Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Applications > Mac Applications and Mac App Store

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old May 13, 2013, 11:09 PM   #1
thevisualbasic
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: May 2013
Why Firefox eat so much Ram?

Hey guys, according to the Activity Monitor the Firefox eat almost 1GB of ram. I just wonder is this right? or is there something wrong with my Mac. Also sometime my Mac eat almost 5GB of Ram, but I'm not running much. Please advise me.
thevisualbasic is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2013, 01:45 AM   #2
OLDCODGER
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Lucky Country
You don't say what OS you're running, but my early 2009 Mini, running SL, uses no more than 500MB on Firefox, and 2 - 2.5GB overall.

I did read that ML is a ram gobbler.
OLDCODGER is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2013, 02:43 AM   #3
Ice-Cube
macrumors 6502a
 
Ice-Cube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Firefox uses up quite a bit of memory as your usage progresses. I've since switched to chrome. Much faster.
__________________
sent from my iPhone.
Ice-Cube is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2013, 08:30 PM   #4
paulhannon
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Since I updated to 10.8.3, Firefox has become an insatiable memory hog! Especially on Youtube!
I'm using Safari now, vast improvement on memory use.
paulhannon is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 16, 2013, 03:58 PM   #5
dyn
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: .nl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ice-Cube View Post
Firefox uses up quite a bit of memory as your usage progresses. I've since switched to chrome. Much faster.
Very outdated information. Firefox now has the lowest memory usage and Chrome one of the highest (according to several tests by different parties). However, any web browser will eat up memory when you use it to browse around the web, especially if you browse large pictures (say wallpapers). Large wallpapers will drive up the memory usage. I've actually been able to crash browsers this way Memory should be automatically given back. You can also restart the browser to do this manually. Works with any browser.

Switching browser for speed results in almost no increase whatsoever. The differences are very small now. If you want to switch browsers then it's better to switch because of features since that seems to be the only real and notable difference between them.
dyn is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 16, 2013, 10:06 PM   #6
Mackilroy
macrumors 68040
 
Mackilroy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Send a message via AIM to Mackilroy
Firefox has always used much more RAM than either Safari or Chrome for me, across multiple OSes and systems. Windows, OS X, quad-core, dual-core, single-core, doesn't matter. Firefox is slowest and uses the most resources.
__________________
Can a mortal ask questions which God finds unanswerable? Quite easily, I should think. All nonsense questions are unanswerable.
Mackilroy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2013, 12:17 AM   #7
spacepower7
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: May 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyn View Post
Very outdated information. Firefox now has the lowest memory usage and Chrome one of the highest (according to several tests by different parties). However, any web browser will eat up memory when you use it to browse around the web, especially if you browse large pictures (say wallpapers). Large wallpapers will drive up the memory usage. I've actually been able to crash browsers this way Memory should be automatically given back. You can also restart the browser to do this manually. Works with any browser.

Switching browser for speed results in almost no increase whatsoever. The differences are very small now. If you want to switch browsers then it's better to switch because of features since that seems to be the only real and notable difference between them.
WebKit ala Safari and Chrome suck ram like vampires. Opening a 8KB text file in WebKit can take up to 20 MB ram? WTF?

Sucks when you buy a MacBook Air that you can't upgrade ram.

Also, Chrome won't let the user limit the browser cache so Chrome eats up 5-7 GB of my MBA SSD if I don't quit it every day. Why? so google has more info to track me? Nice trade off? Why would any web browser need 5GB of cache if it wasn't trying to track me and sell data?
spacepower7 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2013, 12:32 AM   #8
Mackilroy
macrumors 68040
 
Mackilroy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Send a message via AIM to Mackilroy
5-7GB? Seriously? Sounds like something else is wrong, not Google tracking you. Even with Firefox none of my caches are anywhere close to that size.
__________________
Can a mortal ask questions which God finds unanswerable? Quite easily, I should think. All nonsense questions are unanswerable.
Mackilroy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2013, 02:00 AM   #9
thewitt
macrumors 68000
 
thewitt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Memory leak.
thewitt is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2013, 07:05 AM   #10
MLinneer
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Sherman, TX
I've never seen Firefox eat that much RAM, or Safari or Chrome for that matter. 750Mb is probably the max with several tabs and streaming video too. My problem with Firefox is it's visibly slower than the other 2 and I don't care for the interface. I also miss the print preview in the Mac version... Windows has it, Safari and Chrome have it, so why do I have to print to PDF to see if a web coupon or shipping label is correct?

My own benchmarking actually has Firefox 21 as the least RAM hungry running 1 tab and just browsing for an hour, hovering under 500Mb. But it's also consistently the slowest and weakest performer. All things being equal, I prefer Chrome's UI and feature set, but it also runs my MBA 20-30 degrees hotter and cuts my battery time almost in half.
Attached Images
 
MLinneer is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2013, 07:41 AM   #11
PinkyMacGodess
macrumors 68000
 
PinkyMacGodess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Midwest America.
Firefox does the same thing on my Windoze system plus it gets into fits where it sucks so much CPU that the system literally crawls. I go into process monitor and kill all Flash and Shockwave and it comes back, but eventually Firefox gets so big that it crashes.

Firefox isn't perfect, but it has gotten better somewhat. I do tend to leave browser windows open for a few days. It seems to get worse over time without opening many new, if any, pages...
PinkyMacGodess is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2013, 07:45 AM   #12
designs216
macrumors 65816
 
designs216's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Rearranging deck chairs
Quote:
Originally Posted by thevisualbasic View Post
Hey guys, according to the Activity Monitor the Firefox eat almost 1GB of ram. I just wonder is this right? or is there something wrong with my Mac. Also sometime my Mac eat almost 5GB of Ram, but I'm not running much. Please advise me.
I have noticed that the past couple releases have seemed progressively less nimble. Thought it was just my natural impatience
designs216 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2013, 07:52 AM   #13
OLDCODGER
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Lucky Country
I fit were not for Firefox's ability to prevent auto-refresh, I would dump it in favour of Omniweb, Roccat or Maxthon.
OLDCODGER is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2013, 08:31 AM   #14
MLinneer
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Sherman, TX
Just for giggles, I checked RAM usage on my MBA 4Gb with Weather Underground animated radar, Facebook, Twitter, MacRumors forums tabs, and a separate window with iHeart Radio playing:

Firefox 21 - 533Mb (FF, Shockwave)
Safari 6.0.4 - 496Mb (Safari, Safari Web Process, Flash)
Chrome 26 - 902Mb 8 processes, 2 copies of PepperFlash running?

Chrome also made my fan come on and WU's animated radar quit cycling even with a forced reload of that tab. I noticed the Chrome process alone running around 40% CPU. I usually don't run this many tabs and a Flash feed all at the same time. I use Safari 90% of the time and I cannot remember it ever heating up to the point the fans come on.
MLinneer is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Applications > Mac Applications and Mac App Store

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC