|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
A number of Android tablets have GPS without Cellular.
So why is Apple forcing you to get Cellular if you just want GPS? Some guesses I have is: Shared antennas. Cellular (Qualcomm?) chip includes both functions. A-GPS (using cellular to quickly download updated satellite data) or all of the above? Also a ? about A-GPS, does one get the satellite data even if you do not subscribe to cellular service??? EDIT:Wiki says "For billing purposes, network providers often count this as a data access", so this suggest it does require subscription, but not conclusive.
__________________
FireWire 1394 Intelligent network guaranteed data transfer, 1500mA power, Ethernet compatible Read: 160 files, 650MB total, FW400 70% faster then USB2 Write: 160 files, 650MB total, FW400 48% faster Last edited by PracticalMac; Dec 12, 2012 at 09:29 AM. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#3 |
|
It's combined because its the same SOC; System-On-A-Chip is a sigle component.
A-GPS is just like regular GPS but it is assisted by cell towers and wifi networks to find your location quicker. The A doesn't mean they are downloading data, it just means the cell-towers triangulate your position quicker.
__________________
Lego Apple Store |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Quote:
AGPS does not use Cell Towers for location. AGPS might use the signal quality measurements off *a* single tower, but it does not triangulate.
__________________
FireWire 1394 Intelligent network guaranteed data transfer, 1500mA power, Ethernet compatible Read: 160 files, 650MB total, FW400 70% faster then USB2 Write: 160 files, 650MB total, FW400 48% faster Last edited by PracticalMac; Dec 12, 2012 at 12:28 PM. Reason: a |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Quote:
That's not entirely correct. It doesn't use cell tower triangulation but GPS is basically triangulation. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
FireWire 1394 Intelligent network guaranteed data transfer, 1500mA power, Ethernet compatible Read: 160 files, 650MB total, FW400 70% faster then USB2 Write: 160 files, 650MB total, FW400 48% faster |
|||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#7 |
|
I've read some data from the cell towers is downloaded to more quickly establish location of satellites, so it can use some data. I need a reference though.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#8 |
|
__________________
FireWire 1394 Intelligent network guaranteed data transfer, 1500mA power, Ethernet compatible Read: 160 files, 650MB total, FW400 70% faster then USB2 Write: 160 files, 650MB total, FW400 48% faster |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Found some answers:
iPad 3 (and iPhone 5) use Qualcomm's RTR8600 multi-band/mode RF transceiver for 3G and 4GLTE bands which includes GPS services. I think it is because of the SoC in the RTR8600 one gets "aGPS" (AGPS) I do think the antenna is separate, however. Likely cheaper to used a combined system then separate chips. Any other opinions?
__________________
FireWire 1394 Intelligent network guaranteed data transfer, 1500mA power, Ethernet compatible Read: 160 files, 650MB total, FW400 70% faster then USB2 Write: 160 files, 650MB total, FW400 48% faster |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#10 |
|
That's certainly the reason it's true in the iPad - no dedicated GPS chip. Any other answers are Apple business decision speculation.
__________________
20" Aluminum iMac 7,1 (mid-2007, Santa Rosa,) upgraded to 2.6 GHz Penryn, 6 GB RAM, 1 TB HD, 4 TB total external hard drive |
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#11 | |||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The standalone GPS chips that you might find in a TomTom or Magellan GPS are not really suitable for a mobile device. |
||||||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#12 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Quote:
one items puzzles me. It sounds like the GPS will "build" a library of data listening to the satellites. But for Assisted, does it instead receive a file of like data? I also assume if in with Wi-Fi connection to internet it will also download the data (as in Cell is turned off).
__________________
FireWire 1394 Intelligent network guaranteed data transfer, 1500mA power, Ethernet compatible Read: 160 files, 650MB total, FW400 70% faster then USB2 Write: 160 files, 650MB total, FW400 48% faster |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#14 | |||
|
No problem!
Quote:
The receiver listens to that data and compares the timestamp of the satellite to the time when the message is received. Knowing the location of the satellite and how long it took to receive the signal tells you where you are on the planet. It takes a comparatively long time to listen for long enough to get all the location information from the satellite, because it is a fairly low bandwidth transmission. That's where assisted GPS comes in. Quote:
That's what makes it faster to find your location with aGPS. Quote:
|
||||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Quote:
Uh...... Thanks?
__________________
20" Aluminum iMac 7,1 (mid-2007, Santa Rosa,) upgraded to 2.6 GHz Penryn, 6 GB RAM, 1 TB HD, 4 TB total external hard drive |
||
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59 AM.







Linear Mode
