Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Mac Community > Community Discussion > Politics, Religion, Social Issues

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jun 27, 2013, 11:11 AM   #26
Thread Starter
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Mar 2010
Originally Posted by jnpy!$4g3cwk View Post
Most justices will claim to be textualists or originalists, yet, given a specific case, they come to very different conclusions, depending perhaps on their temperaments among other things.
And speaking of textualists, here's a some text that I believe is germane ...

U.S. Constitution



The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.


The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
So when congress passed the VRA. they were fulfilling the exact duty that the 15th Amendment laid out. It would seem to me that a textualist would be far more careful about exerting the Court's power in this matter when it's so clearly stated to be a matter for congress to decide ... which it did.
citizenzen is offline   1 Reply With Quote

MacRumors Forums > Mac Community > Community Discussion > Politics, Religion, Social Issues

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RAM guide contradicts Newegg Ajwatuc MacBook Pro 1 Mar 20, 2013 08:44 AM
Scalia Calls Section 5 of Voting Rights Act a Racial Entitlement rdowns Politics, Religion, Social Issues 9 Mar 1, 2013 03:51 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013,, LLC