|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Different iPhone Sizes | |||
| Apple should have multiple iPhone sizes (like all other apple products) |
|
23 | 31.94% |
| Keep one iPhone screen size. |
|
49 | 68.06% |
| Voters: 72. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
iPhone Pro
We have 13" MBP and 15" MBP. What do you think of apple making two versions of the iPhone. 4" and a larger ~4.7"? I see people jump too quickly saying we only need one screen. Why? Apple makes multiple screen sizes for their desktops, notebooks, and even iPads now. Why not the iPhone. I think its a good direction to make everyone happy.
Also technically, apple makes two iPhone sizes now, but not at launch. Please keep this discussion intelligent. Explain why you agree or disagree. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hmm that's a great name.... Or we can just call the current iPhone as iPhone Mini
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#3 |
|
I doubt there's a need (demand) for two iPhone sizes. As long as Apple keeps putting "iPhone" on a product, regardless of the size of the screen, people will buy it. Two screen sizes creates unnecessary problems for Apple.
__________________
iMac 24" iBook G4 iPhone 4 iPod 80Gb
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#4 |
|
If they start to bring out multiple screen sizes with multiple hardware specs, just watch what happens to our beloved app store ; )
That is all.
__________________
27" Imac, 12GB ram (2009), Macbook Pro Late 2012 Time Capsule (2009 1TB) Apple TV (2012), IPhone 5, iPad (4th Gen) |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#5 |
|
I thought about this. We already have multiple resolutions and DPIs. Maybe the software needs to evolve like the desktop. Computer applications are able to scale with resolutions. What makes a touch screen device different.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Quote:
Android.
__________________
27" Imac, 12GB ram (2009), Macbook Pro Late 2012 Time Capsule (2009 1TB) Apple TV (2012), IPhone 5, iPad (4th Gen) |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Isn't it fascinating how narrow minded people can be? Fearful ... paranoid. Is Apple enjoying too much success?
These same people argued against the iPad mini, and yet Apple hasn't self destructed after creating one. But two sizes of iPhones would be too difficult? Or destroy the company? Would the app developers quit? Really? Are you sure? And just how do you know? Please tell us more, wise visionaries...
__________________
An Ultra Fast Mac Is...My Favorite |
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Ultimately Apple will only do it if they feel that it's justified by the potential profits. Right now it's probably easier, cheaper, and more efficient to mass produce one device. Plus sales haven't fallen off, but have instead increased despite the flood of large Android phones into the market. It took them a while just be able to keep iPhone 5s stocked in stores. So right now the mass market hasn't decided that it wants large 5"+ screen phones from Apple. If sales slow due to screen size, then you may see Apple react with a larger model.
Bottom line: Apple will only do it if/when the potential profit is worthwhile. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Ehh? is that not what we have now, iPhone 4s, and iPhone 5. iPad 4, iPad mini not too mention all the legacy devices like 3GS? They all have different screen sizes/resolutions and hardware specs.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Quote:
If you have two iPhone lines, the app store will be further fragmented, because there will be 2 iPhones coming out each year, and so the one with the higher spec will be the focus while the lower spec iPhone will get the boot. So what you are basically arguing for is for making the iPhone Pro the main iPhone, and the iPhone would just have the smaller 4" display that no one really wants because it is no longer the flagship. I think this discussion is moot. Apple has based the foundation of their cellular phone on the fact that it's one hand operational and has a stable and solid app store. Building a second iPhone with a larger screen is just contradictory. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#11 |
|
I'd love apple to have two sizes - a 4.3+ screen for everyone who wants that and go back to 3.5" for the other size: I haven't upgraded my 4s because I simply don't want a bigger screen (I've tried bigger screens and didn't like them at all)
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#12 |
|
The app store would be a mess. The developers would have to to script their apps for different screen sizes and just getting that approved by Apple would take even longer. The only way it would work is if the screen dimensions kept a 16:9 aspect.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#13 |
|
I'm a developer myself and I've got to say I'm in support of this, when making an app we already have to make non-retina, retina and 4" graphics. I also have a Galaxy SIII and the screen is really cool, I would love to have an Apple device that big.
The problem with Android is there are literally hundreds of devices and too many spam and useless apps in the play store. Still, apps on android aren't terrible, I think that there are some other underlying problems there such as lack of frameworks and sluggishness of the jve running on low power devices. I think Apple could pull it off. |
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#14 |
|
I'm against this. It seems too nit-picky even for Apple standards. Their phones have always been released in standard sizes, I can't imagine them changing that now. Laptops/notebooks, on the other hand, have always come in all different shapes and sizes (as an industry standard), so It's more understandable for them to provide people with variety on that front.
__________________
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#15 |
|
The reason why the iPhone experience is nirvana is because they keep it uniform. This is why android is so fragmented and sloppy.
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Quote:
They got rid of the 17" MBP, and the iPad mini uses the resolution of the iPad 2. I think it's safe to say they are trying to reduce their product line options not expand them wildly. |
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
2
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Quote:
For example, Motorola, LG, Nokia and Samsung, like any other business, are out to make as much money as possible - so they're going to release as many handsets in as many different sizes as possible - considering that they can only rely on pulling in profits via handset manufacturing (as oppose to software). Apple is unique in the sense that they aren't subject to this sort of pressure - so they don't over-complicate their phone product line (in terms of hardware). Standardization plays a huge role in their approach towards integrating simplicity and uniformity into their products.
__________________
|
||
|
|
2
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50 PM.







Linear Mode
