Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

mrbrycel

macrumors member
Original poster
May 18, 2010
34
0
Thinking about how this may be the last version of HDD iMacs, I was assuming this would decrease the value significantly, and it would be hard to sell in 4 or 5 years. Then I started thinking that the fusion may not be such a bad idea. But now I'm wondering if the fusion, a fancy feature that we've all wondered what happens when half fails, would decrease the value even more than a HDD. What do you guys think?

I really want SSD, but won't be able to afford 768GB. Do you think thunderbolt external SSD is the best boot drive option?
 

dasx

macrumors 65816
Jun 18, 2012
1,107
18
Barcelona
You're talking about a 128GB + 1TB drive, ie Fusion Drive.
In 5 years a 2TB SSD might probably be cheaper than a regular 1TB drive today.

In electronics... One just can't predict or even try to.
 

12dylan34

macrumors 6502a
Sep 3, 2009
884
15
The SSD and HDD are separate units that are tied together with software. If one fails, it will be inconvenient, but you can fix the problem by replacing he failed one. I'm sure there will be detailed instructions in 4-5 years explaining exactly how to do it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.