|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which is your favorite word processor for Mac OS? | |||
| Microsoft Office Word |
|
114 | 42.22% |
| Apple Pages |
|
112 | 41.48% |
| Nisus Writer Express |
|
1 | 0.37% |
| Nisus Writer Pro |
|
3 | 1.11% |
| Mellel |
|
3 | 1.11% |
| Mariner Writer |
|
1 | 0.37% |
| OpenOffice.org Writer |
|
5 | 1.85% |
| LibreOffice Writer |
|
8 | 2.96% |
| Scrivener |
|
20 | 7.41% |
| Bean |
|
3 | 1.11% |
| Voters: 270. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#101 | |
|
Quote:
Well, not really. Have you tried to use Hebrew in an English Word document? Doesn’t work. If you use Hebrew with English and other languages, Word is not superior. Mellel is top quality for this kind of writing and Nisus Writer Pro does well.
__________________
iMac 2011 21.5” MBP 15" matte (since 1990)old, slow, and confused but at least I'm inconsistent! ![]() The missing missing and challenges of a loved one missing |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#102 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Sign the petition! http://wh.gov/h5TJ |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#103 | |
|
Quote:
I use Word (2011) every day and have no complaints, so this isn't anti-Word in any way. What I think you're missing, jozeppy26, is the part of the whole picture that's expressed by "get the right tool for the job." We've recently had a thread here on Scrivener and its use for a thesis (comparing it to LaTex and Word, for example). If I want to write a short note or essay -- say 3-5 pages -- I never think about using anything but Word. It's perfect for that job. But if I'm working on something with many sections (large or small) and I know I'll be wanting to move them around and do various re-orderings to get to the organization I need, I never think about using Word. It's poorly-suited to that task. Scrivener is ideally suited to that task. I don't fear cutting and pasting (I cut my teeth on the DEC editor EDT, command-line only) but why use that technique (or Insert File, for that matter) when there are far better options for that task. Note the last three words: "for that task." Scrivener is well-suited to that task, especially because when the task is done, Scrivener can write out a Word document for sending around. At that point, the rest of the work can be done in Word. Bottom line, for me, is that I choose the tool best-suited to what I'm doing. Sometimes it's Word. Sometimes it's Scrivener. Sometimes it's inDesign, and once I laid out a book, for publication, in Open Office. Sometimes I use Bean. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#104 | |
|
Quote:
I don’t think you do get my point. 1. I serve as an editor for our church body magazine. I have several choices, but Scrivener beats them all. I have tried them all (and I have been writing on a computer for 23 years and by long hand for 50+ years). I receive files in all different kinds of formats. Yes, I try to educate writers, but... With Scrivener, I drag and drop them into Scrivener, and then can begin editing as they are all the same at that point. Try that with Word. 2. I also serve as President and Professor of our seminary. If I write anything with Hebrew, Greek, Latin, etc. which is often, Mellel is the only choice. Forget Word on that topic. For grading papers, I use whatever word processor the student uses (MS Word, OpenOffice/LibreOffice, Nisus Writer Pro, Mellel, InDesign). I bought MS Word two months ago (never had a need to go beyond MS Office 2004) because I had some issues working with OpenOffice on specific texts. But I had gotten by without Word for five years. So I use whatever helps me achieve the best results. 3. And I serve as pastor of a congregation. For bulletins and Bible studies I use Pages, InDesign, or Mellel, depending on what is needed. So, to say that I am not looking at the whole picture shows a lack of understanding what I do and how I do it. MS Word is very capable, but it doesn’t fit into my mix for what I need. I appreciate what Word can do. But personally I think that Word 2007/2010 and 2008/2011 were steps backward and counter productive to efficient word processing. But that is only my experience. I won’t use that to state what anyone else should or can use.
__________________
iMac 2011 21.5” MBP 15" matte (since 1990)old, slow, and confused but at least I'm inconsistent! ![]() The missing missing and challenges of a loved one missing |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#105 |
|
MS Word: awesome grammar and spell checker, also can play nice to PCs
Apple Page: very mac and good with pages for iOS end of story... you decide now. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#106 | ||
|
No! And it is an expensive piece of software... it gets even more expensive if I choose to buy every update, which is released yearly...
---------- Quote:
---------- Quote:
By the way, which would be the other four word processors in your Top 5?
__________________
15-inch Retina MacBook Pro 2.4 GHz (early 2013) | 13-inch MacBook 2.4 GHz (early 2008) | 32 GB new iPad wi-fi + cellular | 16 GB iPhone 5 |
|||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#107 | |
|
Quote:
Battery life is two hours worse (than OSX) and the trackpad is not as smooth. Also, I have to get used to the shortcut keys. I want to type ctrl+c, but I always press the fn key instead. I haven't tried Parallels 8 with Windows 8, but I used Parallels 6 with Windows 7. It's not as fast as on Bootcamp, it's "too integrated" on OSX, and Parallels 8 has ads (see: Parallels Forums). The battery life is as bad as on Bootcamp. But you don't have to worry about drivers and can use the same shortcut keys. So, I still don't know which one is better to work with Office 2013.
__________________
MBA 11.6 1.4Ghz 4Gb 64Gb iPhone 5 16Gb iPad 2 Wi-fi 16Gb
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#108 |
|
Here it goes another vote to LaTeX (which is not in the list). In my opinion it's great if you want a high quality output. It takes less than four days to learn how to do the most part. And once you are in, you never leave it. I don't agree with those who say that they only use LaTeX if the document is longer, I don't see any reason not to use it even for one page documents. Of course, it's in longer documents where it becomes true useful, but the quality of the output is quite high so I use it for every document.
I think that this processor should be in the list. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#109 |
|
Free
I use the free ones, why pay $$300
__________________
Mid-2010 Mac Mini.. ML 10.8.3 Core 2 Duo 2.66 GHz..4 GB..1TB HD NO windows on my MAC!!!! |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#110 |
|
If you require high quality, and the only app which produces output with that high quality costs $300 (and you think it's worth it, considering ease of use, for example), then you should pay it. If not, then you can live with free ones.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#111 |
|
my Openoffice prints just fine..
__________________
Mid-2010 Mac Mini.. ML 10.8.3 Core 2 Duo 2.66 GHz..4 GB..1TB HD NO windows on my MAC!!!! |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#112 |
|
@oldhifi That's up to you. I wasn't saying that expensive programs output better documents (in fact, as I said before, I use LaTeX, which is free), just saying that some people need (or think they need) to pay so they get what they want, because it's not offered for free (again, not my case).
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#113 | |
|
Quote:
But other factors may play a part on it. OpenOffice.org Writer is not a bad piece of software; in fact, it turned out to be a good word processor. But Microsoft Word is better, faster, more convenient, more ergonomic and has more features than OpenOffice.org Writer. The superiority of Word over the open source alternative is obvious and simply undeniable. If you think it is worth the price Microsoft charges, then it is fine. If you think OpenOffice.org Writer suits your needs and you do not want to pay a premium, it is fine either.
__________________
15-inch Retina MacBook Pro 2.4 GHz (early 2013) | 13-inch MacBook 2.4 GHz (early 2008) | 32 GB new iPad wi-fi + cellular | 16 GB iPhone 5 |
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#114 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#115 |
|
Thanks! Well, by the way, Word has just passed Pages on this poll...
__________________
15-inch Retina MacBook Pro 2.4 GHz (early 2013) | 13-inch MacBook 2.4 GHz (early 2008) | 32 GB new iPad wi-fi + cellular | 16 GB iPhone 5 |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#116 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Macademise your research. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#117 |
|
Pages, it does everything you will need it to do.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#118 |
|
Well, I need to do cross-references. How does Pages do cross-references?
__________________
15-inch Retina MacBook Pro 2.4 GHz (early 2013) | 13-inch MacBook 2.4 GHz (early 2008) | 32 GB new iPad wi-fi + cellular | 16 GB iPhone 5 |
|
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47 PM.





(since 1990)


Linear Mode
