Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Mac Community > Community Discussion > Politics, Religion, Social Issues

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jun 27, 2013, 11:11 AM   #26
citizenzen
Thread Starter
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by jnpy!$4g3cwk View Post
Most justices will claim to be textualists or originalists, yet, given a specific case, they come to very different conclusions, depending perhaps on their temperaments among other things.
And speaking of textualists, here's a some text that I believe is germane ...

Quote:
U.S. Constitution

AMENDMENT XV

SECTION 1.

The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

SECTION 2.

The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxv
So when congress passed the VRA. they were fulfilling the exact duty that the 15th Amendment laid out. It would seem to me that a textualist would be far more careful about exerting the Court's power in this matter when it's so clearly stated to be a matter for congress to decide ... which it did.
citizenzen is online now   1 Reply With Quote


Reply
MacRumors Forums > Mac Community > Community Discussion > Politics, Religion, Social Issues

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:45 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC