Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > Mac mini

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Feb 12, 2013, 05:32 PM   #76
gnasher729
macrumors G5
 
gnasher729's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by motrek View Post
The only advantage of Fusion drive over an SSD cache is that you can use the combined drive space to store data. But with Apple's current Fusion drive sizes (1TB + 128GB) I don't see that as a meaningful advantage. I'd much rather have a cache drive system.
By far not the only advantage, and by far not the most important.

The real reason is this: The way that Fusion works, every bit of data has exactly one spot on the combined hard drives where it is supposed to be. The exact spot can change over time, but it's always one place. As a result, if things go wrong, your computer crashes, or power goes down, everything is always where it belongs, minimising the potential damage.

With a pure read cache, the same would happen, but 128 GB read cache only would be idiotic because it doesn't accelerate writes. With a 128 GB read / write cache, everything that is in the cache now has two locations where it should be: One in the cache, and one on the hard drive. You always have substantial amounts of data that is not in the place where it belongs. So when things go wrong, you're in trouble.

Add full disk encryption to the picture, and using 128 GB as a read/write cache is something that I personally wouldn't want to have to implement. What Apple did is very simple, very effective, and very easy to get right.
gnasher729 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2013, 05:39 PM   #77
motrek
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnasher729 View Post
... With a 128 GB read / write cache, everything that is in the cache now has two locations where it should be: One in the cache, and one on the hard drive. You always have substantial amounts of data that is not in the place where it belongs. So when things go wrong, you're in trouble. ...
Strongly disagree. If you're using an SSD as a read/write cache you can just assume whatever data is on the SSD is the most recent version. It's ridiculously simple and robust.
motrek is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > Mac mini

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Haswell iMac - Fusion drive or No Fusion drive? NbinHD iMac 14 Sep 24, 2013 02:00 PM
VMware Fusion 4 and Fusion Drive Kilamite Mac Applications and Mac App Store 0 Apr 24, 2013 04:54 AM
Going from a rig with 7200 drive, will the 5400 side of a Fusion drive annoy me? Whackintosh iMac 9 Feb 25, 2013 04:46 PM
27in 2011 iMac Fusion Drive & removing optical drive ZMacintosh iMac 1 Jan 21, 2013 11:24 PM
Opinions for upgrading processor or hard drive (fusion drive) Agent Moose iMac 4 Dec 2, 2012 07:14 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:56 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC