Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > Product Recommendations/Reviews

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jan 19, 2005, 09:18 AM   #1
joey4127
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Send a message via AIM to joey4127
Is this LCD Mac compatible?

http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduc...001-171&depa=0

It needs to be compatible with mac mini. Will the one above be?
joey4127 is offline   0
Old Jan 19, 2005, 09:28 AM   #2
mischief
macrumors 68030
 
mischief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Santa Cruz Ca
Don't even have to check....

YES.

Unless it lacks either a VGA connector or a DVI connector (improbable beyond comprehension). If it's a monitor between 13" and 23" that's described as either "Analog" or "Digital" it should work just fine.

You could even use an oldschool AppleVision monitor if you could stand having 6" of adapters back there.
__________________
Power attracts pathological personalities. It is not that power corrupts but that it is magnetic to the corruptible.
-Frank Herbert
mischief is offline   0
Old Jan 19, 2005, 09:32 AM   #3
joey4127
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Send a message via AIM to joey4127
Quote:
Originally Posted by mischief
YES.

Unless it lacks either a VGA connector or a DVI connector (improbable beyond comprehension). If it's a monitor between 13" and 23" that's described as either "Analog" or "Digital" it should work just fine.

You could even use an oldschool AppleVision monitor if you could stand having 6" of adapters back there.
Thats the thing. I can't find if it has VGA. This is what I found out...http://www.costcentral.com/proddetai...2BLACK/E74183/

On the bottom it says,
Interface
VGA (HD-15)

Is that it?
joey4127 is offline   0
Old Jan 19, 2005, 09:44 AM   #4
gekko513
macrumors 601
 
gekko513's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
"Input Connectors: 15-pin D-Sub"

It's regular VGA, so yes it's compatible.
__________________
Someone get Nekkid™, now!
gekko513 is offline   0
Old Jan 19, 2005, 09:46 AM   #5
joey4127
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Send a message via AIM to joey4127
Quote:
Originally Posted by gekko513
"Input Connectors: 15-pin D-Sub"

It's regular VGA, so yes it's compatible.
Thanks, I'm gonna order it for my mac mini right now
joey4127 is offline   0
Old Jan 19, 2005, 09:47 AM   #6
mischief
macrumors 68030
 
mischief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Santa Cruz Ca
Quote:
Originally Posted by joey4127
Thats the thing. I can't find if it has VGA. This is what I found out...http://www.costcentral.com/proddetai...2BLACK/E74183/

On the bottom it says,
Interface
VGA (HD-15)

Is that it?
Yup.

Seriously: The pieces of common hardware out there that don't work with Macs are either PCI cards, Specialty scanners that lack TWAIN support, Specialty printers that lack both Mac drivers AND CUPS/PPD support (less than 1%) or input devices that rely on oddball drivers (CH Joysticks).

For the most part Monitors, common scanners, printers, external drives, DV cameras, digital still cameras, all mice and most keyboards, etc. will all work out of the box with a new Mac... most with no driver other than Panther's own set.

It's once you get into specialty equipment (ALPS printers, fringe-market game controllers, PCI cards beyond USB, Firewire, Wireless) that you run into the Mac Driver question.

The only other thing to keep in mind is that Macs lack Parallel and analog serial ports.
__________________
Power attracts pathological personalities. It is not that power corrupts but that it is magnetic to the corruptible.
-Frank Herbert
mischief is offline   0
Old Jan 19, 2005, 09:59 AM   #7
joey4127
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Send a message via AIM to joey4127
Quote:
Originally Posted by mischief
Yup.

Seriously: The pieces of common hardware out there that don't work with Macs are either PCI cards, Specialty scanners that lack TWAIN support, Specialty printers that lack both Mac drivers AND CUPS/PPD support (less than 1%) or input devices that rely on oddball drivers (CH Joysticks).

For the most part Monitors, common scanners, printers, external drives, DV cameras, digital still cameras, all mice and most keyboards, etc. will all work out of the box with a new Mac... most with no driver other than Panther's own set.

It's once you get into specialty equipment (ALPS printers, fringe-market game controllers, PCI cards beyond USB, Firewire, Wireless) that you run into the Mac Driver question.

The only other thing to keep in mind is that Macs lack Parallel and analog serial ports.
The only other thing to keep in mind is that Macs lack Parallel and analog serial ports.

What does that mean?
joey4127 is offline   0
Old Jan 19, 2005, 10:04 AM   #8
sgarringer
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Quote:
Originally Posted by mischief
The only other thing to keep in mind is that Macs lack Parallel and analog serial ports.
not to nit pick but there is no such thing as an analog serial port. You meant an RS-232 serial port (it is a digital port).
sgarringer is offline   0
Old Jan 19, 2005, 10:19 AM   #9
joey4127
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Send a message via AIM to joey4127
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgarringer
not to nit pick but there is no such thing as an analog serial port. You meant an RS-232 serial port (it is a digital port).

So it will be compatible %100....I need to know. The Samsung one.
joey4127 is offline   0
Old Jan 19, 2005, 10:41 AM   #10
TEG
macrumors 604
 
TEG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Langley, Washington
Send a message via ICQ to TEG Send a message via AIM to TEG Send a message via MSN to TEG Send a message via Yahoo to TEG Send a message via Skype™ to TEG
Quote:
Originally Posted by mischief
The only other thing to keep in mind is that Macs lack Parallel and analog serial ports.
How's this then:
Macs lack (LPT) Parallel and (COM) serial ports.
Macs have no built in floppy drives either. (Thank the maker)

TEG
__________________
Apple and Dell are the only ones in this industry making money. They make it by being Wal-Mart. We make it by innovation, - Steve Jobs
The Tegian Zone-Glass Onion Radio
TEG is offline   0
Old Jan 19, 2005, 12:28 PM   #11
mfacey
macrumors 65816
 
mfacey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Netherlands
Send a message via MSN to mfacey
Quote:
Originally Posted by joey4127
So it will be compatible %100....I need to know. The Samsung one.
Yep. I have run a similar Samsung LCD on my powerbook. No problems whatsoever!
__________________
iPad 3 32GB WiFi | iPad Mini 16GB | Alu iMac 24" 3.06 GHz | Mac Mini 2.3 i5 | iPhone 4S 16 GB | 2G & 4G Shuffle | Nano 8GB
mfacey is offline   0
Old Jan 19, 2005, 08:55 PM   #12
joey4127
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Send a message via AIM to joey4127
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfacey
Yep. I have run a similar Samsung LCD on my powerbook. No problems whatsoever!
Thanks, i will order it then.
joey4127 is offline   0
Old Jan 19, 2005, 11:06 PM   #13
candan9019
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ontario-> Louisiana-> Colorado-> Ontario
Send a message via AIM to candan9019
Quote:
Originally Posted by joey4127
The only other thing to keep in mind is that Macs lack Parallel and analog serial ports.

What does that mean?
Parallel and Serial ports are not used as display connectors so your ok. They are used on some printers and game controllers. Mostly on stuff that mischief was talking about, oddball stuff. But most PC's still have them for some reason.
candan9019 is offline   0
Old Jan 20, 2005, 09:19 AM   #14
bigandy
macrumors G3
 
bigandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: B'more
Quote:
Originally Posted by mischief
The only other thing to keep in mind is that Macs lack Parallel and analog serial ports.
and who would want an ugly RS232 or parallel port on their beautiful mac anyway?

the only reason they're still around is to keep the backs of PCs looking grim and nasty, full of bugs etc...
__________________
"any day that involves cat pee is a really bad day" - iBlue
bigandy is offline   0
Old Jan 20, 2005, 09:29 AM   #15
sgarringer
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigandy
and who would want an ugly RS232 or parallel port on their beautiful mac anyway?

the only reason they're still around is to keep the backs of PCs looking grim and nasty, full of bugs etc...
Actually, I use RS-232 all the time to connect my laptop (iBook) to various Cisco switches, and to our VAX system to administer voicemail boxes.

Serial is still used, however not so much in consumer electronics.
sgarringer is offline   0
Old Jan 20, 2005, 10:08 AM   #16
cluthz
macrumors 68040
 
cluthz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Norway
Send a message via MSN to cluthz
There was a Samsung monitor recently that all color/brigthness adjustments was done in a Win-only App/Control-panel, not sure what is was called.

-tb
__________________
-tb
MacBook Air 13" i5 osx10.7.5
HackPro 4.3GHz, 16GB RAM, GTX780GHz Edition, 3x SSD , win7+osx10.9.2
cluthz is offline   0
Old Jan 20, 2005, 10:26 AM   #17
Timelessblur
Banned
 
Timelessblur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigandy
and who would want an ugly RS232 or parallel port on their beautiful mac anyway?

the only reason they're still around is to keep the backs of PCs looking grim and nasty, full of bugs etc...

First get over your self and looks sorry just never like how some people thinks looks of there computer is so imporant .
2nd yes they are out date but they are still extemaly usefull. There is a lot of hardware still in use today that can only run off Parallel ports (namely printers that are over 3-4 years old) Also it is a lot easier to make equiment to run off parrell/RS232 than it is to to make them for USB or firewire. A heck of a lot easier (this is coming from my EE and CompEE friends who have done some stuff like that before). That just an example of how old tech is sometimes a lot better than new
Timelessblur is offline   0
Old Jan 20, 2005, 01:23 PM   #18
scarr
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timelessblur
First get over your self and looks sorry just never like how some people thinks looks of there computer is so imporant .
...
That just an example of how old tech is sometimes a lot better than new
From your first comment, I'm surprised you aren't an EE/CompE. (I'm an EE grad.) I think it's kinda sad that more companies (apparently) don't care what their products look like. Between "good and ugly" and "good and pretty," I'll go with the latter.

As for the claim that RS-232 is somehow better, that only applies minorly to people programming low-level drivers (such as students). I'd like to see someone transfer gigabytes of information across it and be pleased with the results.
scarr is offline   0
Old Jan 20, 2005, 03:26 PM   #19
sgarringer
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarr
From your first comment, I'm surprised you aren't an EE/CompE. (I'm an EE grad.) I think it's kinda sad that more companies (apparently) don't care what their products look like. Between "good and ugly" and "good and pretty," I'll go with the latter.

As for the claim that RS-232 is somehow better, that only applies minorly to people programming low-level drivers (such as students). I'd like to see someone transfer gigabytes of information across it and be pleased with the results.
Jesus, I've never seen an RS-232 flamewar.

Coming from my background in EE, I would think that you guys would realize that a USB interface is actually easier than a RS-232 interface almost any day. There are USB drivers on 1 chip now, and you have much less to worry about with minor timing issues between the device and the computer. I recently finished developing a USB interface for a data collection module, and I'll tell you what, I was very glad that I didnt have to worry about timing the interface at exactly 9600bps anymore, it was truely a godsend.

Not to mention that USB -> Serial converters are dirt cheap, so really, putting an RS-232 port on a computer anymore is a waste. RS-232 never caught on, and Centronics Parallel is dying out also...
sgarringer is offline   0
Old Jan 20, 2005, 05:08 PM   #20
Timelessblur
Banned
 
Timelessblur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarr
From your first comment, I'm surprised you aren't an EE/CompE. (I'm an EE grad.) I think it's kinda sad that more companies (apparently) don't care what their products look like. Between "good and ugly" and "good and pretty," I'll go with the latter.

As for the claim that RS-232 is somehow better, that only applies minorly to people programming low-level drivers (such as students). I'd like to see someone transfer gigabytes of information across it and be pleased with the results.
well for high speed stuff yeah it is faster for USB 2 I never said it was faster I just said it was easier to make a deviece that does so. As for looks I think ti should be funitionallity first looks 2nd.

As for not being a compE or EE. I dont like it CompE and EE enough to do it for a living and to learn the basic. I enjoy learnign about Civil Engineering a lot more and find that stuff much more enjoyble.
Timelessblur is offline   0
Old Jan 24, 2005, 11:52 AM   #21
mischief
macrumors 68030
 
mischief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Santa Cruz Ca
Exclamation What the hell did I start here?!?!!?

Jeez.... I somehow feel left out of a flamewar I started....


Um...

Er...

Aha!!

I still say there's nothing like AmigaDOS!!!! Hah!
__________________
Power attracts pathological personalities. It is not that power corrupts but that it is magnetic to the corruptible.
-Frank Herbert
mischief is offline   0
Old Jan 24, 2005, 12:12 PM   #22
Timelessblur
Banned
 
Timelessblur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by mischief
Jeez.... I somehow feel left out of a flamewar I started....


Um...

Er...

Aha!!

I still say there's nothing like AmigaDOS!!!! Hah!

I would not of callled it a flame war more of a discussiong with minor friendly jabs in there.
Timelessblur is offline   0
Old Jan 24, 2005, 12:23 PM   #23
mischief
macrumors 68030
 
mischief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Santa Cruz Ca
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timelessblur
I would not of callled it a flame war more of a discussiong with minor friendly jabs in there.
This is about as good a Flamewar as we can get since the board was made "safe and sane".

It seems most users are too twitchy about the idea of the old-style poop-slinging chaos.... even if it were set up as a specific thread... I've tried a few times and finally gave up. Nobody wants to sling pies anymore. *sigh*

Of course, I'm speaking of opening a thread just for blowing off steam. I still find Trolling and non-narrative flaming lame... I just like having the occasional narrative pie-fight. It's like "Dozens" for the Forums.
__________________
Power attracts pathological personalities. It is not that power corrupts but that it is magnetic to the corruptible.
-Frank Herbert
mischief is offline   0


 
MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > Product Recommendations/Reviews

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What do you think Mac OS X 10.10 be compatible with Jordan246 OS X 16 Apr 25, 2014 08:40 AM
Samsung announced 24" Mac compatible touchscreen monitor. Does it work on Mac 10.8.4? Warrenn Mac Peripherals 7 Jul 12, 2013 10:34 PM
mac mini not compatible with my tv?? k8raye11 Mac mini 6 Nov 13, 2012 09:02 AM
cMBP 13" swapping LCD from MBA 13" - compatible? Kai.Def MacBook Pro 4 Nov 8, 2012 09:47 PM
Mac OS X/Mac Pro 4,1-compatible graphic cards? Pörsödil Windows, Linux & Others on the Mac 0 Sep 7, 2012 04:35 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:41 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC