Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > Product Recommendations/Reviews

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Dec 13, 2004, 12:20 PM   #1
Dave00
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Scanner for Photo Archival purposes

Hi all,

I need to scan some photo prints in for archiving, and I'm not real satisfied with my current scanner (Canon) which I've used the past couple years. It seems to have problems picking up subtle color gradients, so the pictures wind up looking overly contrasted. In talking to others, this seems to be an extremely common problem. Anyone know of a solution?

Thanks!
--D
Dave00 is offline   0
Old Dec 13, 2004, 12:37 PM   #2
vjfoxy
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Vienna, Austria
In a similar position - in that I'm looking for a scanner to digitise my wives film slide collection (approx 2000 slides). At first I was looking for film specific scanners (for film negative and slides). I've now heard Canon have dropped this dedicated line and replaced it with scanners such as the i9950 (thats the Euro name).

I find the http://www.photo-i.co.uk/ site provides some useful tips.

Good luck.
__________________
Switched: Jan 2002
iMac G5 1.8GHz 20", 1GB, 250GB HD, SD, Airport Extreme, BT
Airport Express (2)
iPod photo 60GB
iBook G3 600MHz 384RAM, iPod 1G
vjfoxy is offline   0
Old Dec 13, 2004, 01:14 PM   #3
Mr. Anderson
Moderator emeritus
 
Mr. Anderson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: VA
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Anderson
Odd, I just was thinking about this the other day as well. I'm in the market for a slide scanner - I've used the Nikon's before and I'm tempted to go buy one myself - the prices have come down a bit.

But are there any good sites that have decent comprehensive reviews of all the slide scanners?

D
__________________
"Klaatu varada nikto!"
Mr. Anderson is offline   0
Old Dec 20, 2004, 06:59 AM   #4
el greenerino
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Send a message via AIM to el greenerino
You could probably take what you need scanned to a service bereau, they'd probably do a better job than anything the average home user would. Just make sure they're reputable and use equipment that's better han what they use at walgreens
__________________
i love alpacas
el greenerino is offline   0
Old Dec 20, 2004, 10:25 AM   #5
Dave00
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
of course, taking them in to a photo shop is always an option, but for alot of photos, it becomes more cost-effective to buy your own scanner. Was just wondering which was considered to have especially good color fidelity.

dave
Dave00 is offline   0
Old Dec 20, 2004, 11:37 AM   #6
aricher
macrumors 68020
 
aricher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chi-il
A service bureau is way to expensive in the long run. I have over 25,000 slides of my Grandfather's to scan for a gallery show/book next year. Getting them pro-scanned would break the bank. I think I'll be buying a couple of dedicated slide scanners. I'm leaning towards Nikon's scanners - that digitalICE software is great.
aricher is offline   0
Old Dec 20, 2004, 03:45 PM   #7
el greenerino
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Send a message via AIM to el greenerino
Well if you get a negative and slide scanner and decide ou don't need it anymore, drop me a PM
__________________
i love alpacas
el greenerino is offline   0
Old Dec 20, 2004, 06:14 PM   #8
CalfCanuck
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Nikons scanners are nice

The Nikon line, with digital ICE (as mentioned above) are a very capable line. I have the earlier Coolscan 4000, with the optional (but critical) scan feeder. It costs more, but when scanning thousands of images it was well worth it.

I believe the new Coolscan 5000 line is both improved and cheaper, so I'd look into that if you have a large quantity of images to scan.

My feeder (I believe they've modified the current feeder) needed a few modifications (searchable via google) to work with thinner cardboard mounts, but once done it worked fairly well. Plastic mounts were never a problem. Of course one had the odd jam, and all images still needed the normal digital darkroom work in Photoshop. But that's standard for every image.

Edit - Just saw your "25,000 images to scan". Be sure to get scanning ASAP - I find that my limit is about 100 per day, allowing time for each image in photoshop.

If I was you, i'd be more selective and only scan the images you were at least considering printing

Last edited by CalfCanuck; Dec 20, 2004 at 06:22 PM.
CalfCanuck is offline   0
Old Dec 20, 2004, 06:41 PM   #9
CalfCanuck
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Current Nikon 5000 review

Someone was asking about scanner reviews - not too much that's current out there. Many reviews date from the late 90's!! I guess the push to digital cameras killed most of the market.

http://www.bythom.com/coolscanv.htm

I should note that the 4000ED is my third generation dedicated 35mm scanner. I bought a first generation Nikon personal scanner back in 1993. Hard to get a good scan, as it's dynamic range was pretty bad. My second generation was a Polaroid Sprintscan from 1998. Much better, but single feed and still spotty with complicated slides. I bought the Nikon 4000 in 2003 and have been VERY happy with its performance.
CalfCanuck is offline   0
Old Dec 20, 2004, 06:58 PM   #10
Peyote
macrumors 6502a
 
Peyote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Dynamic Range was one thing I was about to mention. I don't know a lot about 35MM only scanners, but I know that when I'm looking for a flatbed scanner, I won't buy anything with a DMax under 3.4. Even 3.4 is pushing it IMHO, and really 3.8 is where it's at.

That is an often overlooked specification. It basically tells you how wide of a range of contrast it can scan. The higher the better.

Last edited by Peyote; Dec 20, 2004 at 07:00 PM.
Peyote is offline   0


 
MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > Product Recommendations/Reviews

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SSD editing w/HD archival file management w/Aperture rhp2424 Digital Photography 3 Dec 24, 2013 09:56 AM
Time Capsule archival? ScottishCaptain Mac Peripherals 5 Aug 1, 2013 03:05 PM
Using Facetime as VoIP for Broadasting purposes Knightwchmn Mac Basics and Help 0 Jun 19, 2013 11:30 AM
New scanner or old SCSI scanner on Mac Pro? macmesser Mac Pro 14 Feb 22, 2013 03:59 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:22 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC