|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
|
Ok, here's what I wanna do. I want a computer that can surf the Internet, use e-mail, play DVD-movies, listen to music, use a wireless network on (between a Mac and a PC), use a word processor, use a digital camera with a printer and photo editing software (which I can get later), be able to easily transport it in a case, and play games, all without any trouble. Would the following system work for me FOR YEARS TO COME or should I wait for the G5 ? i.e. I'm not buying the PowerMac or PowerBook since they're beyond my budget.
NOTICE: Some of the items in the list below I plan to purchase separately from the system, since I don't want to make payments on these items. ![]() What do you think?
Last edited by Shrek : Aug 23, 2002 at 05:27 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jul 2002
|
Heh??? I thought that it already shipped with appleworks installed!
Mine did...
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned
|
Yea
You will be fine. I do all that with a G4 400MHz Sawtooth and a Radeon Mac Edition
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
macrumors 68020
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Austin, TX
|
Personally, I would go with the 10 gb iPod
![]() Really, if you think about it, if you wanted the remote and carrying case for the 5 gb iPod, you'd spend 70 bucks more, so it's like getting a better iPod with 5 more gigs for only 30 bucks ![]() The system seems nice. I sure wish I had something like that, but my iBook works just fine...
__________________
Hook 'em Horns! |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: NJ
|
it will work
that system should do fine for what you want to do. however you save some money by not buying AppleWorks since it is included in the system and by not maxing out the RAM with Apple's RAM, it's really expensive. Just get the lowest amount of RAM possible from Apple, then buy some from Crucial or somwhere else and you can save some money. Then you would have the extra money to buy the 10 GB iPod.
__________________
MacBook Pro, LED Cinema Display, iPhone 3G S⃣ 32 GB, iPod 40 GB, iPod shuffle |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Thread Starter
Banned
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hong Kong
|
man.. i wish i had the money for that..
have fun! |
|
|
| firewire2001 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by firewire2001 |
|
|
#8 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Jul 2002
|
You also have an Airport Card listed in the specs on the system and then one listed separately further down.
The most I would do for the memory would be to get it with one 512MB module, that way you don't have to void your warranty to get 1GB and you save a couple hundred by buying the second 512MB module somewhere else. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Thread Starter
Banned
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: All up in your bidness
|
You'll be able to do all the things you mentioned on that iMac for years to come. However, in a few years, that iMac is going to seem like a total dog, unless you are or plan on becoming a Mac zealot, in which case it will be wicked fast forever.
Also, you don't need the AirPort hub if you've only got two computers. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Jul 2002
|
That's what I get for reading.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: back in NYC!
|
I used the 800 mhz iMac at compUSA and it was really snappy. It worked great, and im sure you would enjoy it now. It is pretty hard to predict whether it would satisfy you in the next couple of years.
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
macrumors 601
|
I would get the new eMac that's coming soon with the superdrive. I say this because you mention transporting it. It is heavier then the iMac but it is a single unit without a big lcd on the end of an arm that all could easily be damaged. The eMac on the other hand will have similar performance but will provide you with an all in one unit, "which I don't really consider the iMac," that you can easily put in a bag or box or case. The emac will do everything that you mentioned you wanted with all the specs of the iMac 512mb etc. plus it's only 1708.00 including the swivel stand.
Just my 2 cents. ![]() By the way that order you posted must be dated because the price for the iMac with the specs you list is now only $2149.00. I seem to remember that they droped the price on it $100 recently.
__________________
Folding@Home "Folding FAQ," for more information. Fold with your PS3. Message me on the Playstation Network ID 'MacBandit' Last edited by MacBandit : Aug 24, 2002 at 09:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jul 2002
|
Quote:
Last edited by MacMaster : Aug 24, 2002 at 09:22 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
macrumors 601
|
Quote:
By the way I have hefted the eMac and I find it very easy to carry yes it's a little heavy but the shape makes it easy with the heavy glass of the screen resting against your body.
__________________
Folding@Home "Folding FAQ," for more information. Fold with your PS3. Message me on the Playstation Network ID 'MacBandit' |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
no, i think u're wrong there bandit. the eMac is very much as heavy as it looks. i work at a mac store and picking them up, turning them over and setting them back down each and every day doesnt make things any easier for me. i lift the imac all the time, and i suggest holding it by the arm with one hand and the bottom the imac with the other. the emac in the other hand has no real handle and u are forced to bearhug the computer for transporting. with all macs though, you have to treat them with care and love, so its possible to keep either one in good condition, just take the necessary precautions. but i still believe the imac will give u the better overall experience without a hernia.
__________________
"I put the 'social' in anti-social". |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
macrumors 601
|
Quote:
Bear hugging something of this value is the only way to do it and that is what I described in my post by having the screen against your body. If you think 50lbs is heavy you need to get in shape. Saying 50lbs is to heavy is like saying a very small child is too heavy to pick up. My point is not the total ease of portability but the resistance to damage. Yes you can scratch or damage the eMac but the screen isn't going to get damaged very easily unless you drop it wich would be fatal to the iMac also. My point here is on how delicate an LCD screen is most people don't think of this because they are use to CRT screens which you can clean with almost anything without scratching it where on the other hand you need to be very careful in the care of an LCD. I don't really want to start a fight over this it's just that maybe I should just say that I don't think the iMac should be considered portable by any standards and you're saying the same about the eMac so maybe he should by an iBook or an older Powerbook if he wants portability and get an external superdrive. Then the screen would be protected.
__________________
Folding@Home "Folding FAQ," for more information. Fold with your PS3. Message me on the Playstation Network ID 'MacBandit' |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
macrumors 601
|
Quote:
Bear hugging something of this value is the only way to do it and that is what I described in my post by having the screen against your body. If you think 50lbs is heavy you need to get in shape. Saying 50lbs is to heavy is like saying a very small child is too heavy to pick up. My point is not the total ease of portability but the resistance to damage. Yes you can scratch or damage the eMac but the screen isn't going to get damaged very easily unless you drop it wich would be fatal to the iMac also. My point here is on how delicate an LCD screen is most people don't think of this because they are use to CRT screens which you can clean with almost anything without scratching it where on the other hand you need to be very careful in the care of an LCD. I don't really want to start a fight over this it's just that maybe I should just say that I don't think the iMac should be considered portable by any standards and you're saying the same about the eMac so maybe he should by an iBook or an older Powerbook if he wants portability and get an external superdrive. Then the screen would be protected.
__________________
Folding@Home "Folding FAQ," for more information. Fold with your PS3. Message me on the Playstation Network ID 'MacBandit' |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Thread Starter
Banned
|
I've seen a nice carrying case for the iMac on some website that keeps it protected and all. Can't remember where, though. I'll go and look for it. . . brb.
![]() edit: here it is!
Last edited by Shrek : Aug 24, 2002 at 11:06 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: chicago
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Thread Starter
Banned
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
macrumors 601
|
I still recommend a laptop though the case for the iMac looks good and protects the screen well.
The final decission of course is up to you and your limitations by budget. Good luck and have fun with which ever one you get. Being a Mac it would be hard to be disatisfied with any of them.
__________________
Folding@Home "Folding FAQ," for more information. Fold with your PS3. Message me on the Playstation Network ID 'MacBandit' |
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: chicago
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jul 2002
|
Get the iMac and the carrying case for that...You don't want to lug that 50lbs. eMac around once a week! Or on vacation for that matter!
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
macrumors 601
|
Quote:
__________________
Folding@Home "Folding FAQ," for more information. Fold with your PS3. Message me on the Playstation Network ID 'MacBandit' |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|