Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Mac Community > Community Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 23, 2012, 07:05 AM   #1
Gutwrench
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Is string theory science or philosophy?

I can't seem to create a poll, but was interested in your thought.

1. Science, no further comment.

2. Philosophy, no further comment.

3. Probably science, immature theory but on the right track to yield scientific benefits.

4. Not science, waste of time.

5. Other
Gutwrench is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 23, 2012, 07:13 AM   #2
APlotdevice
macrumors 68020
 
APlotdevice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
It is exactly what it's name suggests: a theory. That is to say a scientific theory, which itself is defined as "a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment."
__________________
iPhone 5c - 11" Macbook Air '13 - TV - iPod touch 4 - HTPC - Numerous Consoles
There is something deeply wrong with a society more offended by breasts than by entrails.
APlotdevice is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 23, 2012, 07:16 AM   #3
SandboxGeneral
Moderator
 
SandboxGeneral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Great Lakes State
Polls are added after you create the thread. Now just edit the post and the poll options will be available to you.
__________________
Magnificent Seventh
SandboxGeneral is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 23, 2012, 07:22 AM   #4
Gutwrench
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by SandboxGeneral View Post
Polls are added after you create the thread. Now just edit the post and the poll options will be available to you.
Thank you. I think I deselected the poll option when creating the thread so it doesn't look available to me now. I appreciate the tip and will remember it.
Gutwrench is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 23, 2012, 07:23 AM   #5
angelneo
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: afk
I'm no scientist, but hasn't it evolved to M-theory? Correct me if I'm wrong

It's theoretical physics, with our current technology, it can't be proven in the strictest sense, but we can verify it by observing the results the theory implies. That being say anything in science can still be proven wrong if solid evidence is there, nothing is really set in stone.
__________________
This is good, isn't it?
angelneo is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 23, 2012, 07:24 AM   #6
SandboxGeneral
Moderator
 
SandboxGeneral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Great Lakes State
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gutwrench View Post
Thank you. I think I deselected the poll option when creating the thread so it doesn't look available to me now. I appreciate the tip and will remember it.
You can add it right now if you like. Press the edit button on your first post and scroll down to the poll section and add it.
__________________
Magnificent Seventh
SandboxGeneral is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 23, 2012, 07:24 AM   #7
Gutwrench
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by APlotdevice View Post
It is exactly what it's name suggests: a theory. That is to say a scientific theory, which itself is defined as "a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment."
Not that I really think it's philosophy but how has it ever been tested and ever repeatedly confirmed through observation?
Gutwrench is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 23, 2012, 08:03 AM   #8
Gutwrench
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by angelneo View Post
I'm no scientist, but hasn't it evolved to M-theory? Correct me if I'm wrong

It's theoretical physics, with our current technology, it can't be proven in the strictest sense, but we can verify it by observing the results the theory implies. That being say anything in science can still be proven wrong if solid evidence is there, nothing is really set in stone.
I'm guessing you are correct.
Gutwrench is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 23, 2012, 08:11 AM   #9
Huntn
macrumors 603
 
Huntn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tallest Tree in The Misty Mountains
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gutwrench View Post
I can't seem to create a poll, but was interested in your thought.

1. Science, no further comment.

2. Philosophy, no further comment.

3. Probably science, immature theory but on the right track to yield scientific benefits.

4. Not science, waste of time.

5. Other
Personally I believe it is the OPs responsibility to express some kind of an opinion or leaning when starting a thread like this. So what is it?
__________________
The modern business ethos: "I'm worth it, you're not, and I'm a glutton!"
MBP, 2.2 GHz intel i7, Radeon HD 6750M, Bootcamp: W7.
PC: i5 4670k, 8GB RAM, Asus GTX670 (2GB VRAM), W7.
Huntn is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 23, 2012, 08:31 AM   #10
Gutwrench
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
I agree and sorry I haven't done so. I'm still coming to grips with it all. I'm far from any expert, but at this stage tend to agree with angelneo---I think it's a valid theory which is adding or at least helping to add to our knowledge.

I posed the question because science requires testable and observable experiments and with our current knowledge we are unable to do that at the quantum level....particularly when dealing with the idea of strings or multidimensions. Exciting stuff though. From Newton to Einstein and Maxwell to this.
Gutwrench is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 23, 2012, 09:35 AM   #11
eric/
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ohio, United States
I'd say its a mixture. It's science for obvious reasons, but I think it's philosophy because its simply a scientific way of describing life and the pursuit of that knowledge.
eric/ is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 23, 2012, 10:04 AM   #12
monokakata
macrumors 6502a
 
monokakata's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hilo, Hawai'i
When I was in graduate school, one of my professors liked to talk about "dubious dichotomies."

"Science" versus "Philosophy" I think is one of those.

But for an interesting discussion of how many physicists looked at quantum theory as either physics or philosophy, see this book:

http://www.amazon.com/How-Hippies-Sa...+saved+physics

It might sound like a woo-woo book, but the author is a historian of science, and he's writing about real people.
monokakata is online now   0 Reply With Quote


Reply
MacRumors Forums > Mac Community > Community Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC