New GPU Benchmarks for OS X! - Page 2

SNUKE · 02:58 AM

New 27" iMac maxxed spec.
No idea what this means.

GermanyChris · Feb 19, 2013, 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNUKE

New 27" iMac maxxed spec.
No idea what this means.

Image

It show that your 680MX is roughly half as powerful as the 670.

MacVidCards · Feb 19, 2013, 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GermanyChris

It show that your 680MX is roughly half as powerful as the 670.

If you look straight above at mseth's results, these are only a little slower.

So more than half.

3825/63 vs 4643/77 for GLMark

and

1735/28 vs 2001/33 for Furry

Still impressive for mobile components

GermanyChris · Feb 19, 2013, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MacVidCards

If you look straight above at mseth's results, these are only a little slower.

So more than half.

3825/63 vs 4643/77 for GLMark

and

1735/28 vs 2001/33 for Furry

Still impressive for mobile components

GiMark 2465 vs 4643
Furmark 622 vs 2001

Am I reading it wrong?

SNUKE · Feb 19, 2013, 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GermanyChris

GiMark 2465 vs 4643
Furmark 622 vs 2001

Am I reading it wrong?

You're reading my 8x anti-aliasing against a non anti-aliasing score.

So it is MacVidCards posted:

3825/63 vs 4643/77 for GLMark

and

1735/28 vs 2001/33 for Furry

GermanyChris · Feb 19, 2013, 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNUKE

You're reading my 8x anti-aliasing against a non anti-aliasing score.

So it is MacVidCards posted:

3825/63 vs 4643/77 for GLMark

and

1735/28 vs 2001/33 for Furry

OK, so I'm reading it wrong.

MacVidCards · Feb 21, 2013, 12:55 AM

This is on an EFI PCIE 2.0 GTX570 with 1280 Megs RAM and running a "regular" rom. (We have a reg and a Hi-Test)

Note the almost identical score to the iMac above.

Pretty impressive from a Mobile GPU, but a Mac Pro running a GTX580 should beat that handily.

lewdvig · Apr 10, 2013, 08:11 PM

stick that titan in there, come on!

Baunkjaer · Apr 12, 2013, 03:48 AM

eVGA GTX 570..

chaosbunny · Apr 12, 2013, 06:15 AM

point of view gtx 670:

Abulia · Apr 12, 2013, 09:51 AM

Here's the EVGA GTX 680 (Mac) card results.

Pval · Apr 12, 2013, 11:01 AM

For those interested, these are the Power, Current and Temp charts during two runs of FurMark followed by GiMark fullscreen at 2560x1600, the fans didn't kick in as loud as during some of the other benchmarks.

GP-SE · 01:29 PM

AMD Reference 7950 with EFI

mac666er · Apr 12, 2013, 01:15 PM

Evga 680 sc 2gb (pc) evga 02g-p4-2682-kr

MassMacMan · 04:08 PM

Just stuck an EVGA GeForce GTX 650 Ti into my early 2009 Nehalem quad-core 2.66 with 14GB RAM. It booted up fine, and these are my results:

I'm curious that it lists the renderer as 'Pre-Release'.

Neanderphil · 06:52 AM

I'm very impressed with the GiMark (Open GL 3.3) results, the card appears to better a standard clocked Nvidia 670, 680 and AMD 7950. The FurMark (Open GL 2.1/3.2) are less impressive, I was really hoping to beat the 7950, which the 660Ti tends to. I'm hoping it's an issue with the drivers and this result improves.

Feb 19, 2013, 02:56 AM	#26
SNUKE macrumors newbie Join Date: Sep 2012	New 27" iMac maxxed spec. No idea what this means. Attached Thumbnails Last edited by SNUKE; Feb 19, 2013 at 02:58 AM. Reason: Better Image
	0

Feb 21, 2013, 12:55 AM	#32
MacVidCards Thread Starter macrumors 6502a Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Hollywood, CA	New Top-of-Line iMac 680 = mid level 570 Mac Pro This is on an EFI PCIE 2.0 GTX570 with 1280 Megs RAM and running a "regular" rom. (We have a reg and a Hi-Test) Note the almost identical score to the iMac above. Pretty impressive from a Mobile GPU, but a Mac Pro running a GTX580 should beat that handily. Attached Thumbnails
	0

Apr 10, 2013, 08:11 PM	#33
lewdvig macrumors 65816 Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: South Pole	stick that titan in there, come on! __________________ Zealot without a cause. I run an orchard.
	0

Apr 12, 2013, 03:48 AM	#34
Baunkjaer macrumors regular Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Copenhagen, Denmark	eVGA GTX 570.. Attached Thumbnails __________________ Mac Pro 3,1, 3,0GHz [Octo], 22GB, 2180GB Intel 330 [RAID 0], 2TB, GTX 570, 2HP23xi  32GB iPad 4  32GB iPhone 5  2TB Lacie Cloudbox
	0

Apr 12, 2013, 06:15 AM	#35
chaosbunny macrumors 68000 Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: down to earth, far away from any clouds	point of view gtx 670: Attached Thumbnails __________________ >> Mac Pro 2010, 2.8 ghz, GTX 670, 16gb, 6tb \| 15" MacBook Pro 2008, 2.5 ghz, 8600m, 4gb, 250gb <<
	0

Apr 12, 2013, 09:51 AM	#36
Abulia macrumors 68000 Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Kushiel's Scion	New Mac-native GTX 680 Results Here's the EVGA GTX 680 (Mac) card results. Attached Thumbnails __________________ Mac Pro 4,1 (flashed 5,1) 6x3.33 GHz \| 12 GB \| 256 GB SSD RAID 0 \| ATI 5870 \| 27" Cinema Display
	0

Apr 12, 2013, 11:01 AM	#37
Pval macrumors newbie Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Holland	For those interested, these are the Power, Current and Temp charts during two runs of FurMark followed by GiMark fullscreen at 2560x1600, the fans didn't kick in as loud as during some of the other benchmarks. __________________ //e
	0

Apr 12, 2013, 11:43 AM	#38
GP-SE macrumors regular Join Date: Feb 2013	AMD Reference 7950 with EFI Last edited by GP-SE; Apr 12, 2013 at 01:29 PM.
	0

Apr 12, 2013, 01:15 PM	#39
mac666er macrumors member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: San Francisco, CA	Evga 680 sc 2gb (pc) evga 02g-p4-2682-kr Attached Thumbnails __________________ MacPro 5,1 24-core 3.46Ghz; 64 GBs RAM;(2) SSDs;Ext RAID 5;GTX 680+GT 630; (3) 30" ACDs 64 GB iPhone 5; 64GB 4G iPad; 15" i7 rMBP; 13" i5 MBAir; mac mini 2,1;
	0

Apr 12, 2013, 03:53 PM	#40
MassMacMan macrumors newbie Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Boston MetroWest	Just stuck an EVGA GeForce GTX 650 Ti into my early 2009 Nehalem quad-core 2.66 with 14GB RAM. It booted up fine, and these are my results: I'm curious that it lists the renderer as 'Pre-Release'. __________________ Early 2009 MacPro 5.1, 3.33 gHz hex W3680, 14 GB RAM, Samsung 840 500 GB boot SSD, 4 TB and 2x2TB HDD's Mid 2012 Retina MacBook Pro, 2.3 gHz, 16GB RAM Last edited by MassMacMan; Apr 12, 2013 at 04:08 PM.
	0

Apr 13, 2013, 06:46 AM	#41
Neanderphil macrumors newbie Join Date: Sep 2006	660Ti Results I'm very impressed with the GiMark (Open GL 3.3) results, the card appears to better a standard clocked Nvidia 670, 680 and AMD 7950. The FurMark (Open GL 2.1/3.2) are less impressive, I was really hoping to beat the 7950, which the 660Ti tends to. I'm hoping it's an issue with the drivers and this result improves. Attached Thumbnails __________________ MacPro 2009 Nehalem, 2.93Ghz Quad Core, 7GB Ram, 128gb SSD, EVGA Signature 2 660TI FTW Edition 2GB Last edited by Neanderphil; Apr 13, 2013 at 06:52 AM.
	0

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode