HFS+ is light years behind what a proper filesystem should be. OS X security lags behind Windows by years, never mind *nix.
HFS+ is light years ahead of NTFS (The well... "Not Totally Fragmented System" unlike Fat32 which is super fragmented very quickly) so if it's light years behind what it 'should' be, then Windows is only that much worse. XFS would be nice, though, but imperceptible to an average Mac user either way.
There are three kinds of people. The smart folks use *nix.
The business folks and sane people use Windows. Then there are idiots who can't think for themselves and need something that doesn't require a positive IQ value to use... so they use OS X.
Your post pretty much TROLLS at this point by insulting every single Mac user on this forum with the idiot comment, but I find it particularly ironic given that OSX IS certified UNIX and not just *nix (i.e. aka not 'really' unix but we wish we could use the term but cannot without getting sued so we'll put an asterix in front of it rather than pay for the valid license). The idea of "sane" people using Windows with its "more security" is regularly targeted by every hacker, thief and scammer on the planet. You absolutely MUST use anti-malware with Windows which will consume CPU cycles (booting becomes particularly slow on automatic update mode with something like AVG but annoys you to death if you manually update) or your time (manual) or both (hey, your system contains a key logger and you better check your bank records since you did online banking the other day and the thief now has your logon). Yeah, that's totally 'sane'.
Again, we have the UNIX comparison. You say the "smart" people use *NIX, yet OSX is UNIX and perhaps that is why it hasn't needed all the claptrap security bolt-ons and Windows Updates that Windows is so infamous for. Frankly, one could make a valid point about Apple hardware costing too much, but one could always make a Hackintosh. They could also argue that Windows is better for gaming, but then one could argue that consoles are better suited for that purpose these days anyway (besides any Mac can boot into Windows these days for such a purpose or even run it in virtualization and Linux is nearly as easy to install as well.
Thus, the "troll argument" (which pretty much equals name calling and nothing else to support the 'argument') is shown to be so much bullcrap garbage. But then what can what expect from a troll other than BS? And if he's not a troll then he's about as ignorant as they come in terms of computer knowledge.