Wow, how thick do you have to be? You obviously know nothing about display manufacturing.
There are 3 primary companies in the world that make high performance LCD displays.
LG, Samsung, and Sharp.
Guess which are the leaders and which one is the underdog. Hint: Sharp trails the pack in innovation and has constant issues with going bankrupt and the lowest share of the sector.
Bought a Sony? Guess what. Your display is a Sharp or a Samsung.
Bought an Acer computer? Guess what. Your display is a Sharp LG or Samsung.
Bought a Dell monitor? Guess what. Samsung LG or Sharp.
If you bought a high performance display, it was made by Sharp LG or Samsung. Period.
So calling out LG for being "an inferior quality product" is like calling out VW group, manufacturers of Audi, Lamborgini, Bugatti etc for being "inferior quality" as an industrial entity. It's beyond laughable.
You literally called out one of the top two companies as being inferior.
Lets even look at this from another perspective:
Here's a list of the main LCD manufacturers:
Samsung
LG
Sharp
Here are your other choice when it comes to smaller/lower quality LDC displays, ie those for digital cameras and printers:
Chi Mei Optoelectronics
AU Optronics
Chunghwa Picture Tubes
Wistron Optronics
IPS Alpha Technology
Delta Electronics
TPV Technology Limited
Toshiba Mobile Display Company
Hitachi Displays
These companies make up 99% of LCD manufacturing.
LG & Samsung alone make up 87.5% of high performance LCD manufacturing. So yes LG and Samsung "make some of the best displays in the world", in fact between them they make 87.5% of the best displays in the world.