Just wondering if any of the Nikon wildlife photographers have given any thought to the new 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VRII lens.
Here: http://en.nikon.ca/Nikon-Products/Product/Camera-Lenses/2208/AF-S-NIKKOR-80-400mm-f%252F4.5-5.6G-ED-VR.html#tab-ProductDetail-ProductTabs-Overview
I have the 70-200mm f/2.8 which is an absolutely outstanding lens. But, with the TC 2.0 III attached to get me to that invisible and all important line of 400mm, I'm not impressed. For me, this combo is soft (even stepped-down) with slow AF that produces far more misses than hits.
I know it's very expensive but, given the reach and the fact that the next step up to the great Nikon primes at 3, 4, 5 & 600mm will break the bank and possibly my back, is anyone considering this purchase? And, are the Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 happy with their set-up?
Peter
Here: http://en.nikon.ca/Nikon-Products/Product/Camera-Lenses/2208/AF-S-NIKKOR-80-400mm-f%252F4.5-5.6G-ED-VR.html#tab-ProductDetail-ProductTabs-Overview
I have the 70-200mm f/2.8 which is an absolutely outstanding lens. But, with the TC 2.0 III attached to get me to that invisible and all important line of 400mm, I'm not impressed. For me, this combo is soft (even stepped-down) with slow AF that produces far more misses than hits.
I know it's very expensive but, given the reach and the fact that the next step up to the great Nikon primes at 3, 4, 5 & 600mm will break the bank and possibly my back, is anyone considering this purchase? And, are the Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 happy with their set-up?
Peter