Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Canon C100 AVCHD vs Ninja 2 comparison.

MIDI_EVIL

MIDI_EVIL

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jan 23, 2006
1,320
14
UK
This isn't very scientific, and there's not 'much' to see, but I grabbed this comparison shot yesterday as I was leaving work.

The first image is a screen grab from the AVCHD internal codec writing to SDHC @ 24mbps, 8 Bit 4:2:0.

The second image is a screen from the Ninja 2 footage, which was captured @ 220mbps, 10 Bit 4:2:2.

This has allowed me to turn the C100 from a £5,000 camera into a £10,000 one!

Hopefully this is of some interest to a few...
 

Attachments

  • internal24mbps.png
    internal24mbps.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 305
  • prores220mbps.png
    prores220mbps.png
    2.3 MB · Views: 257
T

The Man

macrumors 6502a
Jul 7, 2004
612
225
C100 seems like a very good buy, but often dismissed because of its internal AVCHD codec and lack of 1080p60. But I think the c100 has a nice image from what I have seen, and is versatile once you record externally. It's so very compact, and the battery last very long.

----------

I mean, if you need 1080p60 for some shots, you can now buy a cheap GH3.

Of course, the Sony FS700 is good, but not so compact.
 
K

KeithPratt

macrumors 6502a
Mar 6, 2007
804
3
Looks like the field order is set incorrectly (i.e. set to 'upper' or 'lower' rather than 'progressive') for the first image.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom