This probably sounds like a bizarre dilemma, but let offer some background first: I currently have a 2012 13" cMBP, and aside from the screen, I love this machine. It's quiet, it's powerful enough (for me), it doesn't give me problems, and it's portable enough that I never feel uncomfortable. I have since put in a 256 GB SSD and 8 GB of ram.
One of the things I was hesitant on before purchasing this however, was the screen of the cMBP. Aside from the eye strain that I get after working with it for extended periods of time, the small working space that I have is a bit uncomfortable for some of the things I do. I was considering buying an external Dell IPS monitor (since it seems to have such wide praise, both from my personal friends and online), but I came to an interesting realization: it would actually cost me more to buy the monitor (23-24" range that is, if I go smaller it's comparable) than it would be to sell my current machine and buy a refurbished retina.
The case for the rMBP:
Pros:
-It adheres to my minimization philosophy of having a single computing device rather than multiple, specialized units.
-It's cheaper or comparable in cost.
-Easier on the eyes, even compared to an external.
Cons:
-Newer technology that isn't quite mature yet (image retention issues, is this overblown or not?) and U/I "lag" that hasn't been fully corrected by software developers yet.
The case for the external:
Pros:
-Even compared to the 13" rMBP in scaled mode, offers superior working space.
-I don't have to give up an otherwise perfect machine.
Cons:
-Doesn't truly address the eye strain issue, in fact, the dell's anti-glare coating could actually make reading text for prolonged periods even harder.
-I'll still have to deal with the limited desktop while on the go.
-It's potentially more expensive.
This may seem like a straight-forward decision in the rMBP's favor, but are there any advantages of the external, or viewpoints that I haven't considered? The weight/footprint advantage of the rMBP is immaterial to me, although I suppose it's nice. Thanks to those who take the time to respond.
EDIT: I just want to note that the reduced size of the standard rMBP HD is not a big deal to me. As is, I only use about 50-55 GB of space anyway, and I don't see that expanding any time soon unless OS X balloons up by a massive amount in the very near future...
One of the things I was hesitant on before purchasing this however, was the screen of the cMBP. Aside from the eye strain that I get after working with it for extended periods of time, the small working space that I have is a bit uncomfortable for some of the things I do. I was considering buying an external Dell IPS monitor (since it seems to have such wide praise, both from my personal friends and online), but I came to an interesting realization: it would actually cost me more to buy the monitor (23-24" range that is, if I go smaller it's comparable) than it would be to sell my current machine and buy a refurbished retina.
The case for the rMBP:
Pros:
-It adheres to my minimization philosophy of having a single computing device rather than multiple, specialized units.
-It's cheaper or comparable in cost.
-Easier on the eyes, even compared to an external.
Cons:
-Newer technology that isn't quite mature yet (image retention issues, is this overblown or not?) and U/I "lag" that hasn't been fully corrected by software developers yet.
The case for the external:
Pros:
-Even compared to the 13" rMBP in scaled mode, offers superior working space.
-I don't have to give up an otherwise perfect machine.
Cons:
-Doesn't truly address the eye strain issue, in fact, the dell's anti-glare coating could actually make reading text for prolonged periods even harder.
-I'll still have to deal with the limited desktop while on the go.
-It's potentially more expensive.
This may seem like a straight-forward decision in the rMBP's favor, but are there any advantages of the external, or viewpoints that I haven't considered? The weight/footprint advantage of the rMBP is immaterial to me, although I suppose it's nice. Thanks to those who take the time to respond.
EDIT: I just want to note that the reduced size of the standard rMBP HD is not a big deal to me. As is, I only use about 50-55 GB of space anyway, and I don't see that expanding any time soon unless OS X balloons up by a massive amount in the very near future...