Dec 2, 2012, 10:08 AM
|
#76 | ||
|
Quote:
Based on the dialog box that comes up within the new software itself, it previously WAS freeware. See the first sentence in red below:  ---------- Quote:
Thanks, Weaselboy. I had not seen that provision. |
|||
|
1
|
|
Dec 2, 2012, 02:09 PM
|
#77 | |
|
Quote:
/Jim |
||
|
|
0
|
|
Dec 3, 2012, 05:34 AM
|
#78 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
2012 2.3GHz i7 Mini, 16GB RAM; 2009 2.93 GHz C2D iMac, 8GB RAM, 640GB HD, GT120 1.83 GHz CD Mini, 2GB RAM, 200GB HD; 800 MHz 17" G4 iMac, 1GB RAM, 120GB HD 32GB White iPhone 4S, 32GB White iPad2 |
||
|
|
0
|
|
Dec 4, 2012, 06:48 AM
|
#79 | |
|
Any Upgrades in this new version?
Quote:
 ). In the time this thread has gone on (since version 3.5.1), there hasn't been one upgrade. Hmmm... I can think of some issues that could be fixed. Bet you can, too. Just saying'... The paid app model doesn't seem to be too good for fixes. Donorware worked better. Compare with Find File (Templemann) who has had numerous upgrades since going to MAS. It is much better supported on MAS  .
__________________
15" MBP(6,1) late 2010 13" MB 2009MacPro (3,1) 2009MacMini Server(6,1) 2011AEBS 802.11nGigE wired network
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
Dec 5, 2012, 05:46 PM
|
#80 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
Dec 5, 2012, 07:17 PM
|
#81 |
|
I downloaded CCC last week for free straight off their site and was able to use it without issues. I think it was a trial though.
Price isn't bad FWIW. SuperDuper! is more expensive ($28).
__________________
15" PowerBook G4, 1.67GHz, 2GB RAM, 250GB HD ; 16GB iPad2. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
Dec 5, 2012, 07:58 PM
|
#82 |
|
Couple of questions . .
I've been using CCC to clone my system drive for way over a month now - it continues to clone at 11.30 every evening and daily inform me that the clone has completed successfully. Thing is, I'm still using the demo. Whenever I open the actual application, it informs me that I'm still using the demo and asks me if i want to continue the trial. Well, sure. I know the basic cloning is included with the trial. each time it boots up, it takes maybe 10 minutes to scan the files. Is that what I would avoid by paying for the full version? Just trying to figure out my options. Also, I already own Chronosync, and didn't realize until after I'd started using CCC that Chronosync can also do bootable clones . . If i decide later to go with Chronosync, would i have to start from scratch (and risk a little dangerous non-backed up time) or would it see that CCC clone and be able to start working off that? thx Malcolm |
|
|
|
0
|
|
Feb 1, 2013, 04:49 PM
|
#83 |
|
Amyone else find 3.4.2 (the last free version) crashing on 10.8.2? I just upgraded to ML a few nights ago and went to fire up CCC to make a clone. I got the warning that "this version of CCC is not qualified" etc etc, but then instead of actually continuing to launch, it crashes instead.
If I attempt to reinstall an old 3.4.2 download it won't destroy my ability to use the free version will it? That's assuming I can actually find a source for 3.4.2 still. I agree with others though, SuperDuper (At $10 less) is looking like a better deal now that the two are both payware and competing with each other. I made a clone using it instead last night since CCC is more or less dead in the water for me right now.
__________________
20" Aluminum iMac, CoreDuo Macbook, i7 HackPro Hackintosh, 1 X iPhone 5, 1xiPhone 4S, 2xiPhone 4, 1 X iPhone3G, 1X iPod Touch, 1x AppleTV Second Generation, 2 X Apple TV First Generation.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Feb 2, 2013, 04:24 AM
|
#84 | |
|
Older (formerly donor ware) versions aren't going to run reliably in ML
Quote:
__________________
15" MBP(6,1) late 2010 13" MB 2009MacPro (3,1) 2009MacMini Server(6,1) 2011AEBS 802.11nGigE wired network
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
Feb 2, 2013, 04:50 AM
|
#85 | |
|
Quote:
I use Retrospect for my "Primary Backup". Actually, CCC and Retro have their uses in my plan. We have three machines and use both independent of each other for full back ups so there is redundant backup. At no time is any machine completely vulnerable. Scattering my backup among eight drives (my family of JBODs), in two groups - FW800, four drive set, and a group of four USB drives (PATA/SATA bare drives in a Startech drive slotted, sort-of hot swappable carrier) – all running on a recent MacMini Server, provides flexibility and sufficient space for all backups and other file sharing uses. There have been occasional drive failures and fairly easy recoveries over the past 10 years, but it's something that works. I am next planning a move of all this hardware when we sell our house. That should prove interesting. I found something that works fine, for me in my networked environment (for each app). Planning on sticking with it. Having two different apps running backup with CCC in a distributed environment seems to work well as a backup plan component. Certainly worth the price. The documentation on what's running on what machine was a little cumbersome to build (one of CCC's drawbacks is that any backup up of a single machine is best done from the machine itself, there is no server version). We developed a method to do it that's different for each app and that reliably works. Retro is more suited for server use.
__________________
15" MBP(6,1) late 2010 13" MB 2009MacPro (3,1) 2009MacMini Server(6,1) 2011AEBS 802.11nGigE wired network
Last edited by henryseiden; Feb 2, 2013 at 05:07 AM. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
Feb 2, 2013, 03:26 PM
|
#86 | ||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
0
|
|
Feb 15, 2013, 08:02 AM
|
#87 | |
|
Quote:
I am considering upgrading to ML from Snow L. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
Feb 15, 2013, 08:15 AM
|
#88 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
 |
|
| Tags |
| bombich, carbon copy cloner, ccc |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:46 PM.
