as well as the B&W P5's. I'm looking for unbiased answers based on personal experiences, especially if you've used both of the headphones in question.

Anyways, the question is: Which are better/higher quality for music? Bose QC15 or B&W P5?
I have had both and have similar musical tastes besides the trance. P5's offer a warmer sound signature, not as much of a soundstage as the qc15. Qc15 has a greater deal of clarity (probably due to the noise cancellation) but also have a decent amount of bass surprisingly. Comfortwise, P5's clamped my head and I had a great deal of fatigue after listening for hours. They are the on ear type so I felt my head squished for extended listening periods. However, pads are really comfortable so YMMV with comfort. I prefer the around the ear of the QC15. Very lightweight, does not clamp on my head, comfortable for extended listening periods. Build quality wise I'd say the P5's win out with the design and metal accents. More heavy duty and I am less scared of breaking them compared to the Qc15. At the end of the day though, I enjoy using my Qc15 more.
__________________
gadgetmac //peapody's references
peapody is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 29, 2012, 11:54 PM   #6
Destroysall
macrumors 65816
 
Destroysall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: United States
The QC15 isn't a terrible headphone by any means. It's made it to the recommendation list of Jude (co-founder of Head-Fi). As a previous member has mentioned, it does have superb noise-cancelling capabilities. The P5 as well is a nice headphone. However, I feel the better headphone would be the ESW-9 from audio technica. It's a nice headphone and it works well for most music.

destroysall.
Destroysall is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 30, 2012, 12:49 AM   #7
50548
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Currently in Switzerland
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norcal. View Post
But anyways, I suppose i'm more concerned with quality/comfort than noise cancellation.
In this case, and not meaning to be rude, I think your question is flawed from the very start - if noise cancellation is NOT a concern, you have a LOT more to choose from than just those two...
50548 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 30, 2012, 07:40 AM   #8
KimJongEun
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Are you planning to take them outside or just use at home? If the latter, Sennheiser 598 are probably the best headphone you can buy at that price range.
__________________
27" 2011 iMac, 3.1GHz i5, 8GB RAM, 1TB HD, HD6970M
Audinst HUD-MX1 USB DAC, Sennheiser HD598
KimJongEun is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 30, 2012, 08:10 AM   #9
torana355
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norcal. View Post
So i'm in the market for some headphones and want to hear everyones suggestions on what headphones would be best for the $300 range. I primarily listen to classic rock, hard rock, alternative, and trance.

I'm looking for quality and comfort over anything.

I've heard alot of good things about the Bose QC15's, as well as the B&W P5's. I'm looking for unbiased answers based on personal experiences, especially if you've used both of the headphones in question.

Anyways, the question is: Which are better/higher quality for music? Bose QC15 or B&W P5?
In general, noise cancelling headphones have fairly poor quality sound, in alot of cases you would be much better off going with some decent closed back cans. I know Denon make some of the best closed back HPs out there, the AH-D2000's are really good for the money. Another great choice would be some IEM's with noise isolation. If you must go Noise cancelling Bose do make some of the better NC cans out there, also check of the Sennheiser PXC450's.
__________________
2012 27" iMac with 680mx | 2011 13" MBA 128gb | iPhone 4 32gb | Nexus 7 16gb | Nexus 4 on Carbon and Trinity.
torana355 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 30, 2012, 02:27 PM   #10
Scepticalscribe
Contributor
 
Scepticalscribe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Kite flying
I've had the B & W P5s for a few months and must say that I find them the best headphones I have ever owned. They are extremely comfortable (the actual ear phones are made from leather), quite portable, (and not too massive), beautifully crafted, solidly made, and have excellent sound quality. I have used them on several long flights, as well as long bus and train journeys and found them very comfortable to wear.

While I used to have a set of Bose in-ear phones and found them perfectly good, I have no experience of the Bose QC15.
Scepticalscribe is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 4, 2013, 12:09 PM   #11
hleewell
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
B&W P5 is a beautifully designed headphones, probably the prettiest. The premium styling does induce people to be in the state of denial. This is not a bad pair of headphones, but it is incredibly overpriced for what it does ($330 !!!). Something like Audio Technica M50 which you can get for less than $130 on amazon, has better dynamics, bass, clarity - everything than the P5. Trust me, I have tried both on many occasions.



Another recommendation is the sub-$200 Beyerdynamic T50p
__________________
MacBook (Alum 2008)
Mac Mini (2010) - RIP
iPhone 5
iPad Air
hleewell is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 7, 2013, 05:45 AM   #12
Lunfai
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Used the QC15s on a plane ride for 10 hours, it was a dream. I'd recommend them since they it really made a difference, and when we was going to prepare for landing.... Boy did my ears feel weird.
Lunfai is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 8, 2013, 09:04 PM   #13
ChrisA
macrumors G4
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redondo Beach, California
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norcal. View Post
So i'm in the market for some headphones and want to hear everyones suggestions on what headphones would be best for the $300 range. ...
So what happens if you find some that are better for $100? Seriously what an odd way to shop. Why not decide what you need then find out what the price it.

You have selected two over priced brands. You can do better for less.
ChrisA is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2013, 11:38 AM   #14
stiwi
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Singapore
+1 on QC15. Also worth reading:
http://ericrshelton.com/2012/03/15/b...rs-wilkins-p5/
stiwi is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2013, 11:39 AM   #15
silentsim
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Qc15 is obviously better noise cancelling but the p5 sound significantly better. I own both.
silentsim is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2013, 11:47 AM   #16
stiwi
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Singapore
Quote:
Originally Posted by silentsim View Post
Qc15 is obviously better noise cancelling but the p5 sound significantly better. I own both.
I should say +1 if someone is traveling.
I can imagine P5 is better sound wise but if someone is traveling a lot and can't afford both, I would go for QC15. If traveling is not the case, I would give a try to P5 since QC15 switch on / off and battery might be annoying for some.
stiwi is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Digital Audio

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The perfect speakers? B&W/Bose? teeejay Mac Peripherals 22 Nov 29, 2012 04:08 PM
Replace Jambox & Bose SoundDock by Big Jambox or Bose SoundLink? mst90 Digital Audio 2 Jul 26, 2012 05:23 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC