Let me preface this thread by stating that I have never been satisfied with ATT coverage in my home town of San Diego. I have lived in the north end of the city and now in the downtown area and the cell coverage is poor compared with that of Verizon.
For the past 8 days I was on vacation in New York City. I have heard about the issues with ATT coverage in the Big Apple but it was difficult to imagine it. I was staying and hanging out in Manhattan...So here goes:
1. Cell coverage was better than I expected though I had many dropped calls. Not better nor worse than San Diego...which is still pretty weak.
2. Web browsing was generally much slower than in San Diego. My wife and I experienced this in several sections of Manhattan.
3. Text-ing was the big surprise: Very SLOW receipt of texts. Sometimes several minutes. In San Diego I get texts quite quickly for the most part but in NYC it could be in 5 seconds or 10 minutes. I sent my wife a text when I was 5 blocks away from our hotel and when I met her back in the room she had not received it yet. Then about 2 minutes later the text was delivered to her iphone. We checked the 'bars' on her phone and it was fully loaded. What is THAT about?
4. Spoke with several iphone owners and 100% of the the 3GS owners said the are waiting for the Verizon version before they get a new iphone. Most of the IP4 owners felt locked into ATT due to the $375 plan buy-out charge.
For all of the ATT apologists, ATT has promised that things will get better and i know now what their strategy is: wait until people pile on to Verizon's network so as as to have fewer customers who can complain and, as a consequence, have more available bandwidth...now if they could only fix that 'coverage' problem...
For the past 8 days I was on vacation in New York City. I have heard about the issues with ATT coverage in the Big Apple but it was difficult to imagine it. I was staying and hanging out in Manhattan...So here goes:
1. Cell coverage was better than I expected though I had many dropped calls. Not better nor worse than San Diego...which is still pretty weak.
2. Web browsing was generally much slower than in San Diego. My wife and I experienced this in several sections of Manhattan.
3. Text-ing was the big surprise: Very SLOW receipt of texts. Sometimes several minutes. In San Diego I get texts quite quickly for the most part but in NYC it could be in 5 seconds or 10 minutes. I sent my wife a text when I was 5 blocks away from our hotel and when I met her back in the room she had not received it yet. Then about 2 minutes later the text was delivered to her iphone. We checked the 'bars' on her phone and it was fully loaded. What is THAT about?
4. Spoke with several iphone owners and 100% of the the 3GS owners said the are waiting for the Verizon version before they get a new iphone. Most of the IP4 owners felt locked into ATT due to the $375 plan buy-out charge.
For all of the ATT apologists, ATT has promised that things will get better and i know now what their strategy is: wait until people pile on to Verizon's network so as as to have fewer customers who can complain and, as a consequence, have more available bandwidth...now if they could only fix that 'coverage' problem...
Last edited: