Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 15, 2012, 05:29 AM   #151
KnightWRX
macrumors Pentium
 
KnightWRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Quebec, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnasher729 View Post
If I disagree with her and her opinions, then obviously I do exactly what I'm doing here: I state that I disagree with her and her opinions. I state that in my opinion, which you are free to disagree with, she is looking at events through her own RDF which tells her that companies act in order to damage Open Source software, as if that was the goal.
Yes, but you seem to always post your disagreement with her opinion when we're linking to her site for transcripts of hearings or HTML versions of motion documents.

You seem to always try to discredit her entire site, all of it, even the factual bits, based on your disliking of her current opinion because it happens to clash with your personal view.

Again, we're not linking to her site for her opinion unless we state "I think Pam has some good insight here" (and I do try to post that I'm referring to her opinion when I am).

The point I'm making is stop discrediting the factual information she posts because you don't agree with her opinion. Her site is a wonderful ressource, no matter who you happen to side with if you really need to side with a faceless rich corporation that will never help you.


Quote:
Originally Posted by gnasher729 View Post
(and has also been caught with a 130 page booklet describing how their software has to be changed to be more like Apple's),
You know that booklet doesn't say that. I posted tons of actual examples from that booklet that sure as heck don't say that and even examples that say the opposite : "We're too much like Apple here, change it".

Let's not go back there, there's a thread for that, it's been discussed.


Quote:
Originally Posted by gnasher729 View Post
Of course you avoided answering the question.
Yes, I avoided answering the question because frankly, that would be trying to take Judge Koh's place. I'm not a judge. Samsung made a motion, Apple reply, the judge gets to issue a ruling. You building hypothetic scenarios and trying to trap people into agreeing with you is meaningless and frankly, not very productive. We'll know soon enough, the hearing is scheduled for December 6th if I'm not mistaken.
__________________
"What you leave behind is not what is engraved in stone monuments, but what is woven into the lives of others."
-- Pericles
KnightWRX is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2012, 01:36 PM   #152
RobertoCravallo
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Germany
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnasher729 View Post
No, the judge asked a specific question (a yes - or - no question), which he answered correctly (with a "yes") and gave an example why the answer was yes. Hogan actually more than answered the question that was asked. At least the question we see quoted here. The list of examples was incomplete, but then the judge asked a different question before Hogan could give more examples.
Now I get it! ou guys are related, right? Well he did answer, but not completely, there is just no denying that PERIOD! Why he didn't is a totally different story!
RobertoCravallo is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 04:51 PM   #153
anubis72
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by charlituna View Post
It's not really that simple. It's more about taking something specific and making it generic. If the products are too similar in appearance, physical or UI, then it becomes easier for folks to believe they are OEMs. Computer on the left is clearly made by Dell, computer on the right is clearly made by Toshiba. But they are both 'Windows computers'. By a similar token, the one on the left is clearly labeled Samsung, the right Apple, but they are both 'iPads' right? Same as how last year I got a Dell and this year I'm getting a Toshiba cause its cheaper, both they are really the same thing.

THAT is the fear. That folks will think one is the Apple iPad, the other the Samsung iPad, cause they look the same. And iPad will become a generic term same as aspirin, Kleenex, xerox and even coke
This STILL makes them dumber than a box of rocks IMHO. Seriously?! A Samsung iPad? Like I said--step away from the tech!
anubis72 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 05:38 PM   #154
kdarling
macrumors Demi-God
 
kdarling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Device engineer 30+ yrs, touchscreens 23+.
Quote:
Originally Posted by charlituna View Post
THAT is the fear. That folks will think one is the Apple iPad, the other the Samsung iPad, cause they look the same. And iPad will become a generic term same as aspirin, Kleenex, xerox and even coke
I don't think that being a generic term is necessarily a negative situation to be in.

For one thing, it means that most people will work into a store and say "I want an iPod" or "I want an iPhone" simply because it's become the common names for a music player and smartphone for many.

It goes in cycles, anyway. Before the iPhone came along, most people used "Palm Pilot" as a generic term for smartphones. You'd pull out your Windows Mobile phone and someone would nod sagely and comment, "Ah I see you brought your Palm Pilot!". Yeah. Sure. Yet I suspect that Palm was quite pleased
kdarling is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 27, 2012, 06:36 PM   #155
charlituna
macrumors 604
 
charlituna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdarling View Post
I don't think that being a generic term is necessarily a negative situation to be in.
YOU don't, but this folks that created the IP disagree. And as they created it, they have a legal right to have it stay non generic
charlituna is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apple Responds to Samsung's Request for Information on Trial Jury Foreman MacRumors Mac Blog Discussion 33 Jan 16, 2013 01:07 AM
Jury Foreman in Apple vs. Samsung Case Speaks to Rationale for Verdict MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 400 Oct 3, 2012 07:41 PM
Jury Finds Largely in Favor of Apple in Apple vs. Samsung Trial, Awards More than $1 Billion in Damages MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 1383 Sep 5, 2012 03:46 PM
Proposed Jury Form for Apple v Samsung Trial kdarling Apple, Industry and Internet Discussion 4 Aug 15, 2012 12:49 PM
Judge dismisses jury trial for Apple and Motorola case kdarling Apple, Industry and Internet Discussion 1 Jun 8, 2012 09:41 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC