Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,556
30,884



152110-skyfire_icon_125.jpg


Last week, we reported on the launch of Skyfire Web Browser, a new browser for iOS that enables viewing of Flash video content. The app, priced at $2.99, was quickly yanked from the App Store due to its popularity overwhelming Skyfire's servers used to convert Flash content to HTML5 format, but has since returned in limited "batches" as capacity allows.

MobileCrunch notes that Skyfire pulled in gross receipts of nearly $1 million from the App Store over the app's launch weekend.
The company isn't sharing exact numbers, but they did just tell me that their download numbers for their first weekend on the store were well over 300,000. At $2.99 a pop, that works out to one hell of a bounty. SkyFire isn't walking away with that whole million, of course; Apple's going to get their 30% cut, which brings SkyFire’s share down to somewhere between $600-700,000.
The company has already revealed that it is working on an iPad-native version of Skyfire Web Browser, which will apparently not be released as a universal version of the existing app, as the company recommends that those who use the iPad as their primary iOS browser hold off from purchasing until the release of the iPad version.

Article Link: Skyfire Rakes in Nearly $1 Million in First Weekend
 

Corbin052198

macrumors 6502
Mar 13, 2010
285
0
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 3_1_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile/7E18 Safari/528.16)

Awsome! Just wait until the iPad version comes out. I'm sure their servers will shut down for a couple weeks after the launch, though.
 

vvebsta

macrumors 6502a
Sep 27, 2006
505
0
just goes to show people still want to be able to see flash on their iphones reguardless of how bloated
 

parapup

macrumors 65816
Oct 31, 2006
1,291
49
I wonder what battery life will be like.

Also, how many people downloaded it just so they could watch porn?

No smart person will watch porn with a browser which does server side decoding of the videos ;)
 

paradox00

macrumors 65816
Sep 29, 2009
1,411
827
just goes to show people still want to be able to see flash on their iphones reguardless of how bloated

I got it just to test it out, and I suspect many others did the same.

Processing Flash on a server means the bloat isn't on the phone, so this doesn't actually mean people want flash at any cost. That said, click to flash would be nice, but we'll never see it.
 

rmwebs

macrumors 68040
Apr 6, 2007
3,140
0
This is all well and good but what happens when the cash dries up? The servers go down, leaving you with an expensive Safari.

Anything that you pay for one-time that is reliant on a 3rd party funding its operation is bad news :/
 

Don Kosak

macrumors 6502a
Mar 12, 2010
860
4
Hilo, Hawaii
What's with all the developers that won't do Universal Apps?

If you're supporting both platforms anyway, it's actually far less code, and less testing to just do a Universal App. (I know, I've done two of them so far.)
 

batchtaster

macrumors 65816
Mar 3, 2008
1,031
217
just goes to show people still want to be able to see flash on their iphones reguardless of how bloated

Nonsense. It means nothing of the sort. Check back in 6 months, 3 months or even 1 month and see a) how many ppl are still using it, and b) how many ppl are buying it once the first blush of excitement is over.

Opera's browser went nuts when it was released. It was the Bellepheron to the Chimera of Apple's Safari lock-in. Now where is it? It doesn't even appear on the Top 200 Free list.
 
Last edited:

crisss1205

macrumors 6502a
Oct 7, 2008
931
267
NYC
What's with all the developers that won't do Universal Apps?

If you're supporting both platforms anyway, it's actually far less code, and less testing to just do a Universal App. (I know, I've done two of them so far.)

So I can charge more money for 2 platforms! Thats why (I think) the SlingPlayer app will not be universal. If you want to get the iPhone and iPad app it will be $60 instead of $30
 

Whorehay

macrumors 6502a
Feb 17, 2008
631
1
So I can charge more money for 2 platforms! Thats why (I think) the SlingPlayer app will not be universal. If you want to get the iPhone and iPad app it will be $60 instead of $30

And that's exactly why I will buy neither!
 

Xian Zhu Xuande

macrumors 6502a
Jul 30, 2008
941
128
So sincere curiosity here: I've read the reviews and it seems like this browser can't do all the Flash-related stuff a personal would normally want to do, ranging from some popular video sites like Hulu to Flash games. I'm not missing Flash on my iPhone or iPad one bit, but I'm also a little curious at this browser's success. Is it mostly people downloading something because they feel like they're getting a thing they were told they couldn't get? Or does this product actually offer something excellent?
 

atticus18244fsa

macrumors 6502
Jul 11, 2008
279
0
Waterloo, ON
Didn't they state in that one video that was posted on the homepage that they spent something like $25 million on R&D for this app? They're 1/25 of the way there:D
 

ipodtouch-user

macrumors member
Sep 9, 2009
49
0
Flash much?!

Hey Apple - ya think your user base might be interested in Flash??

Lol.

Yeah, you know what's best for us users though - so we should be elated that you are resisting support for it tooth and nail.
 

tranceme

macrumors 6502
Jan 10, 2006
250
201
California, US
But does it work?

The reviews have been bad. My buddies at work can't get most sites to work. So, does this mean refunds? Or have people been getting this to work? Just curious.
 

vvebsta

macrumors 6502a
Sep 27, 2006
505
0
Nonsense. It means nothing of the sort. Check back in 6 months, 3 months or even 1 month and see a) how many ppl are still using it, and b) how many ppl are buying it once the first blush of excitement is over.

Opera's browser went nuts when it was released. It was the Bellepheron to the Chimera of Apple's Safari lock-in. Now where is it? It doesn't even appear on the Top 200 Free list.

Ok I'll rephrase. People want their CONTENT regardless if its playing on bloatware or the latest trend. Allot of content just happens to be encoded in flash.
 

globalist

macrumors 6502a
Aug 19, 2009
748
264
So sincere curiosity here: I've read the reviews and it seems like this browser can't do all the Flash-related stuff a personal would normally want to do, ranging from some popular video sites like Hulu to Flash games. I'm not missing Flash on my iPhone or iPad one bit, but I'm also a little curious at this browser's success. Is it mostly people downloading something because they feel like they're getting a thing they were told they couldn't get? Or does this product actually offer something excellent?

You're absolutely spot on here. Nothing excellent, just a short-term sense of victory over a perceived hurdle for lots of folks. I persinally have no use whatsoever for Flash on my iphone so I did not buy this app.
 

Seo

macrumors regular
Jun 1, 2009
125
0
Cupertino, California
just goes to show people still want to be able to see flash on their iphones reguardless of how bloated

Not an accurate deduction from this app's popularity.

See, this app is a very slick implementation of Flash on the iOS. No bloat, and everything's fast and battery efficient, because iOS sees it as HTML5. All the bloat and processing is on the Skyfire servers.

All you can tell from Skyfire's success is that people want Flash as long as it is as good or better than HTML5.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.