Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

rekhyt

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jun 20, 2008
1,127
78
Part of the old MR guard.
Apple seems to be going pretty aggressively on the hardware front nowadays since the establishment of their unibody design of the MacBook Pro in 2008 (Not sure about the year, but I think I got it correct.)

(I'm referring Macbook Pro to the 15" and 17" editions and not the 13" counterpart.)

Since then:
  • 2008: Breakthrough Unibody design with upgraded Core 2 Duo processors compared to previous generations, 2 graphics card capability
  • 2009 Spec Bump(?): Better specs. Advertised as better specs than the previous generator.
  • 2010: i5 and i7 series introduced for the MacBook Pro. nVidia 3M series introduced. Graphics card is 2 times better than before, according to GPU Benchmark.
  • 2011: ?

Correct me if I have any facts wrong. Haven't been really interested in the hardware side of Apple laptops until recently.

Do you think Apple will up the game again by introducing the new GeForce 4 M series or the ATI 6 Mobility series for the MacBook Pros (Mid/High), along with the other possible new technology introduced then? (Lightpeak, etc.)
 

Erasmus

macrumors 68030
Jun 22, 2006
2,756
298
Australia
Which hemisphere do you live in? ie. when you say Summer MBPs, do you mean Jan-Feb, or Jul-Aug?

Other than that, I really don't want to speculate. I know what I WANT, and think what I WANT is easily do-able (basically HP Envy 15" with some Apple magic) but expect to be disappointed.

FWIW, I'm hoping for AMD 6 series, optimally the 5830 replacement. Expecting a 330M.
 

Erasmus

macrumors 68030
Jun 22, 2006
2,756
298
Australia
By summer if nVidia doesn't have Mobile 500 series out, they're doing something very wrong. GTX 580 was recently released with (from what I understand) more 500 series following it.

Can we make a universal agreement to stop using seasons? Winter starts next month for me. Summer is 7 months away. I still don't know if we're talking about the Jan-Feb MBP refresh, or the Jul-Aug MBP refresh!

Might I suggest "Early 2011" and "Late 2011" as universally consistent replacements.
 

weenerdog

macrumors member
Dec 4, 2007
88
0
Can we make a universal agreement to stop using seasons? Winter starts next month for me. Summer is 7 months away. I still don't know if we're talking about the Jan-Feb MBP refresh, or the Jul-Aug MBP refresh!

Might I suggest "Early 2011" and "Late 2011" as universally consistent replacements.

I concur!!
 

cmzwirner

macrumors newbie
Nov 16, 2010
14
0
I have a really bad feeling about the next generation MBP's.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/3876/intels-core-2011-mobile-roadmap-revealed-sandy-bridge-part-ii

If you read this article, it gives you a preview on the cores to come. The lowest clock for this socket sized is a 2.5ghz with a TDP of 35. That is only about 10 TDP higher than the core2duo. While that CPU clock may be great, With this comes integrated graphics that supposedly outperforms todays integrated graphics by a long shot. So i seriously doubt that the new 13" MBP's are going to come with a high end discrete graphics solution.

For the higher end MBP's, i feel like we will be seeing AT MOST a 435m. I really dont know the ATI equivalent.. But i feel like we are going to get screwed over.

Personally.. Id really like to see the superdrive removed, and id like to see a nice discrete GPU, and a bigger battery put in there. They can easily make the macbook pro a true pro model. For people who need an optical drive, and dont know what a graphics card is, there is the macbook. Put the freaking macbook into an aluminum unibody. Thats all most pro owners care about anyways.
 

aimbdd

macrumors 6502a
Dec 10, 2008
625
63
East Cost
I have a really bad feeling about the next generation MBP's.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/3876/intels-core-2011-mobile-roadmap-revealed-sandy-bridge-part-ii

If you read this article, it gives you a preview on the cores to come. The lowest clock for this socket sized is a 2.5ghz with a TDP of 35. That is only about 10 TDP higher than the core2duo. While that CPU clock may be great, With this comes integrated graphics that supposedly outperforms todays integrated graphics by a long shot. So i seriously doubt that the new 13" MBP's are going to come with a high end discrete graphics solution.

For the higher end MBP's, i feel like we will be seeing AT MOST a 435m. I really dont know the ATI equivalent.. But i feel like we are going to get screwed over.

Personally.. Id really like to see the superdrive removed, and id like to see a nice discrete GPU, and a bigger battery put in there. They can easily make the macbook pro a true pro model. For people who need an optical drive, and dont know what a graphics card is, there is the macbook. Put the freaking macbook into an aluminum unibody. Thats all most pro owners care about anyways.

I agree. I think they will put a semi decent gpu in there though. They have been making this push toward gaming, releasing software updates for it and everything.
 

Hellhammer

Moderator emeritus
Dec 10, 2008
22,164
582
Finland
Link & Specs?

There is no specs for the mobility cards, yet. See the pic for desktop specs

gtx-500-prediction.jpg
 

Erasmus

macrumors 68030
Jun 22, 2006
2,756
298
Australia
It's always so inspiring when a GPU manufacturer makes it impossible to find TDP information about their products...
 

mark28

macrumors 68000
Jan 29, 2010
1,632
2
By summer if nVidia doesn't have Mobile 500 series out, they're doing something very wrong. GTX 580 was recently released with (from what I understand) more 500 series following it.

The GTX 580 is more like a GTX 485/495, rather than a new chip.

ATI is 6000 series is very attractive for laptops as they are even more efficient than the 5000 series.
 

mark28

macrumors 68000
Jan 29, 2010
1,632
2
Apple seems to be going pretty aggressively on the hardware front nowadays since the establishment of their unibody design of the MacBook Pro in 2008 (Not sure about the year, but I think I got it correct.)

(I'm referring Macbook Pro to the 15" and 17" editions and not the 13" counterpart.)

Since then:
  • 2008: Breakthrough Unibody design with upgraded Core 2 Duo processors compared to previous generations, 2 graphics card capability
  • 2009 Spec Bump(?): Better specs. Advertised as better specs than the previous generator.
  • 2010: i5 and i7 series introduced for the MacBook Pro. nVidia 3M series introduced. Graphics card is 2 times better than before, according to GPU Benchmark.
  • 2011: ?

Correct me if I have any facts wrong. Haven't been really interested in the hardware side of Apple laptops until recently.

Do you think Apple will up the game again by introducing the new GeForce 4 M series or the ATI 6 Mobility series for the MacBook Pros (Mid/High), along with the other possible new technology introduced then? (Lightpeak, etc.)

Whatever GPU Apple will be using, it won't be a high end GPU. Probably a 425M like in the new Sony F.
 

dusk007

macrumors 68040
Dec 5, 2009
3,411
104
It is most likely a 420M or 425M or the 500M counter part. 500M series is no different it is almost a re branding.
Same applies to most of the HD 6000 series as it seems but still it would be a better choice for all those who want more performance for the heat generated.
The only thing really important imo is that there needs to be more VRAM by default. 1GB is standard everywhere and new game engines assume they can use as much. 256 and 512 is very not future proof and truly limits in the choice of details enabled. With specific setting it doesn't matter but with enough VRAM you can get the most out of GPU and Engine unlike now.
 

rekhyt

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jun 20, 2008
1,127
78
Part of the old MR guard.
Whatever GPU Apple will be using, it won't be a high end GPU. Probably a 425M like in the new Sony F.

One can hope that they might up the video RAM from the base 256 to 512MB to become the base, and 1GB for the high end cards.

It's surprising and ironic how iPhones are now considered to be the "best-of-the-best" phones in the market and that it has the best software and hardware (Retina screens, 2 cameras, aluminium finish, ...), and how Windows users/people against Apple used to say that Macs were a "premium product" and the hardware was a failure, while in the mobile world, it is the complete opposite.

I think Apple has been making a push to become a powerful laptop (That could be used for gaming, video creation, ..., as well as productivity uses.)

  • Introduction of dual graphic cards in 2008(?)
  • Hardware series matched other Windows laptops. (Transitioned to the Intel i series instead of staying with Core 2 Duo series.)
  • Collaboration with Valve to push Steam towards the Mac platform. (Ironically, Apple is creating the App Store on the Mac, which I assume also has a games section. Or perhaps Apple would integrate/link Steam into the games section.)

It is most likely a 420M or 425M or the 500M counter part. 500M series is no different it is almost a re branding.
Same applies to most of the HD 6000 series as it seems but still it would be a better choice for all those who want more performance for the heat generated.
The only thing really important imo is that there needs to be more VRAM by default. 1GB is standard everywhere and new game engines assume they can use as much. 256 and 512 is very not future proof and truly limits in the choice of details enabled. With specific setting it doesn't matter but with enough VRAM you can get the most out of GPU and Engine unlike now.

So would the ATI HD series generate more heat compared to the nVidia cards in return for better performance? ... I thought it was the entire opposite - I thought nVidia cards performed better than ATi's.

A possibility would be that they would remove the DVD drive so that they could allow for more heat-dispersing systems to allow for a better processor and a better graphics card.

The GTX 580 is more like a GTX 485/495, rather than a new chip.

ATI is 6000 series is very attractive for laptops as they are even more efficient than the 5000 series.

Ahh... ... Would it be likely for Apple to use the 6000 series then, if they were to use AMD as the provider of the graphics chipset?

I agree. I think they will put a semi decent gpu in there though. They have been making this push toward gaming, releasing software updates for it and everything.

Agreed.

I have a really bad feeling about the next generation MBP's.
 

Hellhammer

Moderator emeritus
Dec 10, 2008
22,164
582
Finland
Introduction of dual graphic cards in 2008(?)

Apple did that to increase the battery life. Also, that's what you get with nVidia chipsets since 9400M integrates both bridges in it (so it would anyway have 9400M in it even though you wouldn't able to use it as GPU). Other companies have done that as well

Hardware series matched other Windows laptops. (Transitioned to the Intel i series instead of staying with Core 2 Duo series.)

Where is the option for Clarksfield then? Apple provides decent specs but charges premium for that. You still have a lot less option with MBPs than you have with PCs. What Apple should do is update Macs when new CPUs and GPUs come, not right before new stuff comes.
 

rekhyt

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jun 20, 2008
1,127
78
Part of the old MR guard.
Apple did that to increase the battery life. Also, that's what you get with nVidia chipsets since 9400M integrates both bridges in it (so it would anyway have 9400M in it even though you wouldn't able to use it as GPU). Other companies have done that as well

Where is the option for Clarksfield then? Apple provides decent specs but charges premium for that. You still have a lot less option with MBPs than you have with PCs. What Apple should do is update Macs when new CPUs and GPUs come, not right before new stuff comes.

Much much better than keeping the Core 2 Duos. That would have been a serious embarrassment for Apple as well as reinforcing the "opposition"'s argument regarding the specs.

I think their timing is perfect if they plan to release LightPeak on the new MacBook Pros in June.

I do hope and agree with you that the better i7 processor should be more affordable in the future.
 

CaoCao

macrumors 6502a
Jul 27, 2010
783
2
Much much better than keeping the Core 2 Duos. That would have been a serious embarrassment for Apple as well as reinforcing the "opposition"'s argument regarding the specs.

I think their timing is perfect if they plan to release LightPeak on the new MacBook Pros in June.

I do hope and agree with you that the better i7 processor should be more affordable in the future.

Actually I'd expect LightPeak to come with Ivy Bridge unless an engineer has one Hell of an epiphany
 

rekhyt

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jun 20, 2008
1,127
78
Part of the old MR guard.
Actually I'd expect LightPeak to come with Ivy Bridge unless an engineer has one Hell of an epiphany

Ahh… … Never heard of Ivy Bridge before until now. According to the Wikipedia entry, it apparently has it's own graphics chipset within the CPU chip itself, if I interpret it correctly.

Is it likely for Ivy Bridge to come out during the possible June revision of the MacBook Pros, since it said that it might be "released as early as the second half of 2011"?

I'm planning to buy a new MacBook Pro and sell my current one, because the processor and graphics chipset is really limiting. Looking at the CPU roadmaps, it seems like Haswell is due to come out in 2012/2013.

Would it be worth waiting for Haswell?
 

cili0

macrumors member
Jan 19, 2010
83
0
Italy
Nobody is worried about the rumors posted on 9to5 according to which the next update will be not before April '11? if true the timeframe between updates would be stretched to a whole year.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.