|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#201 | |
|
Quote:
![]() the 5 was released 4 months after the S3, and very obviously "superseded" the 4S...talk about dishonest representations!Are you suggesting that the 4S, released 6 months BEFORE the 4S was apple's flagship as opposed to the 5 released 4 months AFTER the S3? Come on...you can do better than that! Last edited by patentlawyer; Dec 25, 2012 at 08:10 PM. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#202 | |
|
Quote:
The quarter year in which the Samsung Galaxy S3 outsold the iPhone, the iPhone 5 was not on the market yet so the 4S was the most current iPhone on the market. Secondly, check your post. You were asking to compare the iPhone to the Galaxy S2, not the S3. Typo or what? |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#203 | |
|
Quote:
What was Apple's flagship phone when the Samsung Galaxy S3 was released? |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#204 | |
|
Quote:
Tell me, were you amazed that the 4s outsold the s2, in the quarter that the s3 was released? If not, why? |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#205 |
|
So it was the 4S, got ya. Was I amazed that the 4s outsold the S2? No, I had a 4S. Quite frankly, it doesn't bother me who sold what, it doesn't put any money in my pocket. You are trying to compare sales of different flagship models that are released at different times forgetting about the "new item" effect on that quarter sales of each company. Tell me, do you do agree that a new flagship item from a company will cause them to have an upward spike in sales for that item?
Last edited by daveathall; Dec 26, 2012 at 08:21 AM. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#206 | |
|
Quote:
I think it's ridiculous that ppl think the s3 outselling the 6 month old 4s in a quarter where the 5 was announced and released is some huge deal. Why in the world would it be?? You can't just say "so it was the 4s. Got ya" and dismiss the actual situation. The 4s outsold the s2 in the qtr where the s3 was announced and released. Same exact situation. Where's the hooplah for that? |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#207 | |
|
Quote:
Is the whole "my phone is better than your phone because it sold more?" Which is also funny since so there are those that preferred owning an iPhone when it wasn't so ubiquitous. Regardless - as long as the phone you own does everything you want and you're happy - who cares if you were the sole buyer or if millions bought the same phone as you. Just enjoy your phone. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#208 | |
|
Quote:
This very thread is a prime example of people who will upgrade(angry posts because they must now do it more frequently ), thus padding "increased sales" reports.http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1513233 |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#209 |
|
Bada
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#210 | |
|
Quote:
If a UK company made a decent phone (which none do) I might be inclined to give it a closer look than I otherwise would have. By the same token a US citizen may have more time for Apple as a company, so these figures make perfect sense. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#211 | |
|
Quote:
![]() iPhone prices (from Apple online stores): iPhone 5 16GB SIM free US - $650 + let's say 7% tax (I think that's the tax in North Carolina where a friend of mine got me a Macbook, but that of course varies depending on state) = circa $700 UK - 529 GBP = $848,95 Poland (where I live) - 2849 PLN = $898,73 Now: average monthly salary: US - $3,587 [http://www.ssa.gov/oact/cola/AWI.html] UK - 2208 GBP = $3543 [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20442666] Poland - 3399 PLN = $1072 [http://www.zus.pl/default.asp?p=1&id=24] So OK then, maybe we can agree that iPhone in the EU - expensive iPhone in Poland (also EU)- crazy expensive
__________________
• MBP 13" late 2011, 2,8GHz i7, 8GB RAM, 256 GB SAMSUNG SSD, ML 10.8 • MBP 15" HRes, matt, early 2011, 2,2GHz i7, 8GB RAM, 120GB OCZ-VERTEX3, 750GB stock HDD, ML 10.8 • iPhone 4S 64GB 2012 |
||
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 PM.








), thus padding "increased sales" reports.
Linear Mode
