Originally Posted by harlequinn
Unless you state clearly why you think he should be joking or trolling then all you've done is make an unsubstantiated line of questioning designed to cast aspersion upon his statements.
How about you say why Samsung shouldn't be defending their patents (which it took US nepotism to overturn Samsung's win in the presidential review).
BTW I think that just about all tech patents are ********, especially software and design patents.
Nothing wrong with defending your patents, but SE patents shouldn't be used as weapons to get concessions from your opponent in obtaining their
non-SE patents. Also, in light of the above
, stating "There is one and only one guilty party in whole this mess - it's Apple. They started it and they are losing it" is
an inflammatory and trollish statement, in this context. Hope that answers your question.
Now can you please explain how Obama's veto of the Apple device ban is, as you assert, nepotism?