I m sorry, and I mean no offense, but this reads like such a huge pile of horse manure to me..."
I am not sorry for these comments, and it may or may not offend you, but most of your posts read "like such a huge pile of horse manure to me"
In your short tenure within this community you are on a bashing orgy - can't understand why you waste your time here with all the vitriolic rhetoric - steady stream of complaints.
Do you even own a 2012 iMac with a 5400 rpm hdd? I do, along with other iMacs, 17" MBP, Mac Pro, iPads, iPhone 5s, Apple TV. I have a lot of Apple equipment and many years with it. No, I'm not a fan boy blinded to Apple products - but it is an excellent ecosystem from my experience. What Apple gear do you own?
I no longer care for Microsoft or Mercedes - I don't spend time on those forums.
Two imacs, two macbooks, a powerbook, a mini, two ipads. I think your liking apple biases you towards my posts. I don't mind you thinking my posts are horse manure btw, it's a free country. . I was making some points though with arguments you are doing an ad hominem instead.
If so, then why are you buying an iMac? Not criticizing; just don't understand the point of paying for an iMac when it sounds like a Mini might do.
Whatever you were seeing there, it looks like they fixed it - you can do 16GB as 2x8GB, or 8GB as 2x4GB, but there are only two RAM slots. I think I was mis-remembering the stock RAM in the mini (it's 4GB, not 8GB as I was thinking), so if you just want 8GB, you're fine, but you'll have to pull the existing 4GB and replace it with whatever you want.
It booted slow, launched apps slow, iTunes was slow, iPhoto was slow, Mail was slow (several large accounts), booting or restarting my VMWare instances slow. [...] I then installed the SSD and the thing flies.
More opinions don't always mean they are correct. Toms hardware website has good info on this also.thanks for the link, I 'll have a look at it. Your opinion of them however is really divergent from the common view of them.
Thanks - that's exactly what I'm looking for. iTunes is a huge reason for this new machine, and it's sluggish enough on its own that I don't want anything slowing it down further.
At this point, I'm completely sold on the SSD. Odds are 90+% I'll do it via a mini, since the total cost is several hundred less than an equivalent iMac.
one other data point for you. I had responded earlier. I have the base 21.5 . Specific to iTunes, my library is just over 23000 songs and 125 movies. Itunes launches in about 4 seconds (two bounces in the dock). I have no idea how my library compares to yours, but 4 seconds seemed reasonable to me.
I also have not noticed any lag in scrolling through my collection, even when listing by songs which seems to be the slowest mode for iTunes.
Hope that is helpful
I'm sorry that you are such an obvious arrogant ###. Love those "i am superior to thou pronouncements" Go back to your fantasizing while running blackmagic 37 times in a row.
"elite haxxor" contingent that obsess over 1.5% differences in benchmarks and scream that things are "heartbreakingly slow" when in reality we are often talking about fractions of a second.
Sadly i cant go any deep because of language barrier but i will leave these link so you take a look, concept its the same:
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/ou/how-higher-rpm-hard-drives-rip-you-off/322
Wow...take it easy buddy.
If you want your opinion to go unchallenged you might not want to post in forums. You claimed that you and your boss were the superior experts and the rest were nitwits of the...
...so save me the "superior than thou" lecture.
And what the hell is blackmagic?
Wow, you just can't help yourself can you?
And just to be clear, what I posted was not anger but unfiltered contempt specifically for you......
A couple of things jump out at me.
First, the article is 6 years old.
Second, the article compares 15K vs 10K and then 7.2K, and is juggling capacity as well as speed, and talking about price/performance. It's all interesting enough, but has nothing to do with whether a 5400 is effectively slower than a 7200.
I've had 15K drives and 10K drives (SCSI, in my AlphaServer) and they were low capacity but they did what they needed to. In their day, they were dynamite. Now, a joke -- the 15K drive is 18 gb.
There's really no comparison there -- what's needed is a reasonable comparison between 5400 and 7200 drives of the same or at least similar capacity.
At this point, I'm completely sold on the SSD. Odds are 90+% I'll do it via a mini, since the total cost is several hundred less than an equivalent iMac.
Thanks - as with all of the replies, that's very helpful. Maybe I should do a mini after all (which I can easily upgrade to an SSD)... Decisions, decisions!
I've just ordered 28 of the base model for my department at work. I'm not so much bothered about them not being SSD, what i'm more bothered about is whether it is actually slower than the 7200rpm drive in the 2011 base model that it replaced. Mostly for starting up and opening applications, as everything else for us will be network based anyway, even user folders. I'm hoping to do a video of boot times comparisons between the 2011 and 2012 base models when we get them, as everyone who has done these comparisons has focused on the Fusion Drive.
I've just ordered 28 of the base model for my department at work. I'm not so much bothered about them not being SSD, what i'm more bothered about is whether it is actually slower than the 7200rpm drive in the 2011 base model that it replaced. Mostly for starting up and opening applications, as everything else for us will be network based anyway, even user folders. I'm hoping to do a video of boot times comparisons between the 2011 and 2012 base models when we get them, as everyone who has done these comparisons has focused on the Fusion Drive.
Gosh, replacing 2011 hardware that runs on a network already? Our organisation has a ten year turn around on "Enterprise Windows hardware" - we too run a virtual network, and we are still using XP.
Thanks - that's exactly what I'm looking for. iTunes is a huge reason for this new machine, and it's sluggish enough on its own that I don't want anything slowing it down further.
At this point, I'm completely sold on the SSD. Odds are 90+% I'll do it via a mini, since the total cost is several hundred less than an equivalent iMac.