it's new. no one will care in a couple months and will be on to the next thing
Double? You're dreaming.
I know, I've upgraded nearly every time a new chip is released & implemented in a new MBP. They never live up to the marketing hype. It's just a fact of life and not a knock on Apple or Intel. They've got a job to do and Apple is the master at marketing. They can sell anything, how do you think they generate the billions they do, by convincing people they've got to have it at all costs.
When one keeps it in perspective it's no surprise, nor is it disappointing.
It's just a fact of life, and it's only a computer.
What does Chrome do that Safari doesn't that causes it to be more power-hungry?
I'm interested in the real world battery life. A fact that's hard to discover since most people who buy one will naturally make rather exaggerated claims. There's so many variables when it comes to battery life, we are all unique in our usage. Short of just jumping in and spending thousands to find out, it's a crapshoot.
Today I ran my 11" all day....at the end of the day there was no heat at all...practically room temperature - the metal even felt cold. Haswell is really amazing!
I have both a 2012 i7/8GB/256GB MBA and a 2013 i7/8GB/512GB MBA. It is double in real life situations.
What does Chrome do that Safari doesn't that causes it to be more power-hungry?
-Chrome has Flash, Safari does not.
-Safari is heavily optimized for Apple hardware and the OS it ships with.
-Different tab management.
-Chrome has terrible resource management!
I just tested the last item. I opened Safari and Chrome and had 4 tabs open on each, all to the same sites (CNN, Facebook, Macrumors, MacNN) Chrome is sitting at around 70% CPU usage (app is in the background) while Safari is at around 20%.
Chrome sucks!!
A single sample fails to prove anything.
i5 or i7?
I don't see why anyone would use Chrome personally unless you own a Chromebook and are forced to. Firefox seems like a better alternative if you don't like Safari. The number of extensions on Firefox far outnumbers those on Chrome.
I don't see why anyone would use Chrome personally unless you own a Chromebook and are forced to. Firefox seems like a better alternative if you don't like Safari. The number of extensions on Firefox far outnumbers those on Chrome.
I don't understand your desire to assume. My 2012 has been just fine. Perhaps you only read part of my original post then assumed the rest. Or maybe you just like violating forum rules so you can make it personal.it's your loss. I'll just be content in experiencing my 2X battery life on my 2013 MBA compared to my 2012 and you can be content in your stubbornness.
I'm just glad we have several really good browsers to choose from. They all have pros and cons.
It really reflects the fact that processor power has outstripped our need for it. Most modern programs can run on earlier generation processors just fine.
even with just 1.3ghz/4gb ram - which is apple's default for the air, it can run photoshop, logic pro, edit videos, and play mid-level intensive games with the new HD5000.
I don't see why anyone would use Chrome personally unless you own a Chromebook and are forced to. Firefox seems like a better alternative if you don't like Safari. The number of extensions on Firefox far outnumbers those on Chrome.