Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > Mac Pro

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Feb 25, 2011, 04:40 PM   #1
MattDSLR
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Canada
Mac Pro GeekBench-Whats your score?

Here is my
I know its not the best but will be upgrading to 8 core 3.43 in 2012 but for now i'm happy with 14950

Mac Pro (Mid 2010)
Summary



http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/364840



Show us your number
__________________
Waiting for New Mac Pro maybe in 2015
MP 5.1 12 core 20 TB internal storage and DroboD running of USB3.0 | rMBP 2.6 | Samsung S4 and Note3

Last edited by MattDSLR; Feb 26, 2011 at 12:48 PM.
MattDSLR is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2011, 05:01 PM   #2
philipma1957
macrumors 603
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/307373



9800 plus a 2010 quad 2.8ghz
philipma1957 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2011, 05:42 PM   #3
wonderspark
macrumors 68030
 
wonderspark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oregon
Not sure how you post the screen capture thing, but I got 10432.
2009 Quad 3.33GHz
It wouldn't let me do 64-bit, since I was in demo mode.
__________________
Wait a second... So you're telling me anything that happens in the sky is legal, and there's a giant crime-blimp flying around this place? I don't know how I missed that.
wonderspark is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2011, 05:55 PM   #4
Musubi
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hawaii / 東京 日本
http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/297935

Mac Pro (mid 2010), Intel Xeon W3680, 3.33GHz, 12GB 1333MHz DDR3 = 16023
Musubi is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2011, 06:27 PM   #5
Whaditis
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2010
12460 on a 2009 8-core 2.26 x2

http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/363676
Whaditis is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2011, 06:44 PM   #6
dcpmark
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
12348 on a 2008 8-Core 3.2ghz

Geekbench Summary

System Information
Platform: Mac OS X x86 (64-bit)
Compiler: GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5494)
Operating System: Mac OS X 10.6.6 (Build 10J567)
Model: Mac Pro (Early 2008)
Motherboard: Apple Inc. Mac-F42C88C8 Proto1
Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5482 @ 3.20GHz
Processor ID: GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 23 Stepping 6
Logical Processors: 8
Physical Processors: 2
Processor Frequency: 3.20 GHz
L1 Instruction Cache: 32.0 KB
L1 Data Cache: 32.0 KB
L2 Cache: 6.00 MB
L3 Cache: 0.00 B
Bus Frequency: 1.60 GHz
Memory: 10.00 GB
Memory Type: 800 MHz DDR2 FB-DIMM
SIMD: 1
BIOS: Apple Inc.
Processor Model: Intel Xeon X5482
Processor Cores: 8

Geekbench 2 Score: 12348
dcpmark is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2011, 08:11 PM   #7
beto2k7
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: ::1
http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/363807

Mac Pro in my sig.
__________________
2010 Mac Pro | 2 x 2.40 GHz| 24Gb RAM | 3x2TB RAID0 | GTX 570 | 27" ALCD |
iPad 2 16Gb wifi+3G |
iPhone 4S 32Gb Unlocked |

Last edited by beto2k7; Feb 25, 2011 at 08:24 PM.
beto2k7 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2011, 12:37 AM   #8
SCSnare
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Austin, TX
http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/364059



Mac Pro in my sig.
__________________
2.66GHz 12-Core Mac Pro, 24GB RAM, 120GB OWC SSD | 2009 17" 2.8GHz MBP, 4GB RAM | 2010 Mac Mini
SCSnare is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2011, 07:21 AM   #9
rmitchell248
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Liebsthal, Germany
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattDSLR View Post
Here is my
I know its not the best but will be upgrading to 8 core 3.43 in 2012 but for now i'm happy with 14910

Mac Pro (Mid 2010)
Summary

Section Description Score Geekbench Score
Geekbench 2.1.12 for Mac OS X x86 (64-bit)
Integer Processor integer performance 14203 14910
Floating Point Processor floating point performance 24505
Memory Memory performance 4178
Stream Memory bandwidth performance 5268
System Information

Operating System Mac OS X 10.6.6 (Build 10J567)

http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/363360

Show us your number

If you will go through all the work to upgrade why not go to 12 core 3.46? They should slip right in there.
rmitchell248 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2011, 10:40 AM   #10
MattDSLR
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmitchell248 View Post
If you will go through all the work to upgrade why not go to 12 core 3.46? They should slip right in there.
When they come out they will be 300 to 500 more that 8 core units
__________________
Waiting for New Mac Pro maybe in 2015
MP 5.1 12 core 20 TB internal storage and DroboD running of USB3.0 | rMBP 2.6 | Samsung S4 and Note3
MattDSLR is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2011, 12:00 PM   #11
gpzjock
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: May 2009
Old School Overclocked

Octo 2008 Mac Pro 2.8 Ghz overclocked at 3.08 Ghz with OWC 120 GB SSD and 16 GB RAM:
http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/349922
Not bad for 3 years on. Half the speed of a 12 core 2010 with 24 threads!

Last edited by gpzjock; Feb 26, 2011 at 12:06 PM.
gpzjock is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2011, 12:11 PM   #12
scottsjack
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Arizona
Not too bad for a quad. The boot drive is a WD Caviar Black 2TB with 64Mb Cache. There are 12GB of OWC 1336 RAM (running of course at 1062).

http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/364818
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Screen shot 2011-02-26 at 11.04.17 AM.jpg
Views:	248
Size:	127.5 KB
ID:	273034  
scottsjack is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2011, 01:02 PM   #13
MattDSLR
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by gpzjock View Post
Octo 2008 Mac Pro 2.8 Ghz overclocked at 3.08 Ghz with OWC 120 GB SSD and 16 GB RAM:
http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/349922
Not bad for 3 years on. Half the speed of a 12 core 2010 with 24 threads!
That looks good
Well done
__________________
Waiting for New Mac Pro maybe in 2015
MP 5.1 12 core 20 TB internal storage and DroboD running of USB3.0 | rMBP 2.6 | Samsung S4 and Note3
MattDSLR is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2011, 01:04 PM   #14
rmitchell248
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Liebsthal, Germany
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattDSLR View Post
When they come out they will be 300 to 500 more that 8 core units
how much are the dual 4 core processors going to set you back?


you can get the 3.46 6 cores now for a little over 1000 each, they are a bit pricey for 2
rmitchell248 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2011, 01:23 PM   #15
Mac Hammer Fan
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Belgium
8524 in 32-bit mode.
Is there a big difference between the 64-bit version?
__________________
MacPro Hex 3,33 GHz Westmere OWC Accelsior SSD 16 GB ATI 5870 Macbook Duo 2,2 GHz PowerMac G5 Dual Core 2,3 Ghz Emac 1,42 GHz IPad 16 GB iPhone 4S
Mac Hammer Fan is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2011, 01:43 PM   #16
rmitchell248
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Liebsthal, Germany
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac Hammer Fan View Post
8524 in 32-bit mode.
Is there a big difference between the 64-bit version?
if I had to guess probably 1000 points
rmitchell248 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2011, 02:34 PM   #17
MattDSLR
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmitchell248 View Post
how much are the dual 4 core processors going to set you back?


you can get the 3.46 6 cores now for a little over 1000 each, they are a bit pricey for 2
I will be looking at upgrade in Jan or Feb of 2012
2 things may cause me not to upgrade
new processors from intel in revision 6.1 or no available TB pci card by 2012

Now I use 3 firewire card reader to download files from my cards it would be a bonus to have TB in the computer i could upload 140 gig of files in less than 30 min VS almost 45 min on FW800

Right now i'm really happy with 8 core.
__________________
Waiting for New Mac Pro maybe in 2015
MP 5.1 12 core 20 TB internal storage and DroboD running of USB3.0 | rMBP 2.6 | Samsung S4 and Note3
MattDSLR is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2011, 04:10 PM   #18
Johnf1285
macrumors 6502a
 
Johnf1285's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Jersey
32bit version. I'm not paying for geekbench.

Excellent for my needs! I can't stand hot laptops and hot iMac's. Long live the Mac Pro!!

2.8ghz quad w/ 6gb 1066 ddr3
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	gbench.jpg
Views:	133
Size:	293.9 KB
ID:	273095  

Last edited by Johnf1285; Feb 26, 2011 at 04:16 PM.
Johnf1285 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2011, 04:52 PM   #19
derbothaus
macrumors 601
 
derbothaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/365209

Geekbench is all over the place I get between 16030 and 16240.
__________________
Mac Pro W3680, GTX 680, 12GB DDR3, SSD; MBP, 2.6GHz Core i7, 16GB DDR3, SSD; Eizo fs2333
derbothaus is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2011, 12:57 PM   #20
MattDSLR
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnf1285 View Post
32bit version. I'm not paying for geekbench.

Excellent for my needs! I can't stand hot laptops and hot iMac's. Long live the Mac Pro!!

2.8ghz quad w/ 6gb 1066 ddr3
with 64 bit you will gain about 1000 to 1500
Well done
__________________
Waiting for New Mac Pro maybe in 2015
MP 5.1 12 core 20 TB internal storage and DroboD running of USB3.0 | rMBP 2.6 | Samsung S4 and Note3
MattDSLR is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2011, 11:39 PM   #21
strausd
macrumors 68030
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Texas
MP in sig

http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/367307
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Screen shot 2011-02-27 at 11.38.46 PM.png
Views:	219
Size:	185.1 KB
ID:	273395  
strausd is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2011, 04:47 AM   #22
alphaod
macrumors Core
 
alphaod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 上海 (Shanghai)
15782; almost a 2 year old machine.

http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/183533
__________________
Mac Pro | Mac mini | 15" MacBook Pro | iPad Air | iPhone 6
alphaod is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2011, 07:24 AM   #23
fabriciom
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Madrid
2009 Pro
__________________
Logic Pro 9 - 2009 (2010 Flashed) Mac Pro 2x 3,2GHz W5580 - 24 GB RAM - 120GB OCZ SSD - 6TB Hitachi Ultrastar A7K3000 - RME RayDAT - RME ADI-8 Pro - UAD2 Quad - Lots of Audio Toys
fabriciom is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2011, 10:34 PM   #24
thegreatdivorce
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Upper Left USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by gpzjock View Post
Octo 2008 Mac Pro 2.8 Ghz overclocked at 3.08 Ghz with OWC 120 GB SSD and 16 GB RAM:
http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/349922
Not bad for 3 years on. Half the speed of a 12 core 2010 with 24 threads!
Nice. How are you overclocked (zdnet?), and is it stable at 3.08? Sorry for the small threadjack, I'll post my GB when I get back to the studio tmw.
__________________
15" rMBP 2.6/16/256 | 13" i5/256 MBA | 23" matte ACD | iPad Air | iPhone 5s | 4670k / R9 280x gaming rig
thegreatdivorce is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 1, 2011, 09:59 AM   #25
ChuckBlack
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Click image for larger version

Name:	Screen shot 2011-03-01 at 9.54.08 AM.jpeg
Views:	156
Size:	81.6 KB
ID:	273775
__________________
nMacPro 4 core, D300, 512, DROBO S 8TB, 30" Dell Monitor
ChuckBlack is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > Mac Pro

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Geekbench Score For W3690 In Mac Pro? wispy007 Mac Pro 19 Dec 24, 2013 01:52 PM
Mac Mini GeekBench 2 Score 13,037 (Video) Dan in MD Mac mini 63 Nov 6, 2012 02:13 AM
2012 Mac mini can run 32GB of RAM? Look at this Geekbench score cocacolakid Mac mini 5 Oct 27, 2012 11:44 AM
Low geekbench score i5 macbook pro.... why? jesso MacBook Pro 7 Jul 24, 2012 02:25 PM
Geekbench Score higher with less Ram installed (Mid 2012 13 Macbook Pro) Gator24765 MacBook Pro 7 Jul 5, 2012 05:07 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC