Never is the full population considered to be the smartphone buying market so I would consider what you've just said to be a truism.Yes but what percentage of the population would be considered smartphone buyers? It's not 1.3B
Well let me first refute your last point by pointing out that I have clearly and unequivocally not said that Apple failed in any way, I merely said that it is not as impressive as Apple are picturing it and have even congratulated them at the end of my post so please do not approach what I say in a dichotomous manner.As others have said... just going by the total population is silly.
There are many people in China who are living in poverty... how does that get factored into this?
And what about carriers? The US alone had 3 major carriers selling the iPhone 5.
China only had 2 carriers... and not even their biggest one.
What about 3G coverage? 3G? Yeah... some parts of China don't even have 3G... let alone 4G.
So... you cannot summarize this story by saying "Apple failed by only selling 2 million iPhones in a country of a billion people…"
And most of the Chinese population live in conditions like this:
So 2 million the first weekend is fine considering their addressable market.
And don't forget... this was just the first weekend. Apple will keep selling iPhones in China from now on.
China will be a good market for Apple.
Wow. It doesn't matter how well Apple does, haters are going to hate.
Get it straight people. Apple just sold two million more iPhone 5 units.
Who cares about the percentage of the population??? No matter how you slice it, two million is a lot of freaking phones!!
Wow. It doesn't matter how well Apple does, haters are going to hate.
Get it straight people. Apple just sold two million more iPhone 5 units.
Who cares about the percentage of the population??? No matter how you slice it, two million is a lot of freaking phones!!
If you can, buy stock. Now, now, NOW.
Yes actually, but w/ regards to segment and market. You can bet they're concerned w/ how many Accords v Camrys or Civics v Corollas they sell against Toyota.
But just the same, Apple is probably concerned only w/ phones competing in the same class, for example the S3, and in the same markets that the iPhone is offered in.
Never is the full population considered to be the smartphone buying market so I would consider what you've just said to be a truism.
Well let me first refute your last point by pointing out that I have clearly and unequivocally not said that Apple failed in any way, I merely said that it is not as impressive as Apple are picturing it and have even congratulated them at the end of my post so please do not approach what I say in a dichotomous manner.
Going back to your first point, I don't think it is silly to compare populations. It is indeed very difficult to compare smartphone markets and China indeed has a huge portion of its population which lives a life of poverty. At the same time, due to wealth distribution in the country, there is a lot of upper-middle and upper class people in the country and consequently one could argue that the smartphone buying market is comparable or even bigger than in the 9 aforementioned "initial" countries.
The choice of carriers is irrelevant and moreover you seem to assume that the iPhone 5 was available at a larger number of carriers and/or at the biggest ones in the 9 countries, which is not true (take UK for an example).
Finally your 3G argument, which is also completely irrelevant. To most people 4G support isn't a reason to buy an iPhone 5 - I happen to work in the advertising business and I must say, the biggest problem when it comes to promoting 4G is explaining its advantages to John Doe, without simply stating that it's faster. I would argue that most of iPhone 5 buyers don't even understand what 4G is - it's just a number to them, and 4 is better than 3, and that's it; it can't be considered a selling point. Moreover 4G isn't available in every country from the "initial 9" and each of those countries also has patchy 3G coverage.
If you could genuinely buy a Samsung Galaxy S3 for $49, then Apple would buy all the S3s in the world and make Samsung bankrupt in a heartbeat. Apple could then send all these S3s to China, where they are taken apart, and batteries, RAM and so on salvaged to be put into iPhones. Probably cheaper than buying the parts from the manufacturer.
What you actually did was enter a contract where you pay some amount of dollars every month for the next 12 or 18 or 24 months, and the difference between the cost of the S3 and your $49, plus some _very_ generous interest, is paid out of that monthly payment.
Could someone post for how much is iP5 being sold in China and the terms? Are they pretty much similar to US, 2 year commitment and about $200?
lol good for Apple then, own 10% of the market, and remain exclusive. Why not design something better and not just thinner, and don't overprice it ($842 in china) and capture a much bigger slice of the market. It just smells of greed and laziness! Thats not the Apple Steve built.
there is a Chinese proverb "钱多人傻速来", which means there's a place full of stupid rich man, hurry up.
So... Apple should flood the market with cheap crap just to get a bigger number on someone's market share graph?
Guess what... Apple doesn't care what everyone else is doing... they only wanna make great products. And that is EXACTLY what Steve Jobs wanted.
Samsung sold 18 mill S3's compared to Apples 16 million iPhones in the 3rd quarter, and their sales figures are climbing.
Samsung sold 18 mill S3's compared to Apples 16 million iPhones in the 3rd quarter, and their sales figures are climbing. My point was simply making news that Apple had sold x amount of iPhones in China isn't big news.
Maybe Apple doesn't care but I know Steve would have or he wouldn't have so much in his book!
Sales of the iPhone were 28% higher at 26 million;
People also don't realize the difference in purchasing power in China vs. the US. A person making $36,500/yr in China has the same purchasing power as a US household making roughly $100,000/yr.
My point being as I stated soo many times is, if all people want Apple to do is make money then fine, obviously I want them to make money but more importantly I'd like them to not loose ground in market share to a copycat company like Samsung, especially in China! I gave the Q3 figures to show the S3 sales over the iPhone and Samsung's year on year growth and dominance.Is there some kind of contest I'm unaware of? What do you get for 2nd place?
Apple is the only company that can make billions of dollars as the runner-up.
Speaking of that... Apple makes more money but sells fewer phones than Samsung. Seems like Apple figured out the secret... more results from less work.
Oh... and you might wanna check your figures... Apple sold 26.9 million iPhones last quarter.
http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2012/10/25Apple-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-Results.html
huh?? Apple sold 16M iphone in 3Q? This is from the earning announcement for 3Q12... China sale is a big deal because it will be the second biggest market for any cell phone maker in the world in a year or two..
http://www.foxbusiness.com/technolo...al-3q-profits-miss-wall-streets-expectations/
My point being as I stated soo many times is, if all people want Apple to do is make money then fine, obviously I want them to make money but more importantly I'd like them to not loose ground in market share to a copycat company like Samsung, especially in China! I gave the Q3 figures to show the S3 sales over the iPhone and Samsung's year on year growth and dominance.
If you think it's fine for Apple to sit back and invent less then fine, China is the worlds biggest market and also a place where Apple has yet no real brand loyalty, so they are giving the lead in smartphone sales to Samsung but being overpriced and safe.
I'd like them to not loose ground in market share to a copycat company like Samsung, especially in China!
the majority does not pay income tax or capital gain tax, there is no real estate tax either.
Under such condition, a mere restaurant worker can easily afford these gadgets.
I smell trolling. Oh wait posting bad things about Apple is not considered trolling on macrumors, only defending Apple is. My apology.