Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > iMac

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 29, 2012, 11:28 AM   #26
gagaliya
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
27" $1999 base

BTO:
i7 - not very useful for day to day but for $200 it's an okie upgrade

1tb Fusion - temp solution, should provide good performance boost since the entire os will run off ssd

680mx - must have, best $150 you can ever spend on the imac

Applecare - brand new design, day 1 order, AIO nonremovable parts, and host of issues previous imacs had, and the $3000 price tag for the imac i want, this is a must.

DIY:
32GB memory upgrade - no brainer, 2 min easy job

External TB SSD or replace internal with SSD - both options will have to wait obviously, as currently all the ext thunderbolt ssd solutions are crap or very expensive. And we dont know if the internal hdd can be upgraded yet.

That's why I opted for the fusion drive, it may be throw away but for $200 and able to run the entire os on ssd i will use it as a temp solution.

Net net looking at around $3000 shipped not including ssd upgrade.

bat***t crazy..but i still want it.
gagaliya is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 29, 2012, 11:56 AM   #27
tann
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Nottingham, England
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spiffious View Post
Render times don't matter that much to me, I care much more about the machine feeling fast and responsive while working on projects.
FOR SURE a fusion drive then. It will feel significantly faster and more zippy than without.

For the CPU vs GPU upgrade I honestly don't know, I hear when my friends talk about it that the i7 can make a big difference for rendering. I'm not sure though, so I would look at other posts for that.

I know that you should definitely get the fusion drive as one of the upgrades though .
__________________
2013 13" MacBook Air i5/8GB/256GB || White 64GB iPhone 5 || 32GB Cellular Silver iPad rMini!
Follow me on Twitter!
tann is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 29, 2012, 01:39 PM   #28
pukingpixels
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Sweden
I'd easily drop the 680MX. You don't need it for primarily 2D work in CS6.

However if you're playing a lot of games or if you're into 3D modeling the 680MX will make a big difference.
pukingpixels is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 29, 2012, 01:57 PM   #29
akatsuki
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by gagaliya View Post
680mx - must have, best $150 you can ever spend on the imac
Gaming?
akatsuki is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 29, 2012, 07:29 PM   #30
KaraH
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by thekev View Post
The 27" is officially upgradable in terms of ram. You don't have to pay someone else to do it if you want to save money.
I would already be paying them to install the SSD card. Assuming it is like the programs with previous imacs the memory install will cost the same (or almost the same) as buying it and shipping anyway.
__________________
through the years: Apple ][ eventually upgraded to a //e (and it never really died), Centris 660AV, PowerMac 7600, Macbook, iPod 5G, eMac, a couple of aluminium iMacs, STILL hoping for a 2013 MP
KaraH is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 29, 2012, 09:55 PM   #31
barefeats
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Borrow the $200 from your uncle.
barefeats is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 29, 2012, 11:32 PM   #32
Fried Chicken
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Wow there's some serious debate going on on this forum... Apple really priced everything very cleverly.
I would drop the i7. The reports of hyperthreading not bringing any significant advantage due to lack of support, and the $200 price difference for in so far as I can tell a not too significant speedboost make it not worth it.

Definitely keep the fusion drive unless there's a user upgradable option in the future. An SSD is the single biggest upgrade that can be done to a computer in terms of speed:$$$.

Then the graphics card, I would keep it for gaming and how software is increasingly relying on GPUs to acquire massive performance boosts.


So my breakdown is as follows:
(keep) fusion drive >> 2GB graphics >> i7 processor.
Fried Chicken is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > iMac

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BTO iMacs with Flash SSD option tanker5 iMac 10 Aug 19, 2013 10:58 AM
Why there's no 670mx BTO option for hi-end 21.5? kaellar iMac 14 Jan 21, 2013 02:21 AM
Would the i7 BTO option benefit for Unity3D fuzzywolf iMac 2 Jan 17, 2013 08:34 AM
Let's talk about BTO option pricing guesses grandvvazoo iMac 7 Nov 27, 2012 03:47 PM
Re: 768 GB SSD BTO option in Retina MacBook Pro. crooner MacBook Pro 10 Jun 12, 2012 10:53 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:05 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC