|
|
#1 |
|
Core i3 or Core i5 iMac?
I know this has probably been answered a billion times, but I need the answer for my specific needs.
My daily use will be: Web browsing iTunes Watching HD Movies Bit Torrent HandBrake Dvd Burning Windows Parallels Social Networking iPhoto and thats basicially it. Can someone tell me if I really need the Core i5 2.8ghz, or should choose the Core i3 3.2ghz. Mind you, I dont wanna max out the machine with daily use...but dont want to overkill it. Thanks. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Me too??
I am very curious about this myself. I know I want a 27 inch without question, but I don't know wether I need and i5 or not? My needs are pretty much the same as the OP. I am waiting though for the revision on the iMac before I mac a decision. Even after the new machines come out I will still most likely go to refurbished route...WAAAYYYY too good of a deal for any machine you get on a refurb
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Id go with an i5. It will last you longer, and gives you the option to do heavier lifting if need be.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Neither, i7 is the lowest anyone should buy.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#5 |
|
i3 sounds like it should be free.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#6 |
|
How is see it.. You just have to look at your wallet. There will be always something better. Almost all the things that your gonna do with your imac don't 'need' the i5 but everyone knows that it's better.
When people say that buying a more expensive iMac you are prepared for the future then I say that it depends on its user. If you want to do more complicated things over time than 'yes' a better cpu is great. But if your list doesn't change over time, than you can spend the extra money on other stuff.. Because surfing now wouldnt be much different in a year or 2. Your list are full of things where you can say: if your mac can do it now, then it can do it forever (exept if it dies).. I have the same dilemma. The only things that I do is: Surfing Itunes iPhoto Watch a movie Playing a game like starcraft II, WoW, etc. I think that all those things can be perfectly done with the Imac 3,2 Ghz I3. But at the other hand I'm thinking about the I5.. For the feeling 'Just For Sure' .. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#7 |
|
I purchased an i3 imac having moved from a Quad core pc over clocked to 3ghz.
I pleasantly surprised with what i have purchased. There are.... No issues with watching HD movies No issues with Ripping with handbreak No issues with editing photos with iPhoto/Aperture No issues with torrents No issues with web browsing No issues with iTunes. If anything i should have probably gone with the higher graphics card as scrolling photos in iPhoto is a bit gittery. I only say this having come from picasa which is very smooth. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#8 |
|
i have the 3.06 i3 by the way.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#9 |
|
The i3 will be fine for your tasks. Browsing the internet, playing some music and the odd bit of iPhoto won't make it cry like a girl.
__________________
rMBP 15"(2012) 2.3 i7 | 16GB | 256GB | 650M iMac 27"(2011) 3.1 i5 | 8GB | 1TB | 6970M DS211j 2x2TB |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Why is it that nobody seems to opt for the i7 2.9GHz option? Is it too expensive Vs. i3 + i5 or is it not worth the upgrade?
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#11 |
|
its totally worth it. mathmaticaly the more you spend on your imac the more you are getting for each buck.
__________________
iPhone 5 Black 64GB. 17" MBP 2.2GHz i7, 16GB RAM. Canon 7D + grip, 24-70mm f/2.8L USM, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#12 |
|
I agree completely. The only thing about the iMac which I think is a bit of a let down is the GPU. I think it's a bit weak. However, I assume this will be upgraded in the summer updates later this year.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#13 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#14 |
|
If you can't afford i7, go with i5.
If you can't afford the i5, get a macbook air instead.
__________________
(05) 15" Powerbook 1,67ghz, 2gb, 80gb / (09) 24" iMac, 2,66ghz, 4gb, 640gb / (06) 2x 20" MacPro 1,1, 2 dc xeon 2,66 (4cores), 6gb, 7tb, (10) iPhone4 16gb, black (11) iPad2, white, 16gb, 3g
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Quote:
These forums constantly amaze me at how often people are recommended to simply waste money on upgrades that they will never see the benefit from. Somebody browsing the internet is fine with an i3, they don't need an i5 or an i7. Remember when we used to do exactly the same things on a Core Duo from 2006? There are many many people happily using Core 2 Duo iMacs, which an i3 will be equal to if not faster than.
__________________
rMBP 15"(2012) 2.3 i7 | 16GB | 256GB | 650M iMac 27"(2011) 3.1 i5 | 8GB | 1TB | 6970M DS211j 2x2TB |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#16 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#17 |
|
I was asking myself the same question. Playing around with the i3 iMacs in the Apple store, it seems obvious that the i3 models are perfectly fine for all those normal every-day tasks the OP listed above.
I've anyway decided to go for an i5 (on my to-do list for this week ) because... well... I can't find a real solid reason. I guess it has something to do with "just to make sure..." but I guess that in real life, I would do just as fine with an i3.It does also make no sense to plan 10 years ahead... an i3 will look just the same as an i5 or even an i7 will by then... it will look old... old and slow, equally slow. That's all. Look at the machines that were considered modern 10 years ago... It might be a different story if the horsepower of your iMac helps yo to make a living. Then the equations faster = better might make more sense... but I'm only gonna use my iMac at home. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Thanks for all the info guys. Still a little undecided about the Core i3 vs. Core i5. Right now I know I want the 27" iMac with the added SSD option with 8GB RAM. But honestly, probably will end up going for the i5 2.8ghz, just because id rather be a little overkill than a little dissapointed with the i3.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Quote:
![]() - Vodouman |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#20 |
|
i3 should work well enough, but I sympathize with the temptation to get the i5. As far as future-proofing, I think your money goes farther to buy what you need now and turn over your equipment more often. Most of the time, I think today's top-of-the-line machines are destined to be outperformed by low or midlevel models in the next two years. Good luck with your purchase!
__________________
MacSignal |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#21 |
|
I made my decision to buy the i3 3,6Ghz version. Just because thats enough for the things that I want to do with my Mac. And this one is available in the store around the corner.. I want to have it now and do not want to wait for it ^_^..Its always better than my HP PAVILLION Notebook..
I dont do a lot of heavy things on my computer so the i3 is good for me.. The time when I notice that the iMac irritates me because it's slow or something, then it's a signal to save up money again and buy better.. And I think it will take a looooong time.... |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Good call man.
I don't think the i5 is worth the money from an i3. I wholeheartedly believe it's a decision between i3 and i7. If the i3 won't cut it, don't even look at the i5. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Haha. Goodness no. If I had that type of money to blow i'd probably just buy a Mac Pro. lol. Thanks for posting the warning, hopefully people that dont know after market is cheaper will take notice now. :]
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#24 |
|
I am pondering the same decision. The rational/'I need' part of my mind tells me to go i3..the irrational/'I want' part tells me to go i5... ^_^
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Quote:
Plus, quad-core apps will probably get quite popular in the next year or so, so I would like my iMac to be able to jump on board with ease if I want to. |
||
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Upgrading White intel iMac processor... 17", 1.83 ghz | mar2194 | iMac | 50 | Dec 25, 2012 01:39 PM |
| Core i5 MacBook Pro SLOW Boot Time | aaronhead14 | MacBook Pro | 27 | Oct 6, 2011 01:34 PM |
| 13" Core i7 or Core i5 + SSD & RAM | jamienglish | MacBook Pro | 19 | Mar 24, 2011 11:37 AM |
| 2010 iMac config:core i3 with 8gb RAM OR core i5 with 4gb RAM? | spacecowboy71 | iMac | 2 | Aug 22, 2010 06:05 PM |
| Core i3 or Core 2 Duo | seong | MacBook Pro | 12 | Mar 2, 2010 09:24 AM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 AM.









) because... well... I can't find a real solid reason. I guess it has something to do with "just to make sure..." but I guess that in real life, I would do just as fine with an i3.
Linear Mode

