As in you "seem" to be jumping to wild conclusions based on no evidence.
That's your opinion. The evidence at the moment is the pictures. It seems to be cheap based on pictures.
As in you "seem" to be jumping to wild conclusions based on no evidence.
That's your opinion. The evidence at the moment is the pictures. It seems to be cheap based on pictures.
They're pictures, and not exactly crystal clear ones at that. You can't judge materials, build quality etc from PICTURES that may not even be real!
Wow... this forums astounds me at times.
Um chill. It's an opinion. What else are forums for? I am standing by my opinion, based on the evidence set before me, that these particular iPhone cases are real and not up to Apple's taste and sensibility standards.
Prove me wrong! lmao.
You cant make a nice Rolex watch for 500$ or true Ferrari sport car for 50 000$. The same way you cant make a quality phone for 300$ non contract.
I lol'd. You think Rolexes and Ferarris aren't marked up like crazy? Or that if they were mass produced.. or not hand-built.. (Ferarris especially), they couldn't be sold much more cheaply?
You give manufacturers far too much credit.. And Rolexes are for idiots.
That's your opinion. The evidence at the moment is the pictures. It seems to be cheap based on pictures.
Cheap because it has bright colours? The iPod has bright colours
Just thought I'd post this picture. What do you guys think? Real or fake?
Complete and total fallacy.
The iPod colours are far better than this, even the new 'pastel' ones which are much worse than they used to be. There is a world of difference between bright and florescent dayglow. These colours are the same as the ones used in tacky children's toys or florescent marker pens. They are just horrible.
As for having a little faith, I think a lot of us lost that when we saw iOS 7 and the new Mac Pro. It always used to be the case that Apple products were almost universally accepted as beautiful. Their current design trends seem to be more of an 'acquired taste'.
I just hope they offer this phone in black and white.
Jony Ive cannot produce great looking designs without Steve Jobs' input. He proved that with iOS 7 and now these ugly things.
Is it just me, or does the phone look like it's considerably smaller than the iPhone5? Just an observation.
depends on how company defines 'cheap'.
Samsung definition of cheap is:
>Stuck on same version of Android for life.
>Low quality camera
>Low quality/smaller screen
>Cheap processor/Not compatible with some apps ex. Temple Run (lol)
>Build... meh
Apple don't do this. If it is now know as the cheap range it is just the price.
Build of cheap iPhone, leaked pics look crap
Processor will probably be same as iPod Touch 5, out of date, but still works.
Low quality screen/smaller screen, well compaired to new phones (HTC ONE), iPhone 5 has a below average screen, so expecting worse than for iCheap (cheap iPhone).
Low camera, yeah the iCheap will probably have a crappy camera, I am basing this off of iPh5, I expect the iCheap to be worse than iPh5, around iPod 5 specs.
iCheap! how original.
The thing is, it is just on papers at this time, while what i wrote were facts
That is very obviously a 3D render.