Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Official Complaints Over '4G' Marketing of New iPad Taking Hold in Europe
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Wirelessly posted
And has anyone in the actual countries with an issue seen an ad where Apple said you would be able to get 4G speeds, by name, in that country.
ivan2002 said:
And has anyone in the actual countries with an issue seen an ad where Apple said you would be able to get 4G speeds, by name, in that country.
Imagine you saw a headline in the Fox News newspaper that said:
Obama Caught Sleeping With Newt Gingrich's Third Wife
If you bought the newspaper and read the story, after the fold you'd read that by coincidence Barack and Callista happened to cross paths and stay in the same hotel one night.____________
Apple is putting "4G" in the headline, and "after the fold" there's fine print....
Some countries have consumer protection laws that don't allow misleading headlines even if the fine print explains it all.
AT&T calling HSDPA+ a 4G network - not a problem.
Apple building LTE into an iPad and advertising it as 4G - seriously misleading.
Not to mention that the consumer agencies are technically right, because 4G is not specifically LTE but anything > 100MBit/s. Maybe Apple should put it another way, though:
Apple building LTE into an iPad and advertising it as 4G - seriously misleading.
Not to mention that the consumer agencies are technically right, because 4G is not specifically LTE but anything > 100MBit/s. Maybe Apple should put it another way, though:
Last edited:
The question isn't about the speed of a 4G network... don't know where anyone has come up with that idea.
The issue is that "the new iPad" is being marketed as and LTE device (ignore the 4G part). There are LTE networks in the countries that are taking issue with Apple... but those LTE networks run on a frequency that the iPad does not have the ability to access.
Basically, it would be like Apple selling a Blu-Ray player overseas, saying it can play all your favorite movies... but it's a blu-ray player that only plays region 1 encoded videos (one made the in the usa) so it's a worthless device for playing movies in Austrailia since the Blu-Ray discs there would not work in the player.
This goes beyond bad marketing on Apple's part... why didn't they ship devices with compatible chips to European markets?
It's kind of also like, you can use an AT&T phone on T-Mobile's network if you put a T-Mobile sim inside. T-Mobile markets you can bring an iPhone to their network... but they have a disclaimer that warns customers visual voice mail won't be available, and that you internet speed would be limited to the Edge network only. Imagine if T-Mobile left out that disclaimer... you canceled a contract, and took an iPhone to theri network and found yourself not getting all the advertised features. This is worse because it's Apple advertising features that are useless in foreign markets.
Apple could easily have changed the ads to be more specific to the region as well. They're running the same ads over seas that they are running in the US. Just stupidity on Cupertinos part.
Maybe someone will actually notice this article from New Zealand, I emailed it to the tips email and never got a reply
Oh man europe is so crappy, using GSM everywhere rather than using our superior american free market system of having GSM in some areas and CDMA in other areas with heavy carrier lock in.
Wirelessly posted
Ok. Who?
The LTE standard is widely considered to be a true 4G tech (atleast has the potential to be). The thing is that it doesn't even work with LTE in most other countries than the US and Canada, due to differences in the frequencies used in the rest of the world.
Apple states it supports 4G via LTE, which is a blatant lie in these countries as it is unusable. It is nothing like some companies marking hspa+ as 4G, as 4G is just a marketing word and has not really been clearly defined. But apple explicitly states 4G=LTE
Edit: damn, my phone messed up and didn't show the next button on the first page, so i believed there was only 1 page... didn't mean to quote someone 30 or so pages back...
Konrad9 said:
Ok. Who?
The LTE standard is widely considered to be a true 4G tech (atleast has the potential to be). The thing is that it doesn't even work with LTE in most other countries than the US and Canada, due to differences in the frequencies used in the rest of the world.
Apple states it supports 4G via LTE, which is a blatant lie in these countries as it is unusable. It is nothing like some companies marking hspa+ as 4G, as 4G is just a marketing word and has not really been clearly defined. But apple explicitly states 4G=LTE
Edit: damn, my phone messed up and didn't show the next button on the first page, so i believed there was only 1 page... didn't mean to quote someone 30 or so pages back...
iPad 3 also mis-labeled in Switzerland.
I documented the misleading 4G branding and fine-print shenanigans on my blog: New iPad capable of 4G only in North America. Both Apple and Swiss mobile carrier Swisscom are guilty of sending misleading messages about the capabilities of the new iPad.
In short, I ordered the iPad 3 (The New iPad) as soon as it was available. There is a nascent 4G network here in Switzerland, and I was disappointed to learn that the WiFi + 4G model will not work on this network. Apple was very cooperative, and allowed me to return the iPad for a full refund. They helped me place an order for an ordinary WiFi model. Unfortunately, placing a new order meant going back to the end of the line. I will have to wait two more weeks before the replacement iPad will even ship.
Both Apple and Swisscom market the new iPad as being capable of 4G. Both tout the high speed of wireless connectivity alongside the 4G branding. They both reveal the fact that the device is incapable of 4G in Switzerland only indirectly, and only in fine print. They both market the product in a way that is likely to confuse many consumers.
Apple has already updated some of its marketing in Switzerland, replacing a 4G icon with a simple network tower icon on the iPad Features page. Unfortunately, the iPad is still sold as WiFi + 4G on the online Apple Store for Switzerland.
I documented the misleading 4G branding and fine-print shenanigans on my blog: New iPad capable of 4G only in North America. Both Apple and Swiss mobile carrier Swisscom are guilty of sending misleading messages about the capabilities of the new iPad.
In short, I ordered the iPad 3 (The New iPad) as soon as it was available. There is a nascent 4G network here in Switzerland, and I was disappointed to learn that the WiFi + 4G model will not work on this network. Apple was very cooperative, and allowed me to return the iPad for a full refund. They helped me place an order for an ordinary WiFi model. Unfortunately, placing a new order meant going back to the end of the line. I will have to wait two more weeks before the replacement iPad will even ship.
Both Apple and Swisscom market the new iPad as being capable of 4G. Both tout the high speed of wireless connectivity alongside the 4G branding. They both reveal the fact that the device is incapable of 4G in Switzerland only indirectly, and only in fine print. They both market the product in a way that is likely to confuse many consumers.
Apple has already updated some of its marketing in Switzerland, replacing a 4G icon with a simple network tower icon on the iPad Features page. Unfortunately, the iPad is still sold as WiFi + 4G on the online Apple Store for Switzerland.
Ha, good luck with that. You probably mean October 2013?
But besides that, no, it will not work with Orange, as no device will as Orange uses again other frequencies. Not the US ones nor the European once but something in between (1800Mhz). And do not think its the same 1800 Mhz t-mobile is using in Germany (so they are not compatable with the 2600 Mhz from Vodafone) because they use different bands within this frequency. As is Vodafone in Germany, there LTE phones (dissmal performance) are not even compatible with there own network outside there 2600Mhz range as they also use 800Mhz and 700 Mhz (of course different bands to the American 700Mhz.)
Take your shiny 2600Mhz Vodafone Phone from Germany and try to log on a few km up north to a 2600Mhz LTE in Sweden. NOT.
Same in the UK, within proposed networks you will have different frequencies and bands to cope with, some frequencies are not even auctioned yet, nobody knows what and when its coming.
In the mean time we can in Europe enjoy 4G speeds (even if nitpickers refuse to call it 4G) without any frequency or band trouble with up to 42Mbit/s over HDSPA+DC networks, they are faster then LTE (exept in some small cells in Sweden, where there are theoretically slightly faster speeds) use less battery, are cheaper and are supported by the new iPad.
----------
Really? The iPhone 4 couls roam in CDMA Networks?
This just occurred to me: if Apple had withheld the "4G" model from the rest of the world instead, just selling it in the USA and Canada, we would be reading about how the rest of the world was upset that Apple was not offering the "4G" model to them. It was already made apparent that Apple could not possibly offer an iPad that had every band for every carrier in the world, at least not yet as the tech has not been brought to market. Also, I do not recall anyone being forced to purchase an iPad, and to that effect I also do not recall Apple having an "All Sales FINAL" sign on any of their stores that I have been to.
It sucks that they are touting the new iPad as "4G", but is it not our responsibility as consumers to research a product before we shell out more than $600 for it? I looked on the box and it said "4G", so it must "just work" right? Wrong, one should check to see if it works first with the carriers in their country, and second in their area. Anyone who buys the iPad with 4G only to find that it doesn't work where they live is obviously ill-informed, and gets no sympathy from me.
It sucks that they are touting the new iPad as "4G", but is it not our responsibility as consumers to research a product before we shell out more than $600 for it? I looked on the box and it said "4G", so it must "just work" right? Wrong, one should check to see if it works first with the carriers in their country, and second in their area. Anyone who buys the iPad with 4G only to find that it doesn't work where they live is obviously ill-informed, and gets no sympathy from me.
Brilliant idea! No 4G and no 3G/UMTS for them foreigners.
There you go. Problem solved.
Apple has separate Wifi+4G model for AT&T and for Verizon but no-one else.
Makes perfect sense to me.
No, it'd be more like if Ford advertised a car that could go 100+ mph, but only in the US. If you tried to drive that fast on the Autobahn, it would stop at 65 mph.
Actually, more like if you were allowed on the main roads but not on the autobahn.
You can still go from A to B but slower.
For Apple this perfectly acceptable. Would it be for Ford?
I don't care, people who buy the iPad 3 are stupid dumb ****s.
Seriously, outside the marketing or PR ******** and lies, I know nobody who uses the iPad intensively as a laptop or a smartphone replacement.
And although for once I recognized that the iPad 2 was one of the best update and release in these Apple days where innovation, quality and power are completely gone, the iPad 3 is complete joke.
Paying the same price one year after for a fatter tablet with battery problems just to have a display that you can't see pixels of if you look stupidly closely...
Yes let's talk about the stupidity of the Retina Display: I could understand why the iPhone 4 that had several new features including the Retina Display was okay as a bonus, but otherwise people are so dumb that they forgot the primary use and interest of a new device; for it to be innovative, more powerful and better designed/programmed so the use of it is more efficient and friendly. Now what's the point of a ****ing tablet with a resolution higher than a effin 1080p TV screen? "Sharper" angry birds? "Crispier" texts from you Mum ?
Seriously, outside the marketing or PR ******** and lies, I know nobody who uses the iPad intensively as a laptop or a smartphone replacement.
And although for once I recognized that the iPad 2 was one of the best update and release in these Apple days where innovation, quality and power are completely gone, the iPad 3 is complete joke.
Paying the same price one year after for a fatter tablet with battery problems just to have a display that you can't see pixels of if you look stupidly closely...
Yes let's talk about the stupidity of the Retina Display: I could understand why the iPhone 4 that had several new features including the Retina Display was okay as a bonus, but otherwise people are so dumb that they forgot the primary use and interest of a new device; for it to be innovative, more powerful and better designed/programmed so the use of it is more efficient and friendly. Now what's the point of a ****ing tablet with a resolution higher than a effin 1080p TV screen? "Sharper" angry birds? "Crispier" texts from you Mum ?
Retina + 4G was the reason that I bought the "new" Ipad.
Here in Sweden: when we check out of Apple store we are offered free 1 month 4G data service. Of course I believed it was LTE, not 3.5G.
Sweden was the first country with LTE test network in 2009. Ipad is equipped with LTE.
How am I as a consumer going to know that Apples LTE is not compatible with our real LTE?
I was going to switch my ADSL to LTE and use Ipad as a hotspot. In Sweden we still have real unlimited dataplans and LTE was only 5-10 dollars more expensive then my ADSL connection.
I hope for a refund.
----------
Just a small correction.
The first LTE network was in Sweden, but Ericsson did not deliver the base stations. Huawei did.
----------
Nope
USA have always protected its own industry. Wrong or right. Thats why they don't follow international standards. There are many examples
TV: NTSC 3G: CDMA. LTE: wrong radio and so on...
Here in Sweden: when we check out of Apple store we are offered free 1 month 4G data service. Of course I believed it was LTE, not 3.5G.
Sweden was the first country with LTE test network in 2009. Ipad is equipped with LTE.
How am I as a consumer going to know that Apples LTE is not compatible with our real LTE?
I was going to switch my ADSL to LTE and use Ipad as a hotspot. In Sweden we still have real unlimited dataplans and LTE was only 5-10 dollars more expensive then my ADSL connection.
I hope for a refund.
----------
Just a small correction.
The first LTE network was in Sweden, but Ericsson did not deliver the base stations. Huawei did.
----------
Nope
USA have always protected its own industry. Wrong or right. Thats why they don't follow international standards. There are many examples
TV: NTSC 3G: CDMA. LTE: wrong radio and so on...
So what you are saying is, that you informed yourself about LTE, your Provider and Apple told you that you can conect to your swedisch LTE Network, even giving you a month free service and then, after you bought the device and signed the contract, they all over sudden changed there mind?
That would indeed be rather strange. Off course you will get a refund. Since you found out about that probably Minutes after you tried to connect, there should be no problem at all.
Just one question, the iPad actually connects in Sweden FASTER then the LTE average over HSDPA+DC and could be used as a hotspot (as you wanted to), so why the big deal about LTE?
Besides, if you just want a hotspot, why not just take the free LTE-Wireless Hotspot from your provider? Is a new iPad there not a bit overkill?
