Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Mar 14, 2013, 10:13 PM   #101
macrumors 6502a
LOLZpersonok's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Calgary, Canada
I'm not normally interested in new Apple stuff, but I saw this and oddly, I was like "wooo that's cool!". I don't really know why though.
Black 16GB iPhone 5 | 2.1GHz 20" iMac | Dual 1.2GHz Power Mac G4 | 867MHz 12" PowerBook G4 | 500MHz 14.1" PowerBook G3 | 350MHz iMac G3
LOLZpersonok is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 14, 2013, 10:47 PM   #102
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ph
Originally Posted by paradox00 View Post
People were aware it wasn't VESA compatible when they bought it.


1. This is an all in one, not a monitor.

2. They are welding a piece of metal onto an existing iMac. That's not free.

I do wish that VESA compatibility was standard and you could switch between the stand and the wall mount, but this is a decent option for those who need it.
I don't agree that people were aware that it wasn't vesa compatible, most probably assumed its the same as the previous generation
I used to be indecisive, but now i'm not so sure.
raniel is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 15, 2013, 05:32 AM   #103
macrumors regular
Join Date: Mar 2011
Originally Posted by Rogifan View Post
Just curious what % of customers actually wall mount their iMacs?
enough for apple to cater to them
SlugBlanket is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 15, 2013, 06:01 PM   #104
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Oct 2007
Does anyone know if it's possible to fit a Vesa mount, via some kit adaptor, to a 2011 27" iMac, so that the display is lowered and the top tilted back, like a typical laptop screen orientation (i.e., so you effectively look down on the display)?
jennyp is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 16, 2013, 12:42 AM   #105
macrumors 603
roland.g's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: One mile up and soaring
I posted mine back in 2011. I was worried that when they said the new ones were not compatible that it would affect my upgrade path in 2-3 years. This is certainly good news though I use my optical drive enough that I'm not thrilled at the idea of an external optical drive.

I am however, looking forward to an iMac that weighs 10 lbs less. My iMac is around 28-30 bs with the stand removed and the VESA adapter. These new ones are 19.2 without a stand. That moves around on an articulating arm more fluidly.

Here are some pics. I have a Humanscale M8.
BTW, both my arm which is wall-mounted and some of the other big players in articulating and swivel arms do make desk mounts and you usually order one or the other. So anyone getting this iMac could easily switch to a "stand" by getting the desk clamp mount for their arm down the line.

I know this because Tyler knows this.
You are not a beautiful snowflake. You are the same decaying matter as everything else.
roland.g is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 16, 2013, 12:51 AM   #106
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Sep 2009
Originally Posted by raniel View Post
I don't agree that people were aware that it wasn't vesa compatible, most probably assumed its the same as the previous generation
Considering it needed an adapter, I think it would be natural for people to check if the new one needed and had such an adapter. Anyone who was interested in VESA mounting at least.

In either case, the specs weren't private.


Originally Posted by Binarymix View Post
The problem is that Apple was very vague at pre-order time on whether or not the new iMac was VESA Compatible.

So the first batch of buyers didn't know it wasn't compatible, and probably assumed it was since previous 27" iMacs were. I did, until it came to light that the stand didn't come off.

I realize this isn't the end of the world, but it is yet another example, of either a) Apple screwing people, or b) Apple not having their act together on a product launch, or c) All of the Above.
Or d) people making poor assumptions.

I don't remember the pre-order stage so I can't really debate what was there. The specs page surely was though, and if it didn't list VESA compatibility, those people pre-ordering could have done something sensible, like ask....
paradox00 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2013, 04:59 PM   #107
macrumors newbie
Join Date: May 2011
Monitors in Motion Solution

You forgot to mention the $700.00 price tag…
jprokos is offline   0 Reply With Quote

MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to get the new vesa mount part only? appleluck iMac 8 Mar 10, 2014 09:15 AM
Help!!! [iMac VESA mount] swoosh0217 iMac 5 Jan 7, 2014 10:41 PM
It's official: Apple confirms that new 2012 iMacs DO NOT support VESA mounting... Relznuk iMac 17 Dec 21, 2012 05:42 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2015, MacRumors.com, LLC