Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Feb 27, 2013, 03:21 PM   #351
BaldiMac
macrumors 604
 
BaldiMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleScruff1 View Post
No. I don't think Apple should be responsible for anything. Ever. They are perfect in all ways. Is that better?
No.
BaldiMac is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2013, 07:48 PM   #352
AppleScruff1
macrumors 603
 
AppleScruff1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaldiMac View Post
No.
I never said Apple should be held liable. I simply said that there may be some merit to the case. Or maybe there isn't.
AppleScruff1 is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2013, 10:17 PM   #353
maxosx
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Southern California
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidcmc View Post
So much ignorance in this thread.
True.

Insecurity, ignorance, fear uncertainty & doubt.
maxosx is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 09:31 AM   #354
BaldiMac
macrumors 604
 
BaldiMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleScruff1 View Post
I never said Apple should be held liable. I simply said that there may be some merit to the case. Or maybe there isn't.
Okay, I'll rephrase.

Why do you think that there may be some merit to the case because of signs in a third-party retailer?
BaldiMac is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 09:53 AM   #355
AppleScruff1
macrumors 603
 
AppleScruff1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaldiMac View Post
Okay, I'll rephrase.

Why do you think that there may be some merit to the case because of signs in a third-party retailer?
I don't know all the details of the case. Someone from Brazil brought up in this thread that people were knowingly mislead, hence my comment.
AppleScruff1 is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 10:05 AM   #356
gnasher729
macrumors G5
 
gnasher729's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by linuxcooldude View Post
New to me means unused in an unopened package.
You'll probably find "new" stuff according to that definition in a pyramid in Egypt.
gnasher729 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2013, 10:07 AM   #357
BaldiMac
macrumors 604
 
BaldiMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleScruff1 View Post
I don't know all the details of the case. Someone from Brazil brought up in this thread that people were knowingly mislead, hence my comment.
Why are you avoiding the question? brdeveloper brought up a claim that there was no indication that the iPad 3 was not the newest iPad in some third-party retail stores. Why do you think there may be some merit to a case against Apple based on that claim?
BaldiMac is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apple Announces December Launches for iPhone 5, iPad Mini, and Fourth-Generation iPad in China MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 37 Dec 4, 2012 04:00 AM
All iPads: Are Apple products subject to planned obsolescence? PhiladelphiaX iPad 26 Nov 18, 2012 08:44 AM
Apple Posts iOS 6.0.1 Downloads for Cellular-Capable iPad Mini and Fourth-Generation iPad MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 36 Nov 11, 2012 09:45 PM
Nexus 10 Reviews Hit the Web as Fourth-Generation iPad Sales Begin MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 310 Nov 7, 2012 03:22 PM
Apple and planned obsolescence dukebound85 Apple, Industry and Internet Discussion 28 Jun 17, 2012 08:33 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC