Modern CPUs & systems do not have a FSB. Regarding the latency:Would memory with a lower CAS Latency (9 vs 10) have a correlation to more efficient FSB?
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4503/sandy-bridge-memory-scaling-choosing-the-best-ddr3/5
Modern CPUs & systems do not have a FSB. Regarding the latency:Would memory with a lower CAS Latency (9 vs 10) have a correlation to more efficient FSB?
I don't get what you mean?
----------
So your saying having all those applications open at once will require 32GB of ram?
My Early-2011 Sandy Bridge i7 Quad-Core MBP supports also 32 GB RAM:I noticed that some 2012 MBPros can handle 32GB...
More in the range of ≈ 800 US$ (x2 = 1600 US$):They would be what, $400 each if they existed?
No, the CPU is much faster than the RAM.32gb in my notebook would be fantastic. CPU as bottleneck.
Modern processors have no FSB, AFAIK. And the CAS latency is only responsible for the error correction on the RAM module. Has nothing to do with the bus speed.Would memory with a lower CAS Latency (9 vs 10) have a correlation to more efficient FSB?
I agree 100 %. In my tests RAM cache improves the read performance for larger (and smaller) files substantially. A read operation from the RAM cache is around 5 times faster than a direct read operation from a HDD/SSD.You don't need that because you already have that. Read up on the disk cache. That is a dynamic write and read cache in RAM it grows as needed and as long as there is space.
So my question is what do you need a 32GB in a RMBP for? What applications are you running and what softwares need that much ram? Please list anything that comes to mind that takes up alot of ram.
Thanks
hardwickj & Doward, thanks for your posts! I agree, because i've a similar problem.
Good for you.99% of people dont even need 16gb of ram lolz
My 17" MacBook Pro is my baby. I've got lots of other very nice machines around, but I end up always using the 17" because it's everything I generally need in one place. I removed the optical drive in favour of a second hard drive. And while 16GB gives me enough to work with, I would use 32GB if it were an option...
I sure hope 16GB DDR3 SODIMMs arrive, though I'm skeptical as it seems like this is an old thread.
Would this work in a MBP?
http://www.provantage.com/crucial-technology-ct2k16g3ersld4160b~BCIAL6UN.htm
I am currently in the market for a MBP but it *MUST* have 32GB of memory to run the VMs I need.