Probably not. Nor has Gnasher. But that's besides the point, isn't it. Point is - it's hyperbole.
No one here knows whether there is evidence. Only whether or not it was discovered.
And you don't have to be a Samsung fan or Fandroid to think there were issues with the judgement.
Nor do I believe that those "fandroids" or Samsung fans ONLY reason for having an issue is because it a was verdict against Samsung.
Hyperbole.
Your statements are confirmation that you are unable to comprehend the Judge Koh's order.
Samsung did not do due diligence. There was no misconduct.
No retrial.
End of story
the source document:
http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/1890463/2198.pdf
That's all that this order was about.
----------
If this ever comes up again, I'm going to have read through the entire case step by step to see what I'm hitting and missing on. I've got a good idea of the overalls, but there are still some things that slip me by.
----------
Yeah? How so?
You know, if it weren't for your avatar, I wouldn't think you were cool at all.
Based on your statements, you're lost, especially as regards Judge Koh's latest order. But don't let that stop you from speculating.